The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Networks
Published Online:18 Feb 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3824
References
- (2018) The costs of sovereign default: Evidence from the stock market. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(5):1707–1751.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade flows. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(3):412–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The best of both worlds: Accessing emerging economies via developed markets. J. Finance 74(5):2579–2617.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 58(5):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Production smoothing and the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(2):208–220.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Ration gaming and the bullwhip effect. Oper. Res. 67(2):453–467.Abstract, Google Scholar
- Bureau of Economic Analysis (2018a) NIPA Table 1.1.9 Implicit Price Deflators for Gross Domestic Product: Quarterly. Accessed June 10, 2018, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?eid=13116&rid=53.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Economic Analysis (2018b) NIPA Table 2BUI Implicit Price Deflators for Manufacturing and Trade Sales. Accessed June 9, 2018 https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&step=2&isuri=1&1921=underlying#.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Economic Analysis (2019) Use tables, after redefinitions, margin details. Accessed January 4, 2019, https://apps.bea.gov/industry/xls/underlying-estimates/Margins_After_Redefinitions_2007_2012_DET.xlsx.Google Scholar
- (2007) In search of the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):457–479.Link, Google Scholar
- CGS (2010) Inside the CGS Identification System (CUSIP Global Services, New York).Google Scholar
- (2012) Bullwhip effect measurement and its implications. Oper. Res. 60(4):771–784.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Supply chain management with online customer selection. Oper. Res. 64(2):458–473.Link, Google Scholar
- (1979) Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Management Sci. 25(5):498–501.Link, Google Scholar
- (1961) Industrial Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2000) Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management 5(2):78–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) A model for make-to-order revenue management. Working paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2017) Production networks and stock returns: The role of creative destruction. Rev. Financial Stud., Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2005) Managing Customers as Investments: The Strategic Value of Customers in the Long Run (FT Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2006) Suppliers’ willingness to end unprofitable customer relationships: An exploratory investigation in the German mechanical engineering sector. Eur. J. Marketing 40(3/4):366–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Toyota Supply Chain Management: A Strategic Approach to Toyota’s Renowned System (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) The right way to manage unprofitable customers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(4):94–102.Google Scholar
- (1963) Introduction to the Theory of Statistics , 2nd ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- (2015) Systematic risk in supply chain networks. Management Sci. 62(6):1755–1777.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Innovation as a determinant of suppliers’ roles and performances: An empirical study in the food machinery industry. Eur. J. Purchasing Supply Management 8(3):135–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) A multiclass queue in heavy traffic with throughput time constraints: Asymptotically optimal dynamic controls. Queueing Systems 39(1):23–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Jumped, pushed or forgotten? Approaches to dissolution. J. Marketing Management 19(1-2):131–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) What can be learned from classical inventory models: A cross-industry empirical investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):409–429.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) An empirical study of the bullwhip effect in China. Production Oper. Management 23(4):537–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) When to “fire” customers: Customer cost-based pricing. Management Sci. 58(5):932–947.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 212(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Sprint drops clients over excessive inquiries. Wall Street J. (July 7), A3.Google Scholar
- (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Balancing risk and return in a customer portfolio. J. Marketing 75(3):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The Discipline of Market Leaders: Choose Your Customers, Narrow Your Focus, Dominate Your Market (Basic Books, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
- (2016) The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(3):691–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) When ignorance is not bliss: An empirical analysis of sub-tier supply network structure on firm risk. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bull. 1(6):80–83.Crossref, Google Scholar

