The Pledging Puzzle: How Can Revocable Promises Increase Charitable Giving?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3811

References

  • Adena M , Huck S (2020) Online fundraising, self-image, and the long-term impact of ask avoidance. Management Sci. 66(2):722–743.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Algoe S (2012) Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 6(6):455–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Algoe S , Kurtz L , Hilaire NM (2016) Putting the “you” in “thank you”: Examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 7(7):658–666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97(December):1447–1458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. (London) 100(June):464–477.Google Scholar
  • Andreoni J , Bernheim DB (2009) Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J , Petrie R (2004) Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. J. Public Econom. 88(7–8):1605–1623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J , Rao JM (2011) The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. J. Public Econom. 95(7):513–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J , Serra-Garcia M (2016) Time-inconsistent charitable giving. Working Paper No. 22824, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Andreoni J , Koessler A , Serra-Garcia M (2018) Who gives? On empathy and impulsiveness. Scharf K , Tonin M , eds. The Economics of Philanthropy: Donations and Fundraising (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 49–62.Google Scholar
  • Andreoni J , Rao JM , Trachtman H (2017) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. J. Political Econom. 125(3):625–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D , Bracha A , Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barratt ES (1959) Anxiety and impulsiveness related to psychomotor efficiency. Perceptual Motor Skills 9(3):191–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS (1974) A theory of social interactions. J. Political Econom. 82(6):1063–1093.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R , Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryan CJ , Adams GS , Monin B (2013) When cheating would make you a cheater: Implicating the self prevents unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Psych. General 142(4):1001–1005.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G , Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74(6):1579–1601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G , Dufwenberg M (2010) Bare promises: An experiment. Econom. Lett. 107(2):281–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dana J , Cain DM , Dawes RM (2006) What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100(2):193–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dana J , Weber R , Kuang JX (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis MH (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 44(1):113–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Oliveira A , Croson R , Eckel C (2011) The giving type: Identifying donors. J. Public Econom. 95(5–6):428–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S , List JA , Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dwyer PC (2015) Gratitude as persuasion: Understanding when and why gratitude expressions facilitate and inhibit compliance. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  • Ellingsen , Johannesson (2004) Promises, threats and fairness. Econom. J. 114(495):397–420.Google Scholar
  • Exley CL (2015) Excusing selfishness in charitable giving: The role of risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):587–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Exley C (2018) Incentives for prosocial behavior: The role of reputations. Management Sci. 64(5):2460–2471.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Exley CL , Naecker J (2017) Observability increases the demand for commitment devices. Management Sci. 63(10):3262–3267.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Exley CL , Petrie R (2018) The impact of a surprise donation ask. J. Public Econom. 158:152–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosgaard T , Soetevent A (2018) Promises undone: How committed pledges impact donations to charity. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper 2018/044-VII, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3173585.Google Scholar
  • Haisley E , Weber R (2010) Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other-regarding behavior. Games Econom. Behav. 68(2):614–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanfling O (2008) How we trust one another. Philosophy 83(2):161–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harbaugh WT (1998) The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):277–282.Google Scholar
  • Kessler J (2017) Announcements of support and public good provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(12):3760–3787.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kessler J , Milkman KL (2016) Identity in charitable giving. Management Sci. 64(2):845–859.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kessler J , Roth A (2014) Don’t take ‘no’ for an answer: An experiment with actual organ donor registrations. NBER Working Paper No. 20378, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Lacetera N , Macis M , Mele A (2016) Viral altruism? Charitable giving and social contagion in online networks. Sociol. Rev. 3:202–238.Google Scholar
  • List JA , Shaikh AM , Xu Y (2019) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom. 22:773–793.Google Scholar
  • Meier S (2007) Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1203–1222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer CJ , Tripodi E (2018) Image concerns in pledges to give blood: Evidence from a field experiment. Preprint, submitted October 10, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3132289.Google Scholar
  • Paulson M (2015) The ‘Pay What You Want’ Experiment at Synagogues. New York Times (February 2), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/02/us/the-pay-what-you-want-experiment-at-synagogues.html.Google Scholar
  • Samek A , Longfield C (2019) Do thank-you calls increase charitable giving? Expert forecasts and field experimental evidence. Preprint, submitted May 13, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3371327.Google Scholar
  • Serra-Garcia M , van Damme E , Potters J (2013) Lying about what you know or about what you do. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(5):1204–1229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small DA , Loewenstein G (2003) Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. J. Risk Uncertainty 26(1):5–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vanberg (2008) Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76(6):1467–1480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton GM , Banaji MR (2004) Being what you say: The effect of essentialist linguistic labels on preferences. Soc. Cognition 22(2):193–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.