Assortment Optimization Under Consider-Then-Choose Choice Models

References

• Akaike H (1998) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Parzen E , Tanabe K , Kitagawa G , eds. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike (Springer, New York), 199–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aouad A , Farias V , Levi R , Segev D (2018) The approximability of assortment optimization under ranking preferences. Oper. Res. 66(6):1661–1669.Link, Google Scholar
• Belonax JA Jr , Mittelstaedt Y (1978) Evoked set size as a function of number of choice criteria and information variability. Hunt K , ed. Advances in Consumer Research , vol. 5 (Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI), 48–51.Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva ME , Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , vol. 9 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D , Mišić VV (2019) Exact first-choice product line optimi‐zation. Oper. Res. 67(3):651–670.Google Scholar
• Bettman JR , Luce MF , Payne JW (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. 25(3):187–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchet J , Gallego G , Goyal V (2013) A Markov chain approximation to choice modeling. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 103–104.Google Scholar
• Brandstatter E , Gigerenzer G , Hertwig R (2006) The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psych. Rev. 113(2):409–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brisoux JE , Laroche M (1981) Evoked set formation and composition: An empirical investigation under a routinized response behavior situation. Monroe KB , ed. Advances in Consumer Research , vol. 8 (Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI), 357–361.Google Scholar
• Bront JJM , Méndez-Díaz I , Vulcano G (2009) A column generation algorithm for choice-based network revenue management. Oper. Res. 57(3):769–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell BM (1969) The existence of evoked set and determinants of its magnitude in brand choice behavior. PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Davis J , Gallego G , Topaloglu H (2013) Assortment planning under the multinomial logit model with totally unimodular constraint structures. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Davis JM , Gallego G , Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under variants of the nested logit model. Oper. Res. 62(2):250–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawes RM (1979) The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psych. 34(7):571–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debreu G (1960) Review of R. D. Luce, Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis . Amer. Econom. Rev. 50(1):186–188.Google Scholar
• Désir A , Goyal V (2014) Near-optimal algorithms for capacity constrained assortment optimization. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Edmonds J , Giles R (1977) A min-max relation for submodular functions on graphs. Ann. Discrete Math. 1:185–204.Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ , Hogarth RM (1975) Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 13(2):171–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farias V , Jagabathula S , Shah D (2013) A non-parametric approach to modeling choice with limited data. Management Sci. 59(2):305–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher ML , Vaidyanathan R (2014) A demand estimation procedure for retail assortment optimization with results from implementations. Management Sci. 60(10):2401–2415.Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G , Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G , Selten R (2002) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbride TJ , Allenby GM (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. 23(3):391–406.Link, Google Scholar
• Gurobi Optimization (2015) Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual, Version 6.5 (Gurobi Optimization, Beaverton, OR).Google Scholar
• Hauser JR (1978) Testing the accuracy, usefulness and significance of probabilistic models: An information theoretic approach. Oper. Res. 26(3):406–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR , Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR , Ding M , Gaskin SP (2009) Non-compensatory (and compensatory) models of consideration-set decisions. Proc. 14th Sawtooth Software Conf. (Sawtooth Software, Provo, UT), 207–232.Google Scholar
• Honhon D , Jonnalagedda S , Pan XA (2012) Optimal algorithms for assortment selection under ranking-based consumer choice models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):279–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard JA , Sheth JN (1969) The Theory of the Buyer Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Jagabathula S , Rusmevichientong P (2016) A nonparametric joint assortment and price choice model. Management Sci. 63(9):3128–3145.Link, Google Scholar
• Kök, A G, Fisher ML (2007) Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Oper. Res. 55(6):1001–1021.Link, Google Scholar
• Kök A G, Fisher ML , Vaidyanathan R (2009) Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Agrawal N , Smith SA , eds. Retail Supply Chain Management (Springer, Boston), 99–153.Google Scholar
• Lancaster K (1975) Socially optimal product differentiation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 65(4):567–585.Google Scholar
• Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J. Political Econom. 74(2):132–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laroche M , Kim C , Matsui T (2003) Which decision heuristics are used in consideration set formation? J. Consumer Marketing 20(3):192–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G , Rusmevichientong P , Topaloglu H (2015) The d-level nested logit model: Assortment and price optimization problems. Oper. Res. 63(2):325–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan S , Van Ryzin G (2001) Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Oper. Res. 49(3):334–351.Link, Google Scholar
• McFadden D , Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econometrics 15(5):447–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW , Bettman J , James R , Luce MF (1996) When time is money: Decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 66(2):131–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentico DW (1974) The assortment problem with probabilistic demands. Management Sci. 21(3):286–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Posavac SS , Meyer T , Kardes FR , Kellaris JJ (2005) A selective hypothesis testing perspective on price-quality inference and inference-based choice. J. Consumer Psych. 15(2):159–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pras B , Summers J (1975) A comparison of linear and nonlinear evaluation process models. J. Marketing Res. 12(3):276–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratliff RM , Rao BV , Narayan CP , Yellepeddi K (2008) A multi-flight recapture heuristic for estimating unconstrained demand from airline bookings. J. Revenue Pricing Management 7(2):153–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reilly M , Parkinson TL (1985) Individual and product correlates of evoked set size for consumer package goods. Hirschman EC , Holbrook MB , eds. Advances in Consumer Research , vol. 12 (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), 492–497.Google Scholar
• Roberts JH , Lattin JM (1991) Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):429–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P , Topaloglu H (2012) Robust assortment optimization in revenue management under the multinomial logit choice model. Oper. Res. 60(4):865–882.Link, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P , Shen Z-JM , Shmoys DB (2010) Dynamic assortment optimization with a multinomial logit choice model and capacity constraint. Oper. Res. 58(6):1666–1680.Link, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P , Shmoys D , Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with random choice parameters. Production Oper. Management 23(11):2023–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichiengtong P , Van Roy B , Glynn PW (2006) Nonparametric approach to multiproduct pricing. Oper. Res. 54(1):82–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Silk AJ , Urban GL (1978) Pre-test-market evaluation of new packaged goods: A model and measurement methodology. J. Marketing Res. 15(2):171–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri K , van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri KT , Van Ryzin GJ (2006) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (Springer, Boston).Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1972a) Choice by elimination. J. Math. Psych. 9(4):341–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1972b) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. 79(4):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A , Kahneman D (1975) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Wendt D , Vlek C , eds. Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 141–163.Google Scholar
• Tversky A , Sattath S (1979) Preference trees. Psych. Rev. 86(6):542–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban GL (1975) Perceptor: A model for product positioning. Management Sci. 21(8):858–871.Link, Google Scholar
• van Ryzin G , Vulcano G (2014) A market discovery algorithm to estimate a general class of nonparametric choice models. Management Sci. 61(2):281–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Vulcano G , van Ryzin G , Chaar W (2010) Choice-based revenue management: An empirical study of estimation and optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):371–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perception of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing 52(3):2–22.Crossref, Google Scholar