Why Join a Team?

References

• Ahn TK, Mark Isaac R, Salmon TC (2008) Endogenous group formation. J. Public Econom. Theory 10(2):171–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
• Babcock P, Bedard K, Charness G, Hartman J, Royer H (2015) Letting down the team? Social effects of team incentives. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(5):841–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bäker A, Mertins V (2013) Risk-sorting and preference for team piece rates. J. Econom. Psychol. 34:285–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2013) Team incentives: Evidence from a firm level experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(5):1079–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh JA, Schul Y (1980) On the cognitive benefits of teaching. J. Ed. Psychol. 72(5):593–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calsamiglia C, Franke J, Rey-Biel P (2013) The incentive effects of affirmative action in a real-effort tournament. J. Public Econom. 98:15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Kuhn P (2011) Laboratory labor: what can labor economists learn from the laboratory? Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, volume 4A (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 229–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Sutter M (2012) Groups make better self-interested decisions. J. Econom. Perspect. 26(3):157–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Yang C-L (2014) Starting small toward voluntary formation of efficient large groups in public goods provision. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 102:119–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A (2011) Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Experiment. Econom. 14(1):47–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lim N (2013) Should managers use team-based contests? Management Sci. 59(12):2823–2836.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen R (2017) Coordination with endogenous groups. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 141:177–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen R, Gong J (2018) Can self selection create high-performing teams? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 148:20–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Saral KJ (2013) Entrepreneurship and team participation: An experimental study. Eur. Econom. Rev. 59:126–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czibor E, Rosendahl Huber L, Koudstaal M (2017) Are entrepreneurs lone wolves? An experimental analysis of sorting into teams. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Denine DJ, Clayton LD, Philips JJ, Dunford BB, Melner SB (1999) Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Res. 30(6):678–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dostie B (2015) Who benefits from firm-sponsored training? IZA World Labor, ePub ahead of print July 1, https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.145.v2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drago R, Garvey GT (1998) Incentives for helping on the job: Theory and evidence. J. Labor Econ. 16(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Google Scholar
• Hamilton B, Nickerson J, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Parker SC, van Praag M (2014) Ability dispersion and team performance. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 14-053/VII, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K (1999) The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of U.S. and Japanese plants. Management Sci. 45(5):704–721.Link, Google Scholar
• Itoh H (1991) Incentives to help in multi-agent situations. Econometrica 59(3):611–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyzlinková R, Dokulilová L, Kroupa A (2007) Teamwork and high performance work organization. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved April 27, 2020, https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/article/2007/teamwork-and-high-performance-work-organisation.Google Scholar
• Kimbrough EO, McGee AD, Shigeoka H (2020) How do peers impact learning? An experimental investigation of peer-to-peer teaching and ability tracking. J. Human Resources. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Kocher M, Strauß S, Sutter M (2006) Individual or team decision-making: causes and consequences of self-selection. Games Econom. Behav. 56(2):259–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh AWL, Lee SC, Stephen WHL (2018) The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis. Appl. Cognitive Psychol. 32(3):401–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, von Siemens F (2009) Worker self-selection and the profits from cooperation. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2-3):573–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Villeval MC (2015) Are women more attracted by cooperative work environments? Econom. J. 125(582):115–140.Google Scholar
• Lazear E (1999) Globalisation and the market for team-mates. Econom. J. 109(454):15–40.Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL (2007) Personnel economics: The economist’s view of human resources. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(4):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler III EE, Mohrman SA, Benson G (2001) Organizing for High Performance: Employee Involvement, TQM, Reengineering, and Knowledge Management in the Fortune 1000. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Lawler EE III, Mohrman SA (2003) Pay practices in Fortune 1000 corporations. Working paper, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Leelawong K, Biswas G (2008) Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty’s brain system. Internat. J. Artificial Inteligence Ed. 18(3):181–208.Google Scholar
• Lim N, Chen H (2014) When do group incentives for salespeople work? J. Mark. Res. 51(3):320–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List J, Rasul I (2011) Field experiments in labor economics. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, volume 4A (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 104–228.Google Scholar
• Meidinger C, Rullière J-L, Villeval MC (2003) Does team-based compensation give rise to problems when agents vary in their ability? Experiment. Econom. 6(3):253–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muis KR, Psaradellis C, Chevrier M, Di Leo I, Lajoie SP (2016) Learning by preparing to teach: Fostering self-regulatory processes and achievement during complex mathematics problem solving. J. Educ. Psychol. 108(4):474–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nestojko JF, Bui DC, Kornell N, Bjork EL (2014) Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages. Memory Cognition 42:1038–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oosterhof A, Van der Vegt GS, Van de Vliert E, Sanders K (2009) Valuing skill differences: Perceived skill complementarity and dyadic helping behavior in teams. Group Organ. Management 34(5):536–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owan H (2014) How should teams be formed and managed? IZA World Labor, ePub ahead of print August 14, https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villeval MC (2020) Public goods, norms and cooperation. Forthcoming in Capra CM, Croson R, Rigdon M, Rosenblat T, eds. Handbook of Experimental Game Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 184–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2014) The menstrual cycle and performance feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):161–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar