Revisiting Ellsberg’s and Machina’s Paradoxes: A Two-Stage Evaluation Model Under Ambiguity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3835

References

  • Aerts D, Geriente S, Moreira C, Sozzo S (2018) Testing ambiguity and machina preferences within a quantum-theoretic framework for decision-making. J. Math. Econom. 78:176–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 34(1):199–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baillon A, L’Haridon O, Placido L (2011) Ambiguity models and the machina paradoxes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1547–1560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M, Sarin RK (2019) The myopic property in decision models. Decision Anal. 16(2):128–141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Weber M (1992) Recent development in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:325–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cappelli V, Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Minardi S (2020) Sources of uncertainty and subjective prices. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc., ePub ahead of print June 9, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaa013.Google Scholar
  • Chew SH, Li KK, Chark R, Zhong S (2008) Source preference and ambiguity aversion: models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments. Adv. Health Econom. Health Services Res. 20:197–201.Google Scholar
  • de Finetti B (1937) La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annals de l’Institute Henri Poincare. Kyburg HE, Smokler HE, eds. Studies in Subjective Probabilities, vol. 7 (John Wiley and Sons, New York), 1–68.Google Scholar
  • Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Statist. 38(2):325–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbs IM (1991) A Bayesian approach to decision-making under ambiguity. Economica 58(232):417–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dominiak A, Lefort J-P (2020) Ambiguity and probabilistic information. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print November 5, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3705.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox CR, Tversky A (1995) Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quart. J. Econom. 110(3):585–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghirardato P (2002) Revisiting savage in a conditional world. Econom. Theory 20(1):83–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2004) Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory 118(2):133–173.Google Scholar
  • Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant S, Polak B, Strzalecki T (2009), Second-order expected utility. Working paper 8340, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2014) Expected uncertain utility theory. Econometrica 82(1):1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He Y (2020) A note on recursive two-stage evaluation model. Working paper, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Demark.Google Scholar
  • Jaffray J-Y (1989) Linear utility theory for belief functions. Oper. Res. Lett. 8(2):107–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffray J-Y, Wakker P (1993) Decision making with belief functions: Compatibility and incompatibility with the sure-thing principle. J. Risk Uncertainty 7(3):255–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kopylov I (2007) Subjective probabilities on “small” domains. J. Econom. Theory 133(1):236–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • L’Haridon O, Placido L (2010) Betting on Machina’s reflection example: An experiment on ambiguity. Theory Decision 69:375–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A (2006) Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74(6):1447–1498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machina MJ (2009) Risk, ambiguity, and the rank-dependence axioms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):385–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machina MJ (2014) Ambiguity aversion with three or more outcomes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3814–3840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machina MJ, Schmeidler D (1992) A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60(4):745–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machina MJ, Siniscalchi M (2014) Ambiguity and ambiguity aversion. Machina M, Viscusi K, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 1 (Elsevier, New York), 729–807.Google Scholar
  • Marinacci M (2015) Model uncertainty. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(6):1022–1100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nau RF (2006) Uncertainty aversion with second-order utilities and probabilities. Management Sci. 52(1):136–145.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Neilson WS (2010) A simplified axiomatic approach to ambiguity aversion. J. Risk Uncertainty 41(2):113–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramsey F (1964) Truth and Probability 1926 (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
  • Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3):571–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal U (1987) The Ellsberg paradox and risk aversion: An anticipated utility approach. Internat. Econom. Rev. 28(1):175–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seo K (2009) Ambiguity and second-order belief. Econometrica 77(5):1575–1605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shafer G (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (Princetion University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siniscalchi M (2009) Vector expected utility and attitudes toward variation. Econometrica 77(3):801–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Wakker PP (2011) Jaffray’s ideas on ambiguity. Theory Decision 71(1):11–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.