Do People Understand the Benefit of Diversification?

References

• Almenberg J, Dreber A (2015) Gender, stock market participation, and financial literacy. Econom. Lett. 137:140–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• André Q, Reinholtz N, De Langhe B (2017) Variance spillover in intuitive statistical judgments. Gneezy A, Griskevicius V, Williams P, eds. NA Advances in Consumer Research (Association for Consumer Research, Deluth, MN)., 45:336–340.Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2000) Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. J. Finance 55(2):773–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Statist. Software 67(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S (2001) Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock. J. Finance 56(5):1747–1764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (2001) Naïve diversification strategies in defined contribution savings plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):79–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blume ME, Friend I (1975) The asset structure of individual portfolios and some implications for utility functions. J. Finance 30(2):585–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennan MJ (1975) The optimal number of securities in a risky asset portfolio when there are fixed costs of transacting: Theory and some empirical results. J. Financial Quantitative Anal. 10(3):483–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickner J, Dettling LJ, Henriques A, Hsu JW, Jacobs L, Moore KB, Pack S, et al. (2017) Changes in U.S. family finances from 2013 to 2016: Evidence from the survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bull. 103(3):1–41.Google Scholar
• Campbell JY (2000) Diversification: A Bigger Free Lunch. (Winter). Canadian Investment Review 13(4):14–15.Google Scholar
• Campbell JY (2006) Household finance. J. Finance 61(4):1553–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JY, Ramadorai T, Ranish B (2018) Do the rich get richer in the stock market? Evidence from India. NBER Working Paper No. 24898, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA..Google Scholar
• Chakravarty S, Harrison GW, Haruvy EE, Rutström EE (2011) Are you risk averse over other people’s money? Southern Econom. J. 77(4):901–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christelis D, Jappelli T, Padula M (2010) Cognitive ability and portfolio choice. Eur. Econom. Rev. 54:18–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
• Cooper I, Kaplanis E (1994) Home bias in equity portfolios, inflation hedging, and international capital market equilibrium. Rev. Financial Stud. 7(1):44–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornil Y, Hardisty D, Bart Y (2019) Easy, breezy, risky: Lay investors fail to diversify because correlated assets feel more fluent and less risky. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 153:103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Langhe B, van Osselear SMJ, Puntoni S, McGill AL (2014) Fooled by heteroskedastic randomness: Local consistency breeds extremity in price-based quality inferences. J. Consumer Res. 41:978–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delavande A, Rohwedder S (2008) Eliciting subjective probabilities in Internet surveys. Public Opinion Quart. 72(5):866–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksen KW, Kvaløy O (2010) Myopic investment management. Rev. Finance 14(3):521–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandes D, Lynch JG Jr, Netemeyer RG (2014) Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream behavior. Management Sci. 60(8):1861–1883.Link, Google Scholar
• Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behav. Decision Making 13:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganzach Y (2000) Judging risk and return of financial assets. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(2):353–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaure S (2018) Linear group fixed effects. R package version 2.6-2291.Google Scholar
• Goetzmann WM, Kumar A (2008) Equity portfolio diversification. Rev. Finance 12(3):433–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, Rothschild D (2014) Lay understanding of probability distributions. Judgment Decision Making 9(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, Taleb NN (2007) We don’t quite know what we are talking about when we talk about volatility. J. Portfolio Management 33(4):84–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, Johnson EJ, Sharpe WF (2008) Choosing outcomes vs. choosing products: Consumer-focused retirement investment advice. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):440–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman JK, Paolacci G (2017) Crowdsourcing consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 44:196–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Jappelli T (2009) Financial literacy and portfolio diversification. Working paper 212.Google Scholar
• Hauser DJ, Paolacci G, Chandler J (2019) Common concerns with MTurk as a participant pool: Evidence and solutions. Kardes FR, Herr PM, Schwarz N, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Consumer Psychology (Routledge, London), 319–337.Google Scholar
• Holzmeister F, Huber J, Kirchler M, Lindner F, Weitzel U, Zeisberger S (2020) What drives risk perception? A global survey with financial professionals and lay people. Management Sci. 66(9):3977–4002.Link, Google Scholar
