Compensating Online Content Producers: A Theoretical Analysis

References

• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005) Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Du J, Shin W (2021) Media platforms' content provision strategy and source of profits. Marketing Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Coate S (2005) Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(4):947–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Miller J (2002) Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 70(2):737–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aslam S (2019) YouTube by the Numbers: Stats, Demographics and Fun Facts. Accessed October 1, 2019, https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/.Google Scholar
• Azar OH (2009) Incentives and service quality in the restaurant industry: The tipping–service puzzle. Appl. Econom. 41(15):1917–1927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu AK, Lal R, Srinivasan V, Staelin R (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Brandts J, Ockenfels A (1998) Measuring motivations for the reciprocal responses observed in a simple dilemma game. Experiment. Econom. 1(3):207–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P, Martínez-Jerez FA (2009) Relative performance compensation, contests, and dynamic incentives. Management Sci. 55(8):1306–1320.Link, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lim N (2013) Should managers use team-based contests? Management Sci. 59(12):2823–2836.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Koenigsberg O, Zhang ZJ (2017) Pay-as-you-wish pricing. Marketing Sci. 36(5):780–791.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui H, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2019) US YouTube Net Video Ad Revenues, 2016–2020. Accessed October 1, 2019, https://www.emarketer.comchart/222581/us-youtube-net-video-ad-revenues-2016-2020-billions-of-youtube-revenues-of-us-video-ad-spending.Google Scholar
• Enders A, Hungenberg H, Denker HP, Mauch S (2008) The long tail of social networking: Revenue models of social networking sites. Eur. Management J. 26(3):199–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2001) Appropriating the commons: A theoretical explanation. Discussion paper 2925, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2006) The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism—experimental evidence and new theories. Kolm S-C, Ythier JM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 615–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guda H, Subramanian U (2019) Your Uber is arriving: Managing on-demand workers through surge pricing, forecast communication, and worker incentives. Management Sci. 65(5):1995–2014.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Guo L (2015) Inequity aversion and fair selling. J. Marketing Res. 52(1):77–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iqbal M (2019) Twitch revenue and usage statistics. Accessed October 1, 2019, https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitch-statistics/.Google Scholar
• Jain S (2012) Self-control and incentives: An analysis of multiperiod quota plans. Marketing Sci. 31(5):855–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalra A, Shi M (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalra A, Shi M, Srinivasan K (2003) Salesforce compensation scheme and consumer inferences. Management Sci. 49(5):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz M, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Khadjavi M (2016) Indirect reciprocity and charitable giving—evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 63(11):3708–3717.Link, Google Scholar
• Kohler S (2011) Altruism and fairness in experimental decisions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 80(1):101–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Liao C (2019) Opinion leaders and product variety. Marketing Sci. 38(5):812–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Srinivasan V (1993) Compensation plans for single-and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom model. Management Sci. 39(7):777–793.Link, Google Scholar
• Levine DK (1998) Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 1(3):593–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li KJ, Jain S (2015) Behavior-based pricing: An analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness. Management Sci. 62(9):2705–2721.Link, Google Scholar
• Lim N (2010) Social loss aversion and optimal contest design. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):777–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N, Chen H (2014) When do group incentives for salespeople work? J. Marketing Res. 51(3):320–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Putler DS, Weinberg CB (2004) Is having more channels really better? A model of competition among commercial television broadcasters. Marketing Sci. 23(1):120–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Mediakix (2018) How much do top Twitch streamers make? Accessed October 1, 2019, http://www.mediakix.com/blog/how-much-do-twitch-streamers-make/.Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Mahajan V, Bronnenberg B (2003) Advertising versus pay-per-view in electronic media. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 20(2003):13–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao RC (1990) Compensating heterogeneous salesforces: Some explicit solutions. Marketing Sci. 9(4):319–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg E (2018) How Youtube Ad Revenue Works. Accessed October 1, 2019, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/032615/how-youtube-ad-revenue-works.asp.Google Scholar
• Ross SA (1973) The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(2):134–139.Google Scholar
• Salop SC (1979) Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt KM, Spann M, Zeithammer R (2015) Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets. Management Sci. 61(6):1217–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Shy O (2014) Do tips increase workers’ income? Management Sci. 61(9):2041–2051.Link, Google Scholar
• Sriram S, Manchanda P, Bravo ME, Chu J, Ma L, Song M, Shriver S, Subramanian U (2015) Platforms: A multiplicity of research opportunities. Marketing Lett. 26(2):141–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun M, Zhu F (2013) Ad revenue and content commercialization: Evidence from blogs. Management Sci. 59(10):2314–2331.Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Twitch (2019) Guide to cheering with bits. Accessed October 1, 2019, https://help.twitch.tv/s/article/guide-to-cheering-with-bits?language=en_US..Google Scholar
• Xiang T (2016) Virtual gifts are still the top earner in china’s live video streaming market. TechNode (May 5), https://technode.com/2016/05/05/virtual-gifts-are-still-the-top-earner-in-chinas-live-video-streaming-market/.Google Scholar
• YouTube (2019) YouTube partner program policy. Accessed, http://www.YouTube.com.Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Sarvary M (2014) Differentiation with user-generated content. Management Sci. 61(4):898–914.Link, Google Scholar