The Effect of Peer Gender on Major Choice in Business School

References

• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2002) Identity and schooling: Some lessons for the economics of education. J. Econom. Lit. 40(4):1167–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anelli M, Peri G (2019) The effects of high school peers’ gender on college major, college performance and income. Econom. J. (Lond.). 129(618):553–602.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):228–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booth AL, Cardona-Sosa L, Nolen P (2013) Do single-sex classes affect exam scores? An Experiment in a Coeducational University. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7207, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
• Brenøe AA, Zölitz U (2020) Exposure to more female peers widens the gender gap in STEM participation. J. Labor Econom. 38(4):1009–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Fujiwara T, Pallais A (2017) “Acting wife”: Marriage market incentives and labor market investments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(11):3288–3319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnevale AP, Strohl J, Melton M (2014) What’s it worth? The economic value of college majors. CEW Georgetown Report, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Sacerdote BI, West JE (2013) From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica 81(3):855–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld J, Zölitz U (2017) Understanding peer effects–On the nature, estimation and channels of peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):387–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Figlio DN (2007) Boys named Sue: disruptive children and their peers. Education 2(4):376–394.Google Scholar
• Fischer S (2017) The downside of good peers: How classroom composition differentially affects men’s and women’s STEM persistence. Labour Econom. 46:211–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelbach JB (2016) When do covariates matter? And which ones, and how much? J. Labor Econom. 34(2):509–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goulas S, Megalokonomou R, Zhang Y (2018) Does the girl next door affect your academic outcomes and career choices? IZA Discussion Paper No. 11910, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
• Guryan J, Kroft K, Notowidigdo M (2009) Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional golf tournaments. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(4):34–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill AJ (2015) The girl next door: The effect of opposite gender friends on high school achievement. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 7(3):147–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill AJ (2017) The positive influence of female college students on their male peers. Labour Econom. 44:151–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoxby C (2000) Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. NBER Working Paper No. 7867, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D (2010) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol. Methods 15(4):309–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavy V, Schlosser A (2011) Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 3(2):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lordan G, Pischke JS (2016) Does Rosie like riveting? Male and female occupational choices. NBER Working Paper No. 22495, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
• OECD (2018) Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators (OECD Publishing, Paris).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oosterbeek H, Van Ewijk R (2014) Gender peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Econom. Educ. Rev. 38:51–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S (2018) Coeducation, academic performance, and subject choice: Evidence from quasi-random classroom assignments. Educ. Econom. 26(6):574–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schøne P, von Simson K, Strøm M (2020) Peer gender and educational choices. Empir. Econ. 9(4):1763–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solnick SJ (1995) Changes in women’s majors from entrance to graduation at women’s and coeducational colleges. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 48(3):505–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thiemann P (2018) The persistent effects of short-term peer groups in higher education. Lund University Discussion Paper No. 2018:32, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
• Thompson JS (2003) The effect of single-sex secondary schooling on women’s choice of college major. Sociol. Perspect. 46(2):257–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitmore D (2005) Resource and peer impacts on girls’ academic achievement: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):199–203.Crossref, Google Scholar