Joint vs. Separate Crowdsourcing Contests

References

• Acemoglu D, Mostagir M, Ozdaglar A (2014) Managing innovation in a crowd. NBER Working Paper No. 19852, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho SH, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho SH, Körpeoğlu E (2019) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277215.Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Bergstrom T (2005) Log-concave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory 26(2):445–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Chakraborty I (1999) Bundling decisions for selling multiple objects. Econom. Theory 13(3):723–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che YK, Gale I (2003) Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):646–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Mihm J, Schlapp J (2018) Sourcing innovation: Integrated system or individual components? https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3252967.Google Scholar
• Choi JP (1991) Dynamic R&D competition under “hazard rate” uncertainty. RAND J. Econom. 22(4):596–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark DJ, Riis C (1998) Competition over more than one prize. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):276–289.Google Scholar
• DiPalantino D, Vojnovic M (2009) Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions. Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 119–128.Google Scholar
• Dixit A (1987) Strategic behavior in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77(5):891–898.Google Scholar
• Fey M (2008) Rent-seeking contests with incomplete information. Public Choice 135(3–4):225–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fullerton RL, McAfee RP (1999) Auctionin entry into tournaments. J. Political Econom. 107(3):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Goltsman M, Mukherjee A (2011) Interim performance feedback in multistage tournaments: The optimality of partial disclosure. J. Labor Econom. 29(2):229–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halac M, Kartik N, Liu Q (2017) Contests for experimentation. J. Political Econom. 125(5):1523–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris C, Vickers J (1987) Racing with uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausch DB (1986) Multi-object auctions: Sequential vs. simultaneous sales. Management Sci. 32(12):1599–1610.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Shi M, Wu J (2013) Simultaneous vs. sequential group-buying mechanisms. Management Sci. 59(12):2805–2822.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Huang Y, Beil DR (2019) The role of feedback in dynamic crowdsourcing contests: A structural empirical analysis. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2884922.Google Scholar
• Kalra A, Shi M (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Konrad KA (2007) Strategy in contests: An introduction. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960458.Google Scholar
• Konrad KA, Kovenock D (2009) Multi-battle contests. Games Econom. Behav. 66(1):256–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Körpeoğlu CG, Hafalir IE (2018) Parallel innovation contests. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2924817.Google Scholar
• Krishna V (2009) Auction Theory (Academic Press, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohr S (2012) Pentagon pushes crowdsourced manufacturing. New York Times (April 5), https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/pentagon-pushes-crowdsourced-manufacturing/.Google Scholar
• Malueg DA, Tsutsui SO (1997) Dynamic R&D competition with learning. RAND J. Econom. 28(4):751–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2006) Contest architecture. J. Econom. Theory 126(1):70–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1986) Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):701–715.Google Scholar
• Stouras KI (2018) Crowdsourcing contests with private types and evaluation uncertainty. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076067.Google Scholar
• Stouras KI, Girotra K, S Netessine (2015) First ranked first to serve: Strategic agents in a service contest. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2696868.Google Scholar
• Stouras KI, Hutchison-Krupat J, Chao RO (2019) The role of participation in innovation contests. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2924224.Google Scholar
• Taylor CR (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Yildirim H (2005) Contests with multiple rounds. Games Econom. Behav. 51(1):213–227.Crossref, Google Scholar