Reviews and Self-Selection Bias with Operational Implications

References

• Abeliuk A, Berbeglia G, Cebrian M, Van Hentenryck P (2015) The benefits of social influence in optimized cultural markets. PLoS One 10(4):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A (2011) Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dynamic Games Appl. 1(1):3–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Dahleh MA, Lobel I, Ozdaglar A (2011) Bayesian learning in social networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(4):1201–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Makhdoumi A, Malekian A, Ozdaglar A (2018) Fast and slow learning from reviews. Working paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, de Palma A (1992) Multiproduct firms: A nested logit approach. J. Indust. Econom. 40(3):261–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S (1985) Discrete-Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Scarsini M (2018) On information distortions in online ratings. Oper. Res. 66(3):597–610.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Combes R (2013) An introduction to stochastic approximation. Accessed June 28, 2018, https://people.kth.se/∼alepro/DistriOptCourse/lecture_stoch_approx.pdf.Google Scholar
• Crapis D, Ifrach B, Maglaras C, Scarsini M (2016) Monopoly pricing in the presence of social learning. Management Sci. 63(11):3586–3608.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Wood CA (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Sci. 54(3):460–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Zhang XM, Awad NF (2007) Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. J. Interactive Marketing 21(4):23–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMarzo PM, Vayanos D, Zwiebel J (2003) Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):909–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durrett R (2007) Probability: Theory and Examples, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY).Google Scholar
• Engler TH, Winter P, Schulz M (2015) Understanding online product ratings: A customer satisfaction model. J. Retailing Consumer Services 27:113–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D, Pearson M (2015) Bias and reciprocity in online reviews: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC ‘15) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY), 641.Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Wang R (2014) Multiproduct price optimization and competition under the nested logit model with product-differentiated price sensitivities. Oper. Res. 62(2):450–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (W.H. Freeman & Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Garvin DA (1987) Competing on the eight dimensions of quality. Harvard Bus. Rev. 65(6):101–109.Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva JC (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu N, Pavlou PA, Zhang J (2017) On self-selection biases in online product reviews. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(2):449–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juslin P, Winman A, Hansson P (2007) The naive intuitive statistician: A naive sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. Psych. Rev. 114(3):678–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1449–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellett CM (2015) Classical converse theorems in Lyapunov’s second method. Discrete Continuous Dynamical Systems B 20(8):2333–2360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh NS, Hu N, Clemons EK (2010) Do online reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 9(5):374–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kushner H, Yin GG (2003) Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Algorithms and Applications, vol. 35 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Lee YJ, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2010) Price effects in online product reviews: An analytical model and empirical analysis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(4):809–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maldonado F, Hentenryck PV, Berbeglia G, Berbeglia F (2018) Popularity signals in trial-offer markets with social influence and position bias. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 266(2):775–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molavi P, Tahbaz-Salehi A, Jadbabaie A (2018) A theory of non—Bayesian social learning. Econometrica 86:445–490.Google Scholar
• Mossel E, Sly A, Tamuz O (2015) Strategic learning and the topology of social networks. Econometrica 83(5):1755–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Sci. 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y, Savva N (2016) Dynamic pricing in the presence of social learning and strategic consumers. Management Sci. 63(4):919–939.Link, Google Scholar
• Podium (2017) 2017 state of online reviews. Accessed June 28, 2018, http://learn.podium.com/rs/841-BRM-380/images/2017-SOOR-Infographic.jpg.Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Shen ZM, Shmoys DB (2010) Dynamic assortment optimization with a multinomial logit choice model and capacity constraint. Oper. Res. 58(6):1666–1680.Link, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Sci. 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smallwood DE, Conlisk J (1979) Product quality in markets where consumers are imperfectly informed. Quart. J. Econom. 93(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith L, Sørensen P (2000) Pathological outcomes of observational learning. Econometrica 68(2):371–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JE, Winkler RL (2006) The optimizer’s curse: Skepticism and postdecision surprise in decision analysis. Management Sci. 52(3):311–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri K, Van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1988) Anomalies: The winner’s curse. J. Econom. Perspect. 2(1):191–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tong J, Feiler D, Ivantsova A (2018) Good choice, bad judgment: How choice under uncertainty generates overoptimism. Psych. Sci. 29(2):254–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaccari S, Maglaras C, Scarsini M (2018) Social learning from online reviews with product choice. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Ying Y, Feinberg F, Wedel M (2006) Leveraging missing ratings to improve online recommendation systems. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):355–365.Crossref, Google Scholar