The Interplay Between Online Reviews and Physician Demand: An Empirical Investigation

References

• Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Sci. 57(8):1485–1509.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry S (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):242–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Pakes A (2007) The pure characteristics demand model. Internat. Econom. Rev. 48(4):1193–1225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brody S, Elhadad N (2010a) Detecting salient aspects in online reviews of health providers. AMIA Annual Sympos. Proc., vol. 2010 (American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, MD), 202–206.Google Scholar
• Brody S, Elhadad N (2010b) An unsupervised aspect-sentiment model for online reviews. Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles, California), 804–812.Google Scholar
• Chevalier J, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui R, Gallino S, Moreno A, Zhang DJ (2018) The operational value of social media information. Production Oper. Management 27(10):1749–1769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong J, Yom-Tov E, Yom-Tov GB (2019) The impact of delay announcements on hospital network coordination and waiting times. Management Sci. 65(5):1969–1994.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Esuli A, Sebastiani F (2007) Sentiwordnet: A high-coverage lexical resource for opinion mining. Evaluation (European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Genoa, Italy), 1–26.Google Scholar
• Fellbaum C (1998) Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao G, Greenwood B, Agarwal R, Jeffrey S (2015) Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? MIS Quart. 39(3):565–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghani R, Probst K, Liu Y, Krema M, Fano A (2006) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. SIGKDD Explorations 1(8):41–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2012) Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowd-sourced content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):493–520.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Harris K, Buntin M (2008) Choosing a healthcare provider: The role of quality information. Policy 1. 1(6):1–14.Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1996) Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. The economics of new goods. (University of Chicago Press), 207–248.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Liu B (2004) Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proc. 10th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (KDD04) (ACM, New York), 168–177.Google Scholar
• Hutto CJ, Gilbert E (2014) Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. 8th Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media. (AAAI Publications, Ann Arbor, Michigan).Google Scholar
• Liu N, Finkelstein SR, Kruk ME, Rosenthal D (2018) When waiting to see a doctor is less irritating: Understanding patient preferences and choice behavior in appointment scheduling. Management Sci. 64(5):1975–1996.Link, Google Scholar
• Luca M (2011) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of yelp.com. Working paper, Harvard Business School NOM Unit, Boston.Google Scholar
• Luca M, Vats S (2014) Digitizing Doctor Demand: The Impact of Online Reviews on Doctor Choice. Health & Healthcare in America: From Economics to Policy (Ashecon).Google Scholar
• Manning C, Schutze H (1999) Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1978) Modelling the Choice of Residential Location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, A. Karlgvist (ed.). (Amsterdam, North-Holland). Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
• McLachlan G, Do K, Ambroise C (2005) Analyzing Microarray Gene Expression Data, vol. 422 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• McLaughlin GH (1969) Smog grading: A new readability formula. J. Reading 12(8):639–646.Google Scholar
• Mein Goh J, Gao G, Agarwal R (2016) The creation of social value: Can an online health community reduce rural-urban health disparities. MIS Quart. 40(1):247–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7(4):308–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2001) Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica 69(2):307–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pulia M (2011) Simple tips to improve patient satisfaction. Amer. Acad. Emergency Medicine 18(1):18–19.Google Scholar
• Rastegar-Mojarad M, Ye Z, Wall D, Murali N, Lin S (2015) Collecting and analyzing patient experiences of healthcare from social media. JMIR Res. Protocols 4(3):e78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Razzouk N, Seitz V, Webb J (2004) What’s important in choosing a primary care physician: An analysis of consumer response. Internat. J. Health Care Quality Assurance 17(4):205–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renter E (2015) Why nice doctors are better doctors. US News & World Reports (April 20), https://health.usnews.com/health-news/patient-advice/articles/2015/04/20/why-nice-doctors-are-better-doctors.Google Scholar
• Sargan D, Desai M (1988) Lectures on Advanced Econometric Theory (Blackwell, Portland, Oregon).Google Scholar
• Silverman BD (2012) Physician behavior and bedside manners: The influence of William Osler and the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Proc. Baylor University Medical Center 25(1):58–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song M (2011) A hybrid discrete choice model of differentiated product demand with an application to personal computers. Internat. Econom. Rev. 56(1):265–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steckel J, Vanhonacker W (1993) Cross-validating regression models in marketing research. Marketing Sci. 12(4):415–427.Link, Google Scholar
• Tay A (2003) Assessing competition in hospital care markets: The importance of accounting for quality differentiation. RAND J. Econom. 34(4):786–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varkevisser CM, Van der Geest SA, Schut FT (2012) Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands. J. Health Econom. 31(2):371–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM, Winer RS (1999) Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. 45(10):1324–1338.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang G, Li J, Hopp WJ, Fazzalari FL, Bolling S (2019) Using patient-specific quality information to unlock hidden healthcare capabilities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):582–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Wansbeek J, Meijer E (2000) Measurement Error and Latent Variables in Econometrics, vol. 37 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• White S (2006) Key concepts and features of the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. Report, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Wu C, Che H, Chan T, Lu X (2015) The economic value of online reviews. Marketing Sci. 34(5):739–754.Link, Google Scholar