The Value of Personalized Pricing
Published Online:5 Apr 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3821
References
- . (2008) Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice. Marketing Lett. 19(3–4):305.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Personalized dynamic pricing of limited inventories. Oper. Res. 57(6):1523–1531.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Optimal and efficient parametric auctions. Proc. 24th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 596–604.Google Scholar
- (2021) Personalized dynamic pricing with machine learning. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (1963) Properties of probability distributions with monotone hazard rate. Ann. Math. Statist. 34(2):375–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Hidden conic quadratic representation of some nonconvex quadratic optimization problems. Math. Programming 143(1–2):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math. Programming 88(3):411–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Deriving robust counterparts of nonlinear uncertain inequalities. Math. Programming 149(1–2):265–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Robust monopoly pricing. J. Econom. Theory 146(6):2527–2543.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The limits of price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(3):921–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Dynamic assortment customization with limited inventories. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):538–553.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Optimal inequalities in probability theory: A convex optimization approach. SIAM J. Optim. 15(3):780–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Reformulation vs. cutting-planes for robust optimization. Comput. Management Sci. 13(2):195–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Intertemporal price discrimination: Structure and computation of optimal policies. Management Sci. 61(1):92–110.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) On the (surprising) sufficiency of linear models for dynamic pricing with demand learning. Management Sci. 61(4):723–739.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Testing the validity of a demand model: An operations perspective. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(1):162–183.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Clearance pricing optimization for a fast-fashion retailer. Oper. Res. 60(6):1404–1422.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Buy-it-now or take-a-chance: Price discrimination through randomized auctions. Management Sci. 60(12):2927–2948.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Bounds on the Lambert function and their application to the outage analysis of user cooperation. IEEE Comm. Lett. 17(8):1505–1508.Google Scholar
- (2017) Distribution-free pricing. Preprint, submitted December 20, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3090002.Google Scholar
- (2015) A statistical learning approach to personalization in revenue management. Preprint, submitted March 18, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2579462.Google Scholar
- (2005) Research note-price discrimination after the purchase: Rebates as state-dependent discounts. Management Sci. 51(7):1131–1140.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Management Sci. 51(7):1120–1130.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Shopper alert: Price may drop for you alone. New York Times (August 9), www.nytimes.com/2012/08/10/business/supermarkets-try-customizing-prices-for-shoppers.html.Google Scholar
- (2020a) Feature based dynamic pricing. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3485.Google Scholar
- (2020b) A simple rule for Pricing with limited demand. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print June 29, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3602.Google Scholar
- (2017) The impact of linear optimization on promotion planning. Oper. Res. 65(2):446–468.Link, Google Scholar
- (1993) On the Lambert W function. Adv. Comput. Math. 5:329–359.Google Scholar
- (2016) Welfare-increasing third-degree price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 47(2):326–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Neiman Marcus focuses on exclusives, personalized offers; ends merger talks. USA Today (June 13), https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2017/06/13/neiman-marcus-focuses-exclusives-personalized-offers/102814962/.Google Scholar
- (2021) The power of opaque products in pricing. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print January 20, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3750.Google Scholar
- (2008) Optimal marketing strategies over social networks. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 189–198.Google Scholar
- (2019) The value of price discrimination in large random networks. Preprint, submitted May 7, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=3368458.Google Scholar
- (2016) Dynamic pricing in high-dimensions. Preprint, submitted October 20, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2855843.Google Scholar
- (2010) Revenue management with strategic customers: Last-minute selling and opaque selling. Management Sci. 56(3):430–448.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) The benefits of personalized pricing in a channel. Marketing Sci. 25(1):97–105.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Revenue optimization with approximate bid predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 1856–1864.Google Scholar
- (1984) Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci. 3(4):288–307.Link, Google Scholar
- (1984) A price discrimination theory of coupons. Marketing Sci. 3(2):128–147.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Markdown or everyday low price? The role of behavioral motives. Management Sci. 62(2):326–346.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Optimizing prices for consumer credit. J. Revenue Pricing Management 12(4):360–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) A semidefinite programming approach to optimal-moment bounds for convex classes of distributions. Math. Oper. Res. 30(3):632–657.Google Scholar
- (2016) Dynamic pricing with demand covariates. Preprint, submitted April 18, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2765257.Google Scholar
- (1934) The economics of imperfect competition. J. Political Econom. 42(2):249–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(1):242–247.Google Scholar
- (2001) On duality theory of conic linear problems. Goberna MÁ, López MA eds. Semi-Infinite Programming (Springer, Boston), 135–165.Google Scholar
- (1988) A general analysis of the output effect under third-degree price discrimination. Econom. J. 98(389):149–158.Google Scholar
- (2007) Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior. Management Sci. 53(5):726–741.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) A lower bound on seller revenue in single buyer monopoly auctions. Oper. Res. Lett. 41(5):474–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Flight prices to get personal? Airfares could vary depending on who is traveling. Time (March 5), http://business.time.com/2013/03/05/flight-prices-to-get-personal-airfares-could-vary-depending-on-who-is-traveling/.Google Scholar
- U.S. Council of Economic Advisers (2016) Big data and differential pricing. Report, Executive Office of the President of the United States, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2000) Nonparametric density estimation. Asymptotic Statistics , vol. 3 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 341–356.Google Scholar
- (1985) Price discrimination and social welfare. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(4):870–875.Google Scholar
- (2016) Price discrimination in a market with uninformed consumer preferences. Preprint, submitted May 11, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2777081.Google Scholar
- (2011) The perils of behavior-based personalization. Marketing Sci. 30(1):170–186.Link, Google Scholar

