Social Media and Political Contributions: The Impact of New Technology on Political Competition

References

• Acemoglu D, Hassan TA, Tahoun A (2017) The power of the street: Evidence from Egypt’s Arab Spring. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-u relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Elder TE, Taber CR (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. J. Political Econom. 113(1):151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, Snyder JM (2000) Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage. Amer. J. Political Sci. 44(1):17–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, Lessem R, Snyder JM (2006a) The orientation of newspaper endorsements in US elections, 1940–2002. Quart. J. Political Sci. 1(4):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, Snowberg EC, Snyder JM (2006b) Television and the incumbency advantage in US elections. Legislative Stud. Quart. 31(4):469–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens GW (2018) Design-based analysis in difference-in-differences settings with staggered adoption. NBER Working Paper 24963, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner JC, Morris JS (2010) Who wants to be my friend? Obama, youth and social networks in the 2008 campaign. Hendricks JA, Denton R, eds. Communicator-in-Chief: How Barack Obama Used New Media Technology to Win the White House (Lexington, Plymouth, UK), 51–66.Google Scholar
• Besley T, Persson T, Sturm DM (2010) Political competition, policy and growth: Theory and evidence from the US. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1329–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger BK, Cohen MA, Lai J (2013) Measuring asymmetric persistence and interaction effects of media exposures across platforms. Preprint, submitted October 11, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2342349.Google Scholar
• Boyd D, Marwick A (2011) Social privacy in networked publics: Teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies. A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society (International Communication Association, Boston).Google Scholar
• Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2010) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Donelan H, Kear K, Ramage M, eds. Online Communication and Collaboration: A Reader (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 261–281.Google Scholar
• Campante FR, Durante R, Sobbrio F (2013) Politics 2.0: The multifaceted effect of broadband Internet on political participation. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 16(4):1094–1136.Google Scholar
• Carson JL, Engstrom EJ, Roberts JM (2007) Candidate quality, the personal vote, and the incumbency advantage in Congress. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 101(2):289–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang C-F, Knight B (2011) Media bias and influence: Evidence from newspaper endorsements. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(3):795–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke P, Evans SH (1983) Covering Campaigns: Journalism in Congressional Elections (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Cox GW, Katz JN (1996) Why did the incumbency advantage in US House elections grow? Amer. J. Political Sci. 40(2):478–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culotta A, Cutler J (2016) Mining brand perceptions from twitter social networks. Marketing Sci. 35(3):343–362.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2010) Persuasion: Empirical evidence. Annual Rev. Econom. 2(1):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Kaplan ED (2007) The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1187–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisensee T, Strömberg D (2007) News droughts, news floods, and US disaster relief. Quart. J. Econom. 122(2):693–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelberg JE, Parsons CA (2011) The causal impact of media in financial markets. J. Finance 66(1):67–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enikolopov R, Makarin A, Petrova M (2020) Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia. Econometrica 88(4):1479–1514.Google Scholar
• Enikolopov R, Petrova M, Zhuravskaya E (2011) Media and political persuasion: Evidence from Russia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):3253–3285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang L, Peress J (2009) Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns. J. Finance 64(5):2023–2052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraz C, Finan F (2011) Electoral accountability and corruption: Evidence from the audits of local governments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1274–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1985) Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev. Econom. Stud. 52(3):383–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Gilbert R, Stiglitz J, Tirole J (1983) Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races. Eur. Econom. Rev. 22(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso V, Nannicini T (2011) Competing on good politicians. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 105(1):79–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E, Geylani T, Yildirim P (2012) The impact of advertising on media bias. J. Marketing Res. 49(1):92–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Goldfarb A, Lederman M (2016) Exit, tweets, and loyalty. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Garcia-Jimeno C, Yildirim P (2015) Matching pennies on the campaign trail: An empirical study of senate elections and media coverage. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM, Sinkinson M (2011) The effect of newspaper entry and exit on electoral politics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):2980–3018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM, Sinkinson M (2014) Competition and ideological diversity: Historical evidence from US newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3073–3114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Green DP (2000) The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 94(03):653–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh K-Y, Hui K-L, Png IP (2011) Newspaper reports and consumer choice: Evidence from the Do Not Call Registry. Management Sci. 57(9):1640–1654.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg EN, Traugott MW (1980) Congressional campaign effects on candidate recognition and evaluation. Political Behav. 2(1):61–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong S, Zhang J, Zhao P, Jiang X (2017) Tweeting as a marketing tool: A field experiment in the TV industry. J. Marketing Res. 54(6):833–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Hartmann WR (2013) Advertising effects in presidential elections. Marketing Sci. 32(1):19–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Hartmann WR (2016) Advertising competition in presidential elections. Quant. Marketing Econom. 14(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Lovett MJ, Shachar R, Arceneaux K, Moorthy S, Peress M, Rao A, Sen S, Soberman D, Urminsky O (2012) Marketing and politics: Models, behavior, and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 23(2):391–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gueorguieva V (2008) Voters, Myspace, and Youtube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 26(3):288–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman DL, Fodor M (2010) Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 52(1):41–49.Google Scholar
