Risk-Mitigating Technologies: The Case of Radiation Diagnostic Devices

References

• Acemoglu D, Linn J (2004) Market size in innovation: Theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):1049–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Levinthal D (2001) Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. 47(5):611–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman M (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angell M (1996) Science on Trial: The Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (2010) Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Indust. Corporate Change 19(3):775–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball GP, Macher JT, Stern AD (2019) Recalls, innovation, and competitor response: Evidence from medical device firms. Harvard Business School Working Paper 19-028, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, Gomez-Mejia LR (2013) Necessity as the mother of “green” inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management J. 34(8):891–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boutis K, Fischer J, Freedman S, Thomas K (2014) Radiation exposure from imaging tests in pediatric emergency medicine: A survey of physician knowledge and risk disclosure practices. J. Emergency Medicine 47(1):36–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner D, Hall E (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. New England J. Medicine 357(22):2277–2284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2010) Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Fabrizio K (2012) How do product users influence corporate invention? Organ. Sci. 23(4):971–987.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C, Bower J (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 129–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Klepper S (1996) Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Rev. Econom. Statist. 78(2):232–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R, Gambardella A, Novelli E (2019) Specializing in generality: Firm strategies when intermediate markets work. Organ. Sci. 30(1):126–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Daughety A, Reinganum J (1995) Product safety: Liability, R&D, and signaling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1187–1206.Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Gambardella A, Verona G (2012) Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Res. Policy 41(8):1283–1295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Olsen C (1994) The economic side effects of dangerous drug announcements. J. Law Econom. 37(2):323–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein A (2004) Static and dynamic effects of health policy: Evidence from the vaccine industry. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):527–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freedman S, Kearney M, Lederman M (2012) Product recalls, imperfect information, and spillover effects: Lessons from the consumer response to the 2007 toy recalls. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(2):499–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freiherr G (2010) Iterative reconstruction cuts CT dose without harming image quality. Diagnostic Imaging (December 14), https://www.diagnosticimaging.com/iterative-reconstruction-cuts-ct-dose-without-harming-image-quality.Google Scholar
• Fuchs V, Sox H (2001) Physicians’ views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Affairs 20(5):30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Luo H (2017) Tort reform and innovation. J. Law Econom. 60(3):385–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Luo H (2018) When does product liability risk chill innovation? Evidence from medical implants. NBER Working Paper 25068, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Luo H (2019) Risk-mitigating technologies: The case of radiation diagnostic devices. NBER Working Paper 26305, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gans J, Hsu D, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction. RAND J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawande A (2009) The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right (Metropolitan Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Hendee W, Herman M (2011) Improving patient safety in radiation oncology. Med. Phys. 38(1):78–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic equipment alignment industry. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):248–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark K (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber P (1989) Liability: The Legal Revolution and Its Consequences (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Jarrell G, Peltzman S (1985) The impact of product recalls on the wealth of sellers. J. Political Econom. 93(3):512–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klevorick A, Levin R, Nelson R, Winter S (1995) On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Res. Policy 24(2):195–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krieger J, Li X, Thakor RT (2018) Find and replace: R&D investment following the erosion of existing products. Harvard Business School Working Paper 19-058, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Lee C, Haims A, Monico E, Brink J, Forman H (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: Assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231(2):393–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Levy F (2012) The sharp slowdown in growth of medical imaging: An early analysis suggests combination of policies was the cause. Health Affairs 31(8):1876–1884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Layperson M, Combs B (1978) Judged frequency of lethal events. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Learn. 4(6):551–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahesh M (2016) What is the CT dose check standard, and why do CT scanners need to be in compliance? J. Amer. College Radiology 13(1):64–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo-Smith W, Hara A, Mahesh M, Sahani D, Pavlicek W (2014) How I do it: Managing radiation dose in CT. Radiology 273(3):657–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miao Q, Popp D (2014) Necessity as the mother of invention: Innovative responses to natural disasters. J. Environ. Econom. Management 68(2):280–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D, Rosenberg N (1979) The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Res. Policy 8(2):102–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelc N (2014) Recent and future directions in CT imaging. Ann. Biomedical Engrg. 42(2):260–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Giraldo J, Grant KL, Raupach R (2018) ADMIRE: Advanced modeled iterative reconstruction. White Paper, Siemens Healthcare, Malvern, PA.Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1974) Science, invention, and economic growth. Econom. J. 84(33):90–108.Google Scholar
• Scherer F, Ross D (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Schmalensee RL (1982) Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):349–365.Google Scholar
• Schmookler J (1966) Invention and Economic Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1982) Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 463–492.Google Scholar
• Sutton J (1998) Technology and Market Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Teece D (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thrall J (2012) Radiation exposure in CT scanning and risk: Where are we? Radiology 264(2):325–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback J, Abernathy W (1975) A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viscusi K (1993) The value of risks to life and health. J. Econom. Literature 31(4):1912–1946.Google Scholar
• Viscusi K, Moore M (1993) Product liability, research and development, and innovation. J. Political Econom. 101(1):161–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Link, Google Scholar
• Zwank M, Leow M, Anderson C (2014) Emergency department patient knowledge and physician communication regarding CT scans. J. Emergency Medicine 31(10):824–826.Crossref, Google Scholar