An Axiomatization of the Proportional Rule in Financial Networks
Published Online:5 Oct 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3700
References
- (2015) Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):564–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Coalitional manipulations in a bankruptcy problem. Rev. Econom. Design 4(3):255–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Flow sharing and bankruptcy games. Internat. J. Game Theory 39(1–2):11–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Liability concentration and systemic losses in financial networks. Oper. Res. 64(5):1121–1134.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) An axiomatic approach to systemic risk. Management Sci. 59(6):1373–1388.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Liquidity risk and contagion. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 3(2/3):556–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Decentralized clearing in financial networks. Management Sci. 64(10):4681–4699.Link, Google Scholar
- (1987) Bankruptcy games. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 31:A143–A159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Contagion in financial networks: A threat index. Management Sci. 2018(2):955–970.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Does a central clearing counterparty reduce counterparty risk? Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 1(1):74–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Sci. 47(2):236–249.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Financial networks and contagion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3115–3153.Google Scholar
- (2006) Risk assessment for banking systems. Management Sci. 52(9):1301–1314.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) The history of the general principle of proportionality: An overview. Dartmouth Law J. 10(1):1–11.Google Scholar
- (2019) Priority and proportionality in bankruptcy. Social Choice Welfare 54:559–579.Google Scholar
- (2010) Contagion in financial networks. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A Math. Phys. Engrg. Sci. 466(2120):2401–2423.Google Scholar
- (2015) How likely is contagion in financial networks? J. Banking Finance 50:383–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Contagion in financial networks. J. Econom. Lit. 54(3):779–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) On solving mutual liability problems. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 87(3):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations. J. Econom. Theory 132(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) ‘Hydraulic’ rationing. Math. Social Sci. 40(2):131–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Proportionality and non-manipulability in bankruptcy problems. Internat. Game Theory Rev. 8(1):127–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods. Internat. J. Game Theory 16(3):161–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Entropy, desegregation, and proportional rationing. J. Econom. Theory 162:1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The bipartite rationing problem. Oper. Res. 61(5):1087–1100.Link, Google Scholar
- (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math. Social Sci. 2(4):345–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Failure and rescue in an interbank network. Management Sci. 59(4):882–898.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Default ambiguity: Credit default swaps create new systemic risks in financial networks. Management Sci. 66(5):1981–1998.Google Scholar
- (2008) Risk and liquidity in a system context. J. Financial Intermediation 17(3):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) On probabilistic rationing methods. Math. Social Sci. 44(2):211–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: Recent advances. Internat. Game Theory Rev. 15(3):1340018.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update. Math. Social Sci. 74:41–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. J. Financial Stability 7(3):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Distributive justice in taxation. J. Econom. Theory 44(2):321–335.Crossref, Google Scholar

