A Foundation for Cue-Triggered Behavior

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3632

References

  • Abbas AE , Bell DE (2015) Ordinal one-switch utility functions. Oper. Res. 63(6):1411–1419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abratt R , Goodey SD (1990) Unplanned buying and in-store stimuli in supermarkets. Management Decision Econom. 11(2):111–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA , Kranton RE (2005) Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(1):9–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J , Rao JM , Trachtman H (2017) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. J. Political Econom. 125(3):625–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apesteguia J , Ballester MA , Lu J (2017) Single-crossing random utility models. Econometrica 85(2):661–674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE , Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Armstrong M , Porter R , eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization , Vol. 3 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1701–1844.Google Scholar
  • Bassi A , Colacito R , Fulghieri P (2013) ’O sole mio: An experimental analysis of weather and risk attitudes in financial decisions. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(7):1824–1852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden WO , Shimp TA (1982) The use of extrinsic cues to facilitate product adoption. J. Marketing Res. 19(2):229–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechara A (2005) Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat. Neurosci. 8(11):1458–1463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS , Murphy KM (1993) A simple theory of advertising as a good or bad. Quart. J. Econom. 108(4):941–964.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DE (1988) One-switch utility functions and a measure of risk. Management Sci. 34(12):1416–1424.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bennett R (2009) Impulsive donation decisions during online browsing of charity websites. J. Consumer Behav. 8(2–3):116–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim BD , Rangel A (2004) Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1558–1590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim BD , Rangel A (2009) Beyond revealed preference: Choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):51–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berridge KC , Aldridge JW (2009) Decision utility, incentive salience, and cue-triggered “wanting”. Oxford Ser. Soc. Cognition Soc. Neurosci. 2009:509–533.Google Scholar
  • Blanco M , Engelmann D , Normann HT (2011) A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences. Games Econom. Behav. 72(2):321–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Börgers T , Choo Y-M (2017) Revealed relative utilitarianism . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  • Braithwaite D (1928) The economic effects of advertisement. Econom. J. 38(149):16–37.Google Scholar
  • Card D , Dahl GB (2011) Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):103–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G , Holder P (2019) Charity in the laboratory: Matching, competition, and group identity. Management Sci. 65(3):1398–1407.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G , Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox JC , Sadiraj V (2007) On modeling voluntary contributions to public goods. Public Finance Rev. 35(2):311–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox JC , Friedman D , Sadiraj V (2008) Revealed altruism. Econometrica 76(1):31–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubois P , Griffith R , O’Connell M (2017) 04). The effects of banning advertising in junk food markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(1):396–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duflo E , Kremer M , Robinson J (2011) Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2350–2390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E , Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC (1984) On Harsanyi’s utilitarian cardinal welfare theorem. Theory Decision 17(1):21–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D , Levine DK (2006) A dual-self model of impulse control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1449–1476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goette L , Huffman D , Meier S , Sutter M (2012) Competition between organizational groups: Its impact on altruistic and antisocial motivations. Management Sci. 58(5):948–960.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guiso L , Sapienza P , Zingales L (2018) Time varying risk aversion. J. Financial Econom. 128(3):403–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gul F , Pesendorfer W (2001) Temptation and self-control. Econometrica 69(6):1403–1435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halevy Y (2008) Strotz meets Allais: Diminishing impatience and the certainty effect. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1145–1162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herstein IN , Milnor J (1953) An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica 21(2):291–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzenstein M , Posavac SS , Brakus JJ (2007) Adoption of new and really new products: The effects of self-regulation systems and risk salience. J. Marketing Res. 44(2):251–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D , Wakker PP , Sarin R (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):375–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaldor N (1950) The economic aspects of advertising. Rev. Econom. Stud. 18(1):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kessler JB , Milkman KL (2018) Identity in charitable giving. Management Sci. 64(2):845–859.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim BK , Zauberman G (2013) Can Victoria’s Secret change the future? A subjective time perception account of sexual-cue effects on impatience. J. Experiment. Psych. General 142(2):328–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knutson B , Wimmer GE , Kuhnen CM , Winkielman P (2008) Nucleus accumbens activation mediates the influence of reward cues on financial risk taking. Neuroreport 19(5):509–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna A (2012) An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 22(3):332–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhnen CM , Knutson B (2005) The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron 47(5):763–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D (2001) A cue-theory of consumption. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):81–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G , O’Donoghue T (2004) Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  • McClure SM , Laibson DI , Loewenstein G , Cohen JD (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306(5695):503–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClure SM , Ericson KM , Laibson DI , Loewenstein G , Cohen JD (2007) Time discounting for primary rewards. J. Neurosci. 27(21):5796–5804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCool J , Webb L , Cameron LD , Hoek J (2012) Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: Will they make a difference to adolescents? Soc. Sci. Medicine 74(8):1269–1273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milliman RE (1982) Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket shoppers. J. Marketing 46(3):86–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollay RW , Siddarth S , Siegel M , Haddix A , Merritt RK , Giovino GA , Eriksen MP (1996) The last straw? Cigarette advertising and realized market shares among youths and adults, 1979–1993. J. Marketing 60(2):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reichert T (2002) Sex in advertising research: A review of content, effects, and functions of sexual information in consumer advertising. Annual Rev. Sex Res. 13(1):241–273.Google Scholar
  • Roberts JH , Urban GL (1988) Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. 34(2):167–185.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. 16(2):158–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small DA , Loewenstein G , Slovic P (2007) Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):143–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spangenberg ER , Crowley AE , Henderson PW (1996) Improving the store environment: Do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors? J. Marketing 60(2):67–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH , Shefrin HM (1981) An economic theory of self-control. J. Political Econom. 89(2):392–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH , Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Penguin Books, London).Google Scholar
  • Van den Bergh B , Dewitte S , Warlop L (2008) Bikinis instigate generalized impatience in intertemporal choice. J. Consumer Res. 35(1):85–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Neumann J , Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Weymark JA (1993) Harsanyi’s social aggregation theorem and the weak Pareto principle. Soc. Choice Welfare 10(3):209–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.