Gender Gaps in Equity Crowdfunding: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

References

• Abate L (2018) One year of equity crowdfunding: Initial market developments and trends. Report, U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):253–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H (1989) Networking among women entrepreneurs. Hagan O, Rivchun C, Sexton D, eds. Women-Owned Businesses (Praeger Publishing, New York), 103–132.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1998) What has economics to say about racial discrimination? J. Econom. Perspective 12(2):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balachandra L, Briggs T, Eddleston K, Brush C (2017) Don’t pitch like a girl! How gender stereotypes influence investor decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 43(1):116–137.Google Scholar
• Bapna S (2017) Complementarity of signals in early-stage equity investment decisions: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 65(2):933–952.Link, Google Scholar
• Barnett C (2013) Top 10 crowdfunding sites for fundraising. Forbes (May 8), http://www.forbes.com/sites/chancebarnett/2013/05/08/top-10-crowdfunding-sites-for-fundraising/.Google Scholar
• Baron RA, Ensley MD (2006) Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Sci. 52(9):1331–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker G (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Becker-Blease JR, Sohl JE (2007) Do women-owned businesses have equal access to angel capital? J. Bus. Venturing 22(4):503–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Korteweg A, Laws K (2017) Attracting early‐stage investors: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. J. Finance 72(2):509–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brashears ME (2008) Gender and homophily: Differences in male and female association in Blau space. Sociol. Sci. Res. 37(2):400–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brush C, Greene P, Balachandra L, Davis A (2018) The gender gap in venture capital—progress, problems, and perspectives. Venture Capitalism 20(2):115–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brush CG, Carter NM, Gatewood EJ, Greene PG, Hart M (2001) The Diana Project: Women business owners and equity capital: The myths dispelled. Report, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
• Brush CG, Carter NM, Gatewood EJ, Greene PG, Hart M (2004) Gatekeepers of venture growth: A Diana Project report on the role and participation of women in the venture capital industry. Report, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
• Brush CG, Carter NM, Gatewood EJ, Greene PG, Hart M (2014) Diana Report: Women Entrepreneurs 2014: Bridging the gender gap in venture capital. Report, Arthur M. Blank Center for Entrepreneurship, Babson College, Babson Park, MA.Google Scholar
• Carter S, Rosa P (1998) The financing of male- and female-owned businesses. Entrepreneur Regional Development 10(3):225–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Findley M, Jensen NM, Meier S, Nielson D (2016) Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37:116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cholakova M, Clarysse B (2015) Does the possibility to make equity investments in crowdfunding projects crowd out reward‐based investments? Entrepreneur Theory Practice 39(1):145–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choo F, Trotman KT (1991) The relationship between knowledge structure and judgments For experienced and inexperienced auditors. Accounting Rev. 66:464–485.Google Scholar
• Coleman S (2000) Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men-and women-owned small businesses. J. Small Bus. Management 38(3):37–52.Google Scholar
• Coleman S, Robb A (2009) A comparison of new firm financing by gender: Evidence from the Kauffman firm survey data. Small Bus. Econom. 33(4):397–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conroy RM (2012) What hypotheses do “nonparametric” two-group tests actually test? Stata J. 12(2):182–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantinidis C, Cornet A, Asandei S (2006) Financing of women-owned ventures: The impact of gender and other owner-and firm-related variables. Venture Capitalism 8(2):133–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derks B, Van Laar C, Ellemers N, De Groot K (2011) Gender-bias primes elicit queen-bee responses among senior policewomen. Psych. Sci. 22(10):1243–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai RM, Kharas H (2009) Democratizing foreign aid: Online philanthropy and international development assistance. Internat. Law Politics 42:1111.Google Scholar
