Making Marketplaces Safe: Dominant Individual Rationality and Applications to Market Design

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3643

References

  • Abdulkadiroglu A , Sönmez T (1999) House allocation with existing tenants. J. Econom. Theory 88(2):233–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abdulkadiroglu A , Agarwal N , Pathak P (2017) The welfare effects of coordinated school assignment: Evidence from the NYC high school match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(12):3635–3689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashlagi I , Roth AE (2014) Free riding and participation in large scale, multi-hospital kidney exchange. Theor. Econom. 9(3):817–863.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashlagi I , Braverman M , Hassidim A (2014) Stability in large matching markets with complementarities. Oper. Res. 4(62):713–732.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashlagi I , Kanoria Y , Leshno J (2017) Unbalanced random matching markets: The stark effect of competition. J. Polit. Econom. 125(1):69–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashlagi I , Monderer D , Tennenholtz M (2009) Mediators in position auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 67.1(2009):2–21.Google Scholar
  • Avery, C , Jolls C , Posner RA , Roth AE (2001) The market for federal judicial law clerks. Univ. Chicage Law Rev. 68(3):793–902.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azevedo E , Budish E (2018) Strategy-proofness in the large. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):81–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azevedo E , Leshno J (2016) A supply and demand framework for two-sided matching markets. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1235–1268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y , Sönmez T (2002) Improving efficiency of on-campus housing: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1669–1686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coles P , Shorrer R (2014) Optimal truncation in matching markets. Games Econom. Behav. 87:591–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damiano E , Li H , Suen W (2005) Unravelling of dynamic sorting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(4):1057–1076.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dargnies M-P , Hakimov R , Kübler D (2019) Self-confidence and unraveling in matching markets. Management Sci. 65(12):5603–5618.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Du S , Livne Y (2014) “Rigidity of transfers and unraveling in matching markets.” Preprint, submitted December 9, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2203910.Google Scholar
  • Echenique F , Pereyra JS (2016) Strategic complementarities and unraveling in matching markets. Theoret. Econom. 11(1):1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ekmekci M , Yenmez B (2019) Common enrollment in school choice. Theoret. Econom. 14(4):1237–1270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely JC , Siegel R (2013) Adverse selection and unraveling in common-value labor markets. Theoret. Econom. 8(3):801–827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forges F (2013) A folk theorem for Bayesian games with commitment. Games Econom. Behav. 78:64–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fréchette GR , Roth AE , Ünver MU (2007) Unraveling yields inefficient matchings: Evidence from post-season college football bowls. RAND J. Econom. 38(4):967–982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gale D , Shapley L (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelanianos M , Kircher P (2009) Directed search with multiple job applications. J. Econom. Theory 144(2):445–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haeringer G , Klijn F (2009) Constrained school choice. J. Econom. Theory 144(5):1921–1947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hałaburda H (2010) Unravelling in two-sided matching markets and similarity of preferences. Games Econom. Behav. 69(2):365–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haruvy E , Roth AE , Ünver MU (2006) The dynamics of law clerk matching: An experimental and computational investigation of proposals for reform of the market. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 30(3):457–486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hassidim A , Romm A , Shorrer RI (2018) Need vs. merit: The large core of college admissions markets. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.Google Scholar
  • Immorlica N , Mohammad M (2005) Marriage, honesty, and stability. Proc. 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 53–62.Google Scholar
  • Kalai A , Kalai E , Lehrer E , Samet D (2010) A commitment folk theorem. Games Econom. Behav. 69(1):127–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kearns M , Pai M , Rogers R , Roth A , Ullman J (2015) Robust mediators in large games. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Kesten O (2012) On two kinds of manipulation for school choice problems. Econom. Theory 53(3):677–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kircher P (2009) Efficiency of simultaneous search. J. Political Econom. 117(5):861–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kojima F , Pathak P (2009) Incentives and stability in large two-sided matching markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):608–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kojima F , Pathak P , Roth AE (2013) Matching with couples: Stability and incentives in large markets. Quart. J. Econom. 128(4):1585–1632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee SM (2016) Incentive compatability of large centralized matching markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(1):444–463.Google Scholar
  • Levine DK , Pesendorfer W (1995) When are agents negligible? Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1160–1170.Google Scholar
  • McKinney CN , Niederle M , and Roth AE (2005) The collapse of a medical labor clearinghouse (and why such failures are rare). Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(3):878–889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monderer D , Tennenholtz M (2009) Strong mediated equilibrium. Artificial Intelligence 173(1):180–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson, R (1991) Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Niederle M , Roth AE (2003) Unraveling reduces mobility in a labor market: Gastroenterology with and without a centralized match. J. Political Econ. 111(6):1342–1352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M , Roth AE (2004) The gastroenterology fellowship match: How it failed and why it could succeed once again. Gastroenterology 127(2):658–666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M , Proctor DD , Roth AE (2006) What will be needed for the new gastroenterology fellowship match to succeed? Gastroenterology 130(1):218–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pathak P (2016) What Really Matters in Designing School Choice Mechanisms What really matters in designing school choice mechanisms. Samuelson L, ed. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, 11th World Congress of the Econometric Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK). Google Scholar
  • Peleg B , Procaccia AD (2010) Implementation by mediated equilibrium. Internat. J. Game Theory 39(1–2):191–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE (1984) The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: A case study in game theory. J. Political Econom. 92(6):991–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE (1986) On the allocation of residents to rural hospitals: A general property of two-sided matching markets. Econometrica 54(2):425–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE , Xing X (1994) Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):992–1044.Google Scholar
  • Sönmez T (1999) Can pre-arranged matches be avoided in two-sided matching markets? J. Econom. Theory 86(1):148–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.