Competition Among Proprietary and Open-Source Software Firms: The Role of Licensing in Strategic Contribution

References

• Abbott L (1953) Vertical equilibrium under pure quality competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 43(5):826–845.Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Meyer RJ, Raju JS, Rapoport A (2000) Collaborating to compete. Marketing Sci. 19(2):105–126.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asundi J, Carare O, Dogan K (2012) Competitive implications of software open-sourcing. Decision Support Systems 54(1):153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Ellison G (2014) Dynamics of open source movements. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):294–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• August T, Shin H, Tunca TI (2013) Licensing and competition for services in open source software. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1068–1086.Link, Google Scholar
• August T, Shin H, Tunca TI (2017) Generating value through open source: Software service market regulation and licensing policy. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):186–205.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.Link, Google Scholar
• Beck T, Demirg-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (2005) Financial and legal constraints to growth: Does firm size matter? J. Finance 60(1):137–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckerman J (2016) Splunk tops revenue guidance and boosts year view. Wall Street Journal (February 25), https://www.wsj.com/articles/splunk-tops-revenue-guidance-and-boosts-year-view-1456436585.Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan V (2009) Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Sci. 55(7):1152–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Bitzer J (2004) Commercial vs. open source software: The role of product heterogeneity in competition. Econom. Systems 28(4):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow JI, Geanakoplos JD, Klemperer PD (1985) Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. 93(3):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Ghemawat P (2006) Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. 52(7):1072–1084.Link, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Llanes G (2011) Mixed source. Management Sci. 57(7):1212–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Chambers C, Kouvelis P, Semple J (2006) Quality-based competition, profitability, and variable costs. Management Sci. 52(12):1884–1895.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Liu Y, Tang QC (2011) The impact of network externalities on the competition between open source and proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(4):201–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JP (1993) Cooperative R&D with product market competition. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 11(4):553–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis B (1981) Substantiating programmer variability. Proc. IEEE 69(7):846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorroh JR, Gulledge TR, Womer NK (1994) Investment in knowledge: A generalization of learning by experience. Management Sci. 40(8):947–958.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JM, Thomas A (1984) Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):235–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Katsamakas E (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1057–1071.Link, Google Scholar
• Fine CH (1986) Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Sci. 32(10):1301–1315.Link, Google Scholar
• Hars A, Ou S (2002) Working for free? motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electr. Commerce 6(3):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harter DE, Slaughter SA (2003) Quality improvement and infrastructure activity costs in software development: A longitudinal analysis. Management Sci. 49(6):784–800.Link, Google Scholar
• Harter DE, Krishnan MS, Slaughter SA (2000) Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Sci. 46(4):451–466.Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Sethi SP, Zhou J (2008) Open source development with a commercial complementary product or service. Prod. Oper. Management 17(1):29–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho SY, Rai A (2017) Continued voluntary participation intention in firm-participating open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):603–625.Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.Link, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Richards GL (2006) The business of free software: Enterprise, incentives, investment, and motivation in the open source community. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Idson TL, Oi WY (1999) Workers are more productive in large firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(2):104–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaisingh J, See-To EWK, Tam KY (2008) The impact of open source software on the strategic choices of firms developing proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(3):241–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim BC, Chen P, Mukhopadhyay T (2006) Pricing open source software. Twenty Seventh Internat. Conf. Inform. Sys. (International Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, WI), 341–366Google Scholar
• Konrad A (2015) Meet confluent, the big-data startup that has Silicon Valley buzzing. Forbes (August 19), https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2015/08/19/why-confluent-data-has-silicon-valley-buzzing.Google Scholar
• Krishnan MS, Kriebel CH, Kekre S, Mukhopadhyay T (2000) An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Sci. 46(6):745–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1988) The dynamics of incentive contracts. Econometrica 56(5):1153–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Mendelson H (2008) Divide and conquer: Competing with free technology under network effects. Prod. Oper. Management 17(1):12–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2005a) The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(2):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2005b) The scope of open source licensing. J. Law Econom. Organ. 21(1):20–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy FK (1965) Adaptation in the production process. Management Sci. 11(6):B136–B154.Link, Google Scholar
• Levy T (2015) Is open source overtaking Splunk? Infoworld (November 4), https://www.infoworld.com/article/2998136/is-open-source-overtaking-splunk.html.Google Scholar
• Li L, McKelvey RD, Page T (1987) Optimal research for Cournot oligopolists. J. Econom. Theory 42(1):140–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• MacLeod WB, Malcomson JM (1993) Investments, holdup, and the form of market contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(4):811–837.Google Scholar
• McConnell S (2008) Productivity variations among software developers and teams: The origin of 10x. Accessed May 25, 2016, http://www.construx.com/10x_Software_Development/Productivity_Variations_Among_Software_Developers_and_Teams__The_Origin_of_10x/.Google Scholar
• Motta M (1993) Endogenous quality choice: Price vs. quantity competition. J. Indust. Econom. 41(2):113–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller HM (2000) Asymptotic efficiency in dynamic principal-agent problems. J. Econom. Theory 91(2):292–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mustonen M (2005) When does a firm support substitute open source programming? J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(1):121–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oi WY (1983) Heterogeneous firms and the organization of production. Econom. Inquiry 21(2):147–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• OSI (2014) Open source licenses. Accessed May 4, 2014, http://opensource.org/licenses.Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer W, Swinkels JM (2000) Efficiency and information aggregation in auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(3):499–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanski A (2007) Is the general public licence a rational choice? J. Indust. Econom. 55(4):691–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Hann IH, Slaughter SA (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the apache projects. Management Sci. 52(7):984–999.Link, Google Scholar
• Scacchi W, Hurley D (1995) Understanding software productivity. Hurley WD, ed. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: Trends for the Next Decade, vol. 4 (World Scientific, Singapore), 273–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen R (2007) A strategic analysis of competition between open source and proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(1):233–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Phelps C (2013) Networks, social influence, and the choice among competing innovations: Insights from open source software licenses. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):539–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1981) The learning curve and competition. Bell J. Econom. 12(1):49–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• St. Laurent AM (2004) Understanding Open Source and Free Software Licensing (O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA).Google Scholar
• Tambe P (2014) Big data investment, skills, and firm value. Management Sci. 60(6):1452–1469.Link, Google Scholar
• Turley RT, Bieman JM (1995) Competencies of exceptional and nonexceptional software engineers. J. Systems Software 28(1):19–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vereshchagina G, Hopenhayn HA (2009) Risk taking by entrepreneurs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1808–1830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975–983.Link, Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Beil DR (2009) RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. 57(4):934–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Watson RT, Boudreau MC, York PT, Greiner MEJr, Wynn D (2008) The business of open source. Commun. ACM 51(4):41–46.Google Scholar
• Wen W, Forman C, Graham SJH (2013) The impact of intellectual property rights enforcement on open source software project success. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1131–1146.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu KX, Zhou ZZ (2012) Lock-in strategy in software competition: Open-source software vs. proprietary software. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):536–545.Link, Google Scholar