Making Marketplaces Safe: Dominant Individual Rationality and Applications to Market Design
Published Online:8 Dec 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3643
References
- (1999) House allocation with existing tenants. J. Econom. Theory 88(2):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The welfare effects of coordinated school assignment: Evidence from the NYC high school match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(12):3635–3689.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Free riding and participation in large scale, multi-hospital kidney exchange. Theor. Econom. 9(3):817–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Stability in large matching markets with complementarities. Oper. Res. 4(62):713–732.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Unbalanced random matching markets: The stark effect of competition. J. Polit. Econom. 125(1):69–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Mediators in position auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 67.1(2009):2–21.Google Scholar
- (2001) The market for federal judicial law clerks. Univ. Chicage Law Rev. 68(3):793–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Strategy-proofness in the large. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):81–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) A supply and demand framework for two-sided matching markets. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1235–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Improving efficiency of on-campus housing: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1669–1686.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Optimal truncation in matching markets. Games Econom. Behav. 87:591–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Unravelling of dynamic sorting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(4):1057–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Self-confidence and unraveling in matching markets. Management Sci. 65(12):5603–5618.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) “Rigidity of transfers and unraveling in matching markets.” Preprint, submitted December 9, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2203910.Google Scholar
- (2016) Strategic complementarities and unraveling in matching markets. Theoret. Econom. 11(1):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Common enrollment in school choice. Theoret. Econom. 14(4):1237–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Adverse selection and unraveling in common-value labor markets. Theoret. Econom. 8(3):801–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) A folk theorem for Bayesian games with commitment. Games Econom. Behav. 78:64–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Unraveling yields inefficient matchings: Evidence from post-season college football bowls. RAND J. Econom. 38(4):967–982.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Directed search with multiple job applications. J. Econom. Theory 144(2):445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Constrained school choice. J. Econom. Theory 144(5):1921–1947.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Unravelling in two-sided matching markets and similarity of preferences. Games Econom. Behav. 69(2):365–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The dynamics of law clerk matching: An experimental and computational investigation of proposals for reform of the market. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 30(3):457–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Need vs. merit: The large core of college admissions markets. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.Google Scholar
- (2005) Marriage, honesty, and stability. Proc. 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 53–62.Google Scholar
- (2010) A commitment folk theorem. Games Econom. Behav. 69(1):127–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Robust mediators in large games. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- (2012) On two kinds of manipulation for school choice problems. Econom. Theory 53(3):677–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Efficiency of simultaneous search. J. Political Econom. 117(5):861–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Incentives and stability in large two-sided matching markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):608–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Matching with couples: Stability and incentives in large markets. Quart. J. Econom. 128(4):1585–1632.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Incentive compatability of large centralized matching markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(1):444–463.Google Scholar
- (1995) When are agents negligible? Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1160–1170.Google Scholar
- (2005) The collapse of a medical labor clearinghouse (and why such failures are rare). Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(3):878–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Strong mediated equilibrium. Artificial Intelligence 173(1):180–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2003) Unraveling reduces mobility in a labor market: Gastroenterology with and without a centralized match. J. Political Econ. 111(6):1342–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The gastroenterology fellowship match: How it failed and why it could succeed once again. Gastroenterology 127(2):658–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) What will be needed for the new gastroenterology fellowship match to succeed? Gastroenterology 130(1):218–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) What Really Matters in Designing School Choice Mechanisms What really matters in designing school choice mechanisms. Samuelson L, ed. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, 11th World Congress of the Econometric Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK). Google Scholar
- (2010) Implementation by mediated equilibrium. Internat. J. Game Theory 39(1–2):191–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: A case study in game theory. J. Political Econom. 92(6):991–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) On the allocation of residents to rural hospitals: A general property of two-sided matching markets. Econometrica 54(2):425–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):992–1044.Google Scholar
- (1999) Can pre-arranged matches be avoided in two-sided matching markets? J. Econom. Theory 86(1):148–156.Crossref, Google Scholar