• Hong S, Nadler D (2011). Does the early bird move the polls?: The use of the social media tool Twitter by US politicians and its impact on public opinion. Bertot J, Chun SA, Reyes LFL, Atluri V, eds. Proc. 12th Annual Internat. Digital Government Res. Conf.: Digital Government Innovation Challenging Times (ACM), 182–186.Google Scholar
• Jacobsen GC (1987) The marginals never vanished: Incumbency and competition in elections to the US House of Representatives, 1952–1982. Amer. J. Political Sci. 31(1):126–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson GC, Kernell S (1982) Strategy and choice in the 1982 congressional elections. PS Political Sci. Politics 15(3):423–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen R, Oster E (2009) The power of TV: Cable television and women’s status in India. Quart. J. Econom. 124(3):1057–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson TJ, Perlmutter DD (2010) Introduction: The Facebook election. Mass Comm. Soc. 13(5):554–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos A (2017) Following politicians in social media. Report, Reuter Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Kinder-Kurlanda K, Weller K, Zenk-Moltgen W, Pfeffer J, Morstatter F (2017) Archiving information from geotagged tweets to promote reproducibility and comparability in social media research. Big Data Soc. 4(2):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Bhaskaran V, Mirchandani R, Shah M (2013) Creating a measurable social media marketing strategy: Increasing the value and ROI of intangibles and tangibles for hokey pokey. Marketing Sci. 32(2):194–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Kushin MJ, Yamamoto M (2010) Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Comm. Soc. 13(5):608–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Ferrara E, Chong A, Duryea S (2012) Soap operas and fertility: Evidence from Brazil. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 4(4):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laroche M, Habibi MR, Richard M-O (2013) To be or not to be in social media: How brand loyalty is affected by social media? Internat. J. Inform. Management 33(1):76–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lassen DS, Brown AR (2010) Twitter: The electoral connection? Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 29(4):419–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, Wolfram CD (1997) Decomposing the sources of incumbency advantage in the US House. Legislative Stud. Quart. 22(1):45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma L, Sun B, Kekre S (2015) The squeaky wheel gets the grease - an empirical analysis of customer voice and firm intervention on Twitter. Marketing Sci. 34(5):627–645.Link, Google Scholar
• Marwick AE, Boyd D (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media Soc. 13(1):114–133.Google Scholar
• Metaxas PT, Eni M (2012) Social media and the elections. Science 338(6106):472–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metzgar E, Maruggi A (2009) Social media and the 2008 US presidential election. J. New Comm. Res. 4(1):141–165.Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1993) Incentives to cultivate favored minorities under alternative electoral systems. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 87(4):856–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naylor RW, Lamberton CP, West PM (2012) Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. J. Marketing 76(6):105–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1974) Advertising as information. J. Political Econom. 82(4):729–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pei Z, Pischke J-S, Schwandt H (2019) Poorly measured confounders are more useful on the left than on the right. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):205–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Boyd RL, Jordan K, Blackburn K (2015) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015 (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX).Google Scholar
• Persson T, Tabellini G, Trebbi F (2003) Electoral rules and corruption. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):958–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prat A (2002) Campaign advertising and voter welfare. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(4):999–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prior M (2006) The incumbent in the living room: The rise of television and the incumbency advantage in US House elections. J. Politics 68(3):657–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qin B (2013) Chinese microblogs and drug quality. Working paper, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
• Qin B, Strömberg D, Wu Y (2017) Why does China allow freer social media? Protests versus surveillance and propaganda. J. Econom. Perspectives 31(1):117–140.Google Scholar
• Rosenthal H, Sen S (1969) Candidate selection and voting behavior in France. Public Choice 6(1):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal H, Sen S (1973) Electoral participation in the French Fifth Republic. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 67(1):29–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal H, Sen S (1977) Spatial voting models for the French Fifth Republic. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 71(4):1447–1466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotesi T (2019) The impact of Twitter on political participation. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
• Seiler S, Yao S, Wang W (2017) Does online word of mouth increase demand? (And how?) Evidence from a natural experiment. Marketing Sci. 36(6):838–861.Google Scholar
• Smith A (2011) Why Americans Use Social Media (Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Smith A, Rainie L (2008) The Internet and the 2008 election (Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Snyder JM Jr, Strömberg D (2010) Press coverage and political accountability. J. Political Econom. 118(2):355–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soberman D, Sadoulet L (2007) Campaign spending limits and political advertising. Management Sci. 53(10):1521–1532.Link, Google Scholar
• Spenkuch JL, Toniatti D (2016) Political advertising and election outcomes. Preprint, submitted April 1, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2613987.Google Scholar
• Strömberg D (2004) Mass media competition, political competition, and public policy. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(1):265–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Towner TL, Dulio DA (2012) New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond. J. Political Marketing 11(1–2):95–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban C, Niebler S (2014) Dollars on the sidewalk: Should US presidential candidates advertise in uncontested states? Amer. J. Political Sci. 58(2):322–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Virk AS (2011) Twitter: The strength of weak ties. University Auckland Bus. Rev. 13(1):19.Google Scholar
• Xiang Y, Sarvary M (2007) News consumption and media bias. Marketing Sci. 26(5):611–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Xiong R, Athey S, Bayati M, Imbens G (2019). Optimal experimental design for staggered rollouts. Preprint, submitted November 9, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03764.Google Scholar
• Yildirim P, Gal-Or E, Geylani T (2013) User-generated content and bias in news media. Management Sci. 59(12):2655–2666.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Johnson TJ, Seltzer T, Bichard SL (2010) The revolution will be networked the influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 28(1):75–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Dukes A (2015) Selective reporting of factual content by commercial media. J. Marketing Res. 52(1):56–76.Crossref, Google Scholar