What Determines the Return to Bribery? Evidence from Corruption Cases Worldwide
Published Online:8 Dec 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3763
References
- (2008) How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us? Accessed September 9, 2010, www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journal.Google Scholar
- (1997) National champions and corruption: Some unpleasant interventionist arithmetic. Econom. J. (London) 107(443):1023–1042.Google Scholar
- (1999) Rents, competition, and corruption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(4):982–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Bribe payments and innovation in developing countries: Are innovating firms disproportionately affected? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 49(1):51–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Tangible information and citizen empowerment: Identification cards and food subsidy programs in Indonesia. J. Political Econom. 126(2):451–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Corruption and development: A review of issues. J. Econom. Literature 35(3):1320–1346.Google Scholar
- (1996) The effects of cross-sectional scale differences on regression results in empirical accounting research. Contemporary Accounting Res. 13(2):527–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets. Econom. Lett. 20(1):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):67–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3885–3920.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Obtaining a driver’s license in India: An experimental approach to studying corruption. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1639–1676.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) DUP activities and economic theory. Eur. Econom. Rev. 24(3):291–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Votes or money? Theory and evidence from the US Congress. J. Public Econom. 95(7–8):587–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Competition and political organization: Together or alone in lobbying for trade policy? J. Internat. Econom. 87(1):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The iceberg theory of campaign contributions: Political threats and interest group behavior. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 5(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. J. Financial Econom. 88(3):554–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Conducting event studies with Asia-Pacific security market data. Pacific Basin Finance J. 16(5):493–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Executives “off-the-job” behavior, corporate culture, and financial reporting risk. J. Financial Econom. 117(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Academic earmarks and the returns to lobbying. J. Law Econom. 49(2):597–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The structure and conduct of corporate lobbying: How firms lobby the Federal Communications Commission. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(1):91–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Disclosure by politicians. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(2):179–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) What do corruption indices measure? Econom. Politics 26(2):309–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Who bribes in public contracting and why? Worldwide evidence from firms. Econom. Governance 14:333–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Political connections and corporate bailouts. J. Finance 61(6):2597–2635.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Public governance and corporate finance: Evidence from corruption cases. J. Comparative Econom. 36(3):343–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Estimating the value of political connections. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):1095–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. J. Development Econom. 83(1):63–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Dodging the grabbing hand: The determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. J. Public Econom. 76(3):459–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(2):354–358.Google Scholar
- (2009) Financial integration and firm performance: Evidence from foreign bank entry in emerging markets. Rev. Finance 13(2):181–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Politically connected boards of directors and the allocation of procurement contracts. Rev. Finance 17(5):1617–1648.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The incidence of graft on developing-country firms. Working paper 4394, World Bank Policy Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2016) An analysis of firms’ self-reported anticorruption efforts. Accounting Rev. 91(2):489–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Far from home: Do foreign investors import higher standards of governance in transition economies? Working paper, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
- (2001) Corruption: A review. J. Econom. Surveys 15(1):71–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The Jeffords effect. J. Law Econom. 49(2):397–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Jeong Y, Siegel J (2018) Threat of falling high status and corporate bribery: Evidence from the revealed accounting records of two South Korean presidents. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1083–1111.Google Scholar
- (2012) Who bribes? Evidence from the United Nations’ Oil-for-Food program. Strategic Management J. 33(12):1363–1383.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The unofficial economy in transition. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1997(2):159–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):387–392.Google Scholar
- (2000) Does “grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? Working paper 00/64, IMF, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2010) Bribery: Business as usual? Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
- (2017) Foreign bribery: Incentives and enforcement. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
- (1995) Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Econom. Politics 7(3):207–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quart. J. Econom. 120(4):1371–1411.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Measuring corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A critique of the cross-country indicators. Working paper 3968, World Bank Policy Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (1964) Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. Amer. Behav. Sci. 8(3):8–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. J. Political Econom. 93(4):760–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Corruption and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 110(3):681–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The effects of corruption on growth, investment and government expenditure: A cross country analysis. Elliot KA , ed. Corruption and the Global Economy (Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC), 83–107.Google Scholar
- (2004) How to subvert democracy: Montesinos in Peru. J. Econom. Perspect. 18(4):69–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. Quart. J. Econom. 106(2):503–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
- OECD Working Group on Bribery (2007) Annual report 2007, OECD Publications, Paris.Google Scholar
- (2007) Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. J. Political Econom. 115(2):200–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality. J. Public Econom. 93(7–8):950–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Corruption in developing countries. Annual Rev. Econom. 4:479–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Perceptions of corruption and campaign finance: When public opinion determines constitutional law. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 153:119–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Cheap bribes and the corruption ban: A coordination game among rational legislators. Public Choice 78(3/4):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Local capture: Evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):679–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Fighting corruption to improve schooling: Evidence from a newspaper campaign in Uganda. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 3(2–3):259–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The effects of government ownership on bank lending. J. Financial Econom. 72(2):357–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Corporate reputation’s invisible hand: Bribery, rational choice, and market penalties. J. Bus. Ethics 151:743–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Corruption. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):599–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Politicians and firms. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):995–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (1984) An investigation of the information content of foreign sensitive payment disclosures. J. Accounting Econom. 6(2):153–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross section of firms. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):207–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Eight questions about corruption. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(3):19–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Corruption, public investment, and growth. Working paper 97/139, IMF, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (1990) The costs of special privilege. Alt J , Shepsle K , eds. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK). 195–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) How taxing is corruption on international investors? Rev. Econom. Statist. 82(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Bribes and firm value. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(5):1457–1489.Crossref, Google Scholar

