Facilitating the Search for Partners on Matching Platforms

References

• Allon G , Bassamboo A , Cil E (2012) Large-scale service marketplaces: The role of the moderating firm. Management Sci. 58(10):1854–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Arnosti N , Johari R , Kanoria Y (2014) Managing congestion in matching markets. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 451–451.Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I , Burq M , Jaillet P , Manshadi V (2019) On matching and thickness in heterogeneous dynamic markets. Oper. Res. 67(4):927–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Balseiro SR , Besbes O , Weintraub GY (2015) Repeated auctions with budgets in ad exchanges: Approximations and design. Management Sci. 61(4):864–884.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S , Freund D , Lykouris T (2017) Pricing and optimization in shared vehicle systems: An approximation framework. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC '17) (ACM, New York), 517–517.Google Scholar
• Banerjee S , Johari R , Riquelme C (2015) Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Proc 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 639.Google Scholar
• Bertsekas D (2007) Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control , vol. 2, 3rd ed. (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
• Chade H , Eeckhout J , Smith L (2017) Sorting through search and matching models in economics. J. Econom. Literature 55(2):493–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles P , Kushnir A , Niederle M (2013) Preference signaling in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 5(2):99–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles P , Cawley J , Levine PB , Niederle M , Roth AE , Siegfried JJ (2010) The job market for new economists: A market design perspective. J. Econom. Perspective 24(4):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook J (2017) There is a secret ‘success rate’ hidden in all your tinder photos. Accessed October 16, 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com/tinder-secret-success-rate-photos-right-swipe-percentage-2017-3?r=UK\&IR=T.Google Scholar
• Cullen Z , Farronato C (2020) Outsourcing tasks online: Matching supply and demand on peer-to-peer Internet platforms. Management Sci, ePub ahead of print October 7, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3730.Google Scholar
• Diamond PA (1981) Mobility costs, frictional unemployment, and efficiency. J. Political Econom. 89(4):798–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond PA (1982a) Aggregate demand management in search equilibrium. J. Political Econom. 90(5):881–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond PA (1982b) Wage determination and efficiency in search equilibrium. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(2):217–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drakopoulos K , Jain S , Randhawa RS (2020) Persuading customers to buy early: The value of personalized information provisioning. Management Sci. , ePub ahead of print August 14, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3580.Google Scholar
• Duffie D , Malamud S , Manso G (2009) Information percolation with equilibrium search dynamics. Econometrica 77(5):1513–1574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D , Qiao L , Sun Y (2018) Dynamic directed random matching. J. Econom. Theory 174:124–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fradkin A (2018) Search, matching, and the role of digital marketplace design in enabling trade: Evidence from airbnb. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Gale D , Shapley LL (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69:9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grassmann W (1977) Transient solutions in markovian queues: An algorithm for finding them and determining their waiting-time distributions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1(6):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurvich I , Ward A (2014) On the dynamic control of matching queues. Stochastic Systems 4(2):479–523.Link, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H , Jan Piskorski M , Yıldırım P (2017) Competing by restricting choice: The case of search platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Herreiner DK (1999) The Decision to Seek or to Be Sought (Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany). Google Scholar
• Hopenhayn HA (1992) Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica 60(5):1127–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2019) Buyer uncertainty about seller capacity: Causes, consequences, and a partial solution. Management Sci. 65(8):3518–3540.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M , Zhou Y (2018) Dynamic type matching. Working paper 2592622, Rotman School of Management, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
• Iyer K , Johari R , Sundararajan M (2014) Mean field equilibria of dynamic auctions with learning. Management Sci. 60(12):2949–2970.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E , Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S , Niederle M (2015) Propose with a rose? signaling in Internet dating markets. Experiment. Econom. 18(4):731–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin J , Milgrom P (2010) Online advertising: Heterogeneity and conflation in market design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(2):603–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lingenbrink D , Iyer K (2017) Optimal signaling mechanisms in unobservable queues with strategic customers. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput., 347–347.Google Scholar
• Lingenbrink D , Iyer K (2018) Signaling in online retail: Efficacy of public signals. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Economics of Networks, Systems and Computation (NetEcon '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 1-1.Google Scholar
• Moen ER (1997) Competitive search equilibrium. J. Political Econom. 105(2):385–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen DT (1982a) The matching process as a noncooperative bargaining game. The Economics of Information and Uncertainty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 233–258.Google Scholar
• Mortensen DT (1982b) Property rights and efficiency in mating, racing, and related games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(5):968–979.Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky M , Schwarz M (2010) Information disclosure and unraveling in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2(2):34–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y , Bimpikis K , Savva N (2018) Crowdsourcing exploration. Management Sci. 64(4):919–939.Link, Google Scholar
• Pissarides CA (1984) Search intensity, job advertising, and efficiency. J. Labor Econom. 2(1):128–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pissarides CA (1985) Short-run equilibrium dynamics of unemployment, vacancies, and real wages. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(4):676–690.Google Scholar
• Rayo L , Segal I (2010) Optimal information disclosure. J. Political Econom. 118(5):949–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson R , Shimer R , Wright R (2005) Search-theoretic models of the labor market: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 43(4):959–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rohlfs J (1974) A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 5(1):16–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romanyuk G , Smolin A (2019) Cream skimming and information design in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 11(2):250–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1982) The economics of matching: stability and incentives. Math. Oper. Res. 7:617–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Shi S , Delacroix A (2018) Should buyers or sellers organize trade in a frictional market? Quart. J. Econom. 133(4):2171–2214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun Y (2006) The exact law of large numbers via fubini extension and characterization of insurable risks. J. Econom. Theory 126(1):31–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyson G , Perta VC , Haddadi H , Seto MC (2016) A first look at user activity on tinder. Proc. 2016 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Adv. Social Networks Anal. Mining (IEEE Press, New York), 461–466.Google Scholar