• Duguid MM, Loyd DL, Tolbert PS (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organ. Sci. 23(2):386–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Durbin S (2016) Women Who Succeed: Strangers in Paradise (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Lerner J (2004) The Venture Capital Cycle (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gorman M, Sahlman WA (1989) What do venture capitalists do? J. Bus. Venturing 4(4):231–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Mollick E (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanmer MJ, Kalkan KO (2013) Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models. Amer. J. Political Sci. 57(1):263–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison RT, Mason C (2007) Does gender matter? Women business angels and the supply of entrepreneurial finance. Entrepreneur Theory Practice 31(3):445–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes-Roth B (1977) Evolution of cognitive structures and processes. Psych. Rev. 84(3):260–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2012) Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewstone M, Rubin M, Willis H (2002) Intergroup bias. Annu. Rev. Psych. 53(1):575–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hibbert AM, Lawrence ER, Prakash AJ (2013) Does knowledge of finance mitigate the gender difference in financial risk-aversion? Global Finance J. 24(2):140–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson MA, Stevenson RM, Letwin CR (2018) A woman’s place is in the… startup! Crowdfunder judgments, implicit bias, and the stereotype content model. J. Bus. Venturing 33(6):813–831.Google Scholar
• Jones EE, Nisbett RE (1971) The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Jones EE, Nisbett RE, eds. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ), 79–94.Google Scholar
• Kalil T, Rand D (2016) The promise of crowdfunding and American innovation. Accessed July 10, 2018, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/06/08/promise-crowdfunding-and-american-innovation.Google Scholar
• Kickstarter (2019) Kickstarter stats. Accessed July 12, 2019, http://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats.Google Scholar
• Kickstarter Creator Handbook (2019) Creator handbook building rewards. Accessed July 24, 2019, https://www.kickstarter.com/help/handbook/rewards.Google Scholar
• Kim L (2018) Top 10 crowdfunding platforms of 2018. Inc. Accessed July 11, 2019, https://www.inc.com/larry-kim/op-10-crowdfunding-platforms-of-2018.html.Google Scholar
• Kortum S, Lerner J (2000) Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):674–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LendingClub (2019) What are the requirements to become an investor? Accessed July 18, 2019, https://help.lendingclub.com/hc/en-us/articles/216092827-What-are-the-requirements-to-become-an-investor.Google Scholar
• Ly P, Mason G (2012) Competition between microfinance NGOs: Evidence from Kiva. World Deveopment 40(3):643–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marinelli N, Mazzoli C, Palmucci F (2017) How does gender really affect investment behavior? Econom. Lett. 151:58–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marom D, Robb A, Sade O (2016) Gender dynamics in crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on entrepreneurs, investors, deals and taste-based discrimination. Working paper, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
• Martucci B (2015) 10 equity crowdfunding sites for investors & entrepreneurs. Money Crashers. Accessed July 2019, https://www.moneycrashers.com/equity-crowdfunding-sites-investors-entrepreneurs/.Google Scholar
• Merrill Lynch (2015) Women and investing: A behavioral finance perspective. Accessed July 20, 2018, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/568aa781a976af7af9b0e2d3/t/57bcc1008419c2e717738aff/1471987970715/Women+and+Investing+Behavioral+Finance.Google Scholar
• Mohammadi A, Shafi K (2018) Gender differences in the contribution patterns of equity-crowdfunding investors. Small Bus. Econom. 50(2):275–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreau CP, Lehmann DR, Markman AB (2001) Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products. J. Marketing Res. 38(1):14–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neider L (1987) A preliminary investigation of female entrepreneurs in Florida. J. Small Bus. Management 25(3):22–29.Google Scholar
• Novick LR (1988) Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. J. Experiment. Psych. Learning Memory Cognition 14(3):510–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orser BJ, Riding AL, Manley K (2006) Women entrepreneurs and financial capital. Entrepreneur Theory Practice 30(5):643–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2011) What’s in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from Prosper.com. J. Human Resources 46(1):53–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prosper (2019) What you should know. Accessed February 4, 2019, https://www.prosper.com/invest.Google Scholar
• Sohl J (2018) The angel market in 2017: Angels remain bullish for seed and start-up investing. Report, Center for Venture Research, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
• Stead V, Elliott C (2009) Women’s Leadership (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stengel G (2018) How women angels are good for innovation and the economy. Forbes (June 6), https://www.forbes.com/sites/geristengel/2018/06/06/women-are-different-and-thats-good-for-innovation-and-the-economy/#7dfacb61a3c5.Google Scholar
• Visser PS, Krosnick JA, Lavrakas PJ (2000) Survey research. Reis HT, Judd CM, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (Cambridge University Press, New York), 223–252.Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bowen HP (2009) The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management J. 30(6):679–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kuppuswamy V (2017) The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 64(7):3269–3287.Link, Google Scholar