• Huberman G (2001) Familiarity breeds investment. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(3):659–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughson E, Stutzer M, Yung C (2006) The misuse of expected returns. Financial Anal. J. 62(6):88–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson PO, Fay LC (1950) The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika 15(4):349–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly M (1995) All their eggs in one basket: Portfolio diversification of U.S. households. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 27:87–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klapper LF, Lusardi A, Panos GA (2012) Financial literacy and the financial crisis. Working paper 17930, NBER, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Long AR, Fernbach PM, de Langhe B (2018) Circle of incompetence: Sense of understanding as an improper guide to investment risk. J. Marketing Res. 55(4):474–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes LL, Oden GC (1999) The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and SP/A. J. Math. Psych. 43(2):286–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusardi A, Mitchell OS (2007) Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: Evidence and implications for financial education. Bus. Econom. 42(1):35–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
• Markowitz HM (1976) Investment for the long run: New evidence for an old rule. J. Finance 31(5):1273–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merkle C (2018) The curious case of negative volatility. J. Financial Marketing, 40:92–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RC (1987) A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J. Finance 42(3):483–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell OS, Utkus SP (2003) The role of company stock in defined contribution plans. Mitchell OS, Smetters K, eds. The Pension Challenge: Risk Transfers and Retirement Income Security (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 33–70.Google Scholar
• Nelson LD (2014) False-positives, p-hacking, statistical power, and evidential value [Power Point Slides]. Presented at Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences Summer Institute, Berkeley, CA. Accessed December 28, 2020, http://web.archive.org/web/20190929020751.Google Scholar
• Nieuwerburgh SV, Veldkamp L (2010) Information acquisition and underdiversification. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):779–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obrecht NA, Chapman GB, Gelman R (2007) Intuitive t tests: Lay use of statistical information. Psych. Bull. Rev. 14(6):1147–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J (2014) Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Direction Psych. Sci. 23(3):184–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J (2005) It is whether you win or lose: The importance of overall probabilities of winning or losing in risky choice. J. Risk Uncertainty 30(1):5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J, Laughhunn D, Crum R (1980) Translation of games and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. 26(10):1039–1060.Link, Google Scholar
• Payne J, Laughhunn D, Crum R (1981) Further tests of aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. 27(8):953–958.Link, Google Scholar
• Peterson CR, Beach LR (1967) Man as an intuitive statistician. Psych. Bull. 68(1):29–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polkovnichenko V (2005) Household portfolio diversification: A case for rank dependent preferences. Rev. Financial Stud. 18:1467–1502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollmann MMH, Potters J, Trautmann ST (2014) Risk taking by agents: The role of ex-ante and ex-post accountability. Econom. Lett. 123(3):387–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinholtz N (2015) Persistence in Consumer Search (Columbia University Academic Commons, New York).Google Scholar
• Reynolds DB, Joseph J, Sherwood R (2009) Risky shift vs. cautious shift: Determining differences in risk taking between private and public management decision making. J. Bus. Econom. Res. 7(1):63–77.Google Scholar
• Roy A (1952) Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica 20(3):431–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finance 19(3):425–442.Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF, Alexander GJ, Bailey JW (1998) Investments, 6th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF, Goldstein DG, Blythe PW (2000) The distribution builder: A tool for inferring investor preferences. Accessed December 28, 2020, https://web.archive.org/web/20191111034611/https://web.stanford.edu/∼wfsharpe/art/qpaper/qpaper.pdf.Google Scholar
• Shefrin H, Statman M (2000) Behavioral portfolio theory. J. Financial Quantitative Anal. 35(2):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soll JB, Klayman J (2004) Overconfidence in interval estimates. J. Experiment. Psych. Learning Memory Cognition 30(2):299–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiller SA, Fitzsimons GJ, Lynch JG Jr, McClelland GH (2013) Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. J. Consumer Res. 50(2):277–288.Google Scholar
• Statman M (2020) Five myths about stock diversification. Wall Street Journal (August 8), https://www.wsj.com/articles/5-myths-about-stock-diversification-11596896778).Google Scholar
• Stigler SM (1986) The History of Statistics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• von Gaudecker HM (2015) How does household portfolio diversification vary with financial literacy and financial advice?. J. Finance 489–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstein O (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Zeisberger S (2016) Do people care about loss probabilities? Accessed May 15, 2020, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2169394.Google Scholar
• Zeisberger S (2018) What is risk? How investors perceive risk in return distributions. Accessed December 11, 2020, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811636.Google Scholar