Social Learning and Solar Photovoltaic Adoption

References

• Anderson SJ, Chandy R, Zia B (2018) Pathways to profits: The impact of marketing vs. finance skills on business performance. Management Sci. 64(12):5559–5583.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson SJ, Chintagunta P, Vilcassim N (2020) Stimulating marketing strategy innovation with entrepreneurs in Uganda: Examining the impact of skype-aided business coaching on firm sales. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Jack BK (2014) No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery. J. Public Econom. 120:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayer P, Pintoff R, Pozen D (2009) Building criminal capital behind bars: Peer effect in juvenile corrections. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):105–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-David I, Graham JR, Harvey CR (2013) Managerial miscalibration. Quart. J. Econom. 128(4):1547–1584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BenYishay A, Mobarak AM (2017) Social learning and incentives for experimentation and communication. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(3):976–1009Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J (2014) Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J. Consumer Psychol. 24(4):586–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust difference-in-differences estimates. Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J (2013) Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Burkhardt J, Gillingham K (2020) Peer effects in water conservation: Evidence from consumer migration. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 12(3):107–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Gillingham K (2012) Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Marketing Sci. 31(6):900–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Gillingham K (2019) Learning-by-doing in solar photovoltaic installations. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Bowles S, Polania-Reyes S (2012) Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements? J. Econom. Literature 50(2):368–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandon A, List J, Metcalfe R, Price M, Rundhammer F (2018) Testing for crowd out in social nudges: Evidence from a natural field experiment in the market for electricity. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 116(12):5293–5298.Google Scholar
• Cameron C, Gelbach J, Miller D (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carattini S, Péclat M, Baranzini A (2018) Social interactions and the adoption of solar pv: Evidence from cultural borders. Working paper, London School of Economics, London. Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang T (2014) Interpersonal bundling. Management Sci. 61(6):1456–1471.Link, Google Scholar
• Coffman L, Featherstone C, Kessler J (2014) Can social information affect what job you choose and keep? Working paper, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Dupas P (2010) Free distribution or cost-sharing? Evidence from a randomized malaria prevention experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 125(1):1–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conley T, Udry C (2010) Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):35–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CT SOTS (2015) Registration and enrollment statistics data. Accessed June 1, 2015, http://www.sots.ct.gov/sots.Google Scholar
• Daniel KD, Litterman RB, Wagner G (2019) Declining co2 price paths. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 116(42):20886–20891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List J, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Luo X, Fang Z (2016) Self-signaling and prosocial behavior: a cause marketing experiment. Marketing Sci. 36(2):161–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Saez E (2003) The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):815–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberg A, Gardete PM, Macera R, Noton C (2019) Dynamic effects of price promotions: A large-scale field experiment. Quantitative Marketing Econom. 17(1):1–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (2016) Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under executive order 12866. Technical report, Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Ferraro P, Price M (2013) Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(1):64–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro P, Miranda JJ, Price M (2011) The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: Evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):318–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher AR (1935) The Design of Experiments (Oliver and Boyd, London).Google Scholar
• Foster A, Rosenzweig M (1995) Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. J. Political Econom. 103(6):1176–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey B, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman B, Ardani K, Feldman D, Citron R, Margolis R, Zuboy J (2013) Benchmarking non-hardware balance-of-system (soft) costs for U.S. photovoltaic systems using a bottom-up approach and installer survey-second edition. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
• Geostellar (2013) The addressable solar market in connecticut. Report for CEFIA, Geostellar and Martinsberg, West Virginia.Google Scholar
• Gillingham K, Palmer K (2014) Bridging the energy efficiency gap: Policy insights from economic theory and empirical analysis. Rev. Environ. Econom. Policy 8(1):18–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillingham K, Tsvetanov T (2016) Hurdles and steps: Estimating demand for solar photovoltaics. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Giné X, Yang D (2009) Insurance, credit, and technology adoption: Field experimental evidence from Malawi. J. Developed Econom. 89(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Sacerdote B, Scheinkman J (1996) Crime and social interaction. Quart. J. Econom. 111(2):507–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Laibson D, Scheinkman J, Soutter C (2000) Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):811–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspective 25(4):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grayson K, Johnson D, Chen DFR (2008) Is firm trust essential in a trusted environment? How trust in the business context influences customers. J. Marketing Res. 45(2):241–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graziano M, Gillingham K (2015) Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: The influence of neighbors and the built environment. J. Econom. Geography 15(4):815–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harding M, Hsiaw A (2014) Goal setting and energy conservation. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Hausman N, Condee N (2014) Planning and Implementing a Solarize Initiative: A Guide for State Program Managers. Clean Energy States Alliance Guidebook, Clean Energy States Alliance, Montpelier, VT.Google Scholar
• Jacobsen G, Kotchen M, Clendenning G (2013) Community-based incentives for environmental protection: The case of green electricity. J. Regulatory Econom. 44:30–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jing X, Xie J (2011) Group buying: A new mechanism for selling through social interactions. Management Sci. 57(8):1354–1372.Link, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List J (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman RJ, Wang B (2001) New buyers’ arrival under dynamic pricing market microstructure: The case of group-buying discounts on the Internet. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(2):157–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman RJ, Lai H, Ho CT (2010) Incentive mechanisms, fairness and participation in online group-buying auctions. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 9:249–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler J (2014) Announcements of support and public good provision. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Kraft-Todd GT, Bollinger B, Gillingham K, Lamp S, Rand DG (2018) Credibility-enhancing displays promote the provision of a non-normative public good. Nature 563(7730):245.Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Miguel E, Mullainathan S, Null C, Zwane AP (2011) Social engineering: Evidence from a suite of take-up experiments in Kenya. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• LaRiviere J, Price M, Holladay S, Novgorodsky D (2014) Prices vs. nudges: A large field experiment on energy efficiency fixed cost investments. Working paper, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.Google Scholar
• List J, Price M (2009) The role of social connections in charitable fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 69:160–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr D (2013) Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing (New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC).Google Scholar
• Mian A, Sufi A (2012) The effects of fiscal stimulus: Evidence from the 2009 cash for clunkers program. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1107–1142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miguel E, Kremer M (2004) Worms: Identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica 72(1):159–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Nair H (2013) Estimating causal installed-base effects: A bias-correction approach. J. Marketing Res. 50(1):70–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rode J, Weber A (2016) Does localized imitation drive technology adoption? A case study on rooftop photovoltaic systems in Germany. J. Environ. Econom. Management 78:38–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2002) Covariance adjustment in randomized experiments and observational studies. Statist. Sci. 17(3):286–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sianesi B (2004) An evaluation of the swedish system of active labor market programs in the 1990s. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(1):133–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen A (2006) Social learning and health plan choice. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):929–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R, Sunstein C (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
• Towe C, Lawley C (2013) The contagion effect of neighboring foreclosures. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 5(2):313–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2008) Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. 55(12):2024–2039.Link, Google Scholar
• Vasilaky K, Leonard K (2011) As good as the networks they keep? improving farmers’ social networks via randomized information exchange in rural Uganda. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2015) Estimation of beauty contest auctions. Marketing Sci. 35(1):27–54.Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Feick L, Mittal V (2013) How males and females differ in their likelihood of transmitting negative word of mouth. J. Consumer Res. 40(6):1097–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar