Team Incentives, Social Cohesion, and Performance: A Natural Field Experiment

References

• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O (2018) Social incentives in organizations. Annual Rev. Econom. 10:439–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock P, Bedard K, Charness G, Hartman J, Royer H (2015) Letting down the team? Social effects of team incentives. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(5):841–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakundi P, Harrison DA (2006) Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(1):49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2005) Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):917–962.Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2009) Social connections and incentives in the workplace: Evidence from personnel data. Econometrica 77(4):1047–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2013) Team incentives: Evidence from a firm level experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(5):1079–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron JM, Gjerde KP (1997) Peer pressure in an agency relationship. J. Labor Econom. 15(2):234–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, McLendon CL (2003) Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psych. 88(6):989–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell ST (2007) Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):595–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Herbertz C, Sliwka D (2011) Incentives and cooperation in firms: Field evidence. Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) Discussion Paper No. 5618, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader S, Gartenberg C, Prat A (2020) The contingent effect of management practices. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(2):721–749.Google Scholar
• Böckerman P, Ilmakunnas P (2009) Job disamenities, job satisfaction, quit intentions, and actual separations: Putting the pieces together. Indust. Relations 48(1):73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgess S, Propper C, Ratto M, von Hinke S, Scholder K, Tominey E (2010) Smarter task assignment or greater effort: The impact of incentives on team performance. Econom. J. 120(547):968–989.Google Scholar
• Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2981–3003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carless SA, De Paola C (2000) The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Res. 31(1):71–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Seki E (2011) Do social preferences increase productivity? Field experimental evidence from fishermen in Toyoma Bay. Econom. Inquiry 49(2):612–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Robbett A, Akbar PA (2018) Profit sharing and peer reporting. Management Sci. 64(9):4261–4276.Link, Google Scholar
• Carron AV, Spink KS (1995) The group size-cohesion relationship in minimal groups. Small Group Res. 26(1):86–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P, Martínez-Jerez FA (2009) Relative performance compensation, contests, and dynamic incentives. Management Sci. 55(8):1306–1320.Link, Google Scholar
• Casey-Campbell M, Martens ML (2009) Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion – performance literature. Internat. J. Management Rev. 11(2):223–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Chen Y (2020) Social identity, group behavior, and teams. Annual Rev. Econom. 12(1):691–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rigotti L, Rustichini A (2007) Individual behavior and group membership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1340–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lim N (2013) Should managers use team-based contests? Management Sci. 59(12):2823–2836.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiocchio F, Essiembre H (2009) Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams. Small Group Res. 40(4):382–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark AE (2001) What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Econom. 8(2):223–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corgnet B, Gunia B, González RH (2021) Harnessing the power of social incentives to curb shirking in teams. J. Econom. Management Strategy. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Corgnet B, Hernán-Gonzalez R, Mateo R (2019) Rac(g)e against the machine? Social incentives when humans meet robots. Groupe d’Analyse et de Théorie Economique. Working Paper No. 2019-04, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.Google Scholar
• Cornelissen T (2009) The interaction of job satisfaction, job search, and job changes. An empirical investigation with German panel data. J. Happiness Stud. 10(3):367–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danilov A, Sliwka D (2017) Can contracts signal social norms? Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 63(2):459–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Souverijn M (2020) Team incentives, task assignment, and performance: A field experiment. Leadership Quart. 31:101241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Non A, Verbeke W (2014) Dynamic incentive effects of relative performance pay: A field experiment. Labour Econom. 28:1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Non A, Verbeke W (2015) The effects of prize spread and noise in elimination tournaments: A natural field experiment. J. Labor Econom. 33(3):521–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W (2013) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econom. 31(2):305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2016) Global Human Capital Trends: The New Organizational: Different by Design (Deloitte University Press, London, UK).Google Scholar
• De Paola M, Gioia F, Scoppa V (2019) Free-riding and knowledge spillovers in teams: The role of social ties. Eur. Econom. Rev. 112:74–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deversi M, Kocher MG, Schwieren C (2020) Cooperation in a company: A large-scale experiment. Mimeo, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Dion KL (2000) Group cohesion: From “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics 4(1):7–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drago R, Turnbull GK (1988) Individual vs. group piece rates under team technologies. J. Japanese Internat. Econom. 2(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dur R, Sol J (2010) Social interaction, co-worker altruism, and incentives. Games Econom. Behav. 69(2):293–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Schüßler K (2016) Complementarities of human-resource management practices: A case for a behavioral-economics perspective. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. 172(2):312–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Roider A, Sunde U (2016) The role of communication of performance schemes: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 63(12):4061–4080.Link, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Grimm S, Schindler D, Schudy S (2018) The effect of incentives in non-routine analytical teams tasks: Evidence from a field experiment. CESifo Working Paper No. 6903, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.Google Scholar
• Erev I, Bornstein G, Galili R (1993) constructive intergroup competition as a solution to the free rider problem: A field experiment. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 29(6):463–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1950) Informal social communication. Psych. Rev. 57(5):271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FitzRoy FR, Kraft K (1986) Profitability and profit-sharing. J. Indust. Econom. 35(2):113–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RB, Kruse DL, Blasi JR (2008) The same yet different: Worker reports on labor practices in a single firm across countries. Labour Econom. 15(4):749–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RB, Kruse DL, Blasi JR (2010) Worker responses to shirking under shared capitalism. Kruse DL, Freeman RB, Blasi JR, eds. Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-based Stock Options (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 77–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friebel G, Heinz M, Krueger M, Zubanov N (2017) Team incentives and performance: Evidence from a retail chain. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(8):2168–2203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE (2004) Social cohesion. Annual Rev. Sociol. 30:409–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryer R (2013) Teacher incentives and student achievement: Evidence from New York City public schools. J. Labor Econom. 31(2):373–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallup (2017) State of the American Workplace (Gallup Inc., Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Glewwe P, Ilias N, Kremer M (2010) Teacher incentives. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):205–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2016) Ode to the sea: Workplace organizations and norms of cooperation. Econom. J. 126(595):1856–1883.Google Scholar
• Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S (2006) The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):212–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S, Sutter M (2012) Competition between organizational groups: Its impact on altruistic and antisocial motivations. Management Sci. 58(5):948–960.Link, Google Scholar
• Green JR, Stokey NL (1983) A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. 91(3):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J. Management 26(3):463–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gully SM, Devine DJ, Whitney DJ (1995) A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of levels of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Res. 26(4):70–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison G, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. 45(5):1029–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100(4):801–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller RT (1983) Predicting absenteeism from prior absenteeism, attitudinal factors, and nonattitudinal factors. J. Appl. Psych. 68(3):536–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger A, Schkade D (2008) Sorting in the labor market; do gregarious workers flock to interactive jobs? J. Human Resources 43(4):859–883.Google Scholar
• Lavy V (2002) Evaluating the effect of teachers’ group performance incentives on pupil achievement. J. Political Econom. 110(6):1286–1317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2018) Compensation and incentives in the workplace. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(3):195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, Neckermann S (2014) What field experiments have and have not taught us about managing workers. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 30(4):639–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N, Chen H (2014) When do group incentives for salespeople work? J. Marketing Res. 51(3):320–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Sadoff S, Wagner M (2011) So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):439–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinsey (2016) How Social Tools Can Reshape the Organization (McKinsey & Company, Brussels).Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman RH, Blakely GL (1995) Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 16(2):127–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller CW, Price JL (1990) Economic, psychological, and sociological determinants of voluntary turnover. J. Behav. Econom. 19(3):321–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullen B, Copper C (1994) The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psych. Bull. 155(2):210–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muralidharan K, Sundararaman V (2011) Teacher performance pay: Experimental evidence from India. J. Political Econom. 119(1):39–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nalebuff BJ, Stiglitz JE (1983) Prizes and incentives: Toward a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell J. Econom. 14(1):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishii LH, Mayer DM (2009) Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. J. Appl. Psych. 94(6):1412–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotemberg JJ (1994) Human relations in the workplace. J. Political Econom. 102(4):684–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Stiglitz JE (1984) Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(3):433–444.Google Scholar
• Sheremeta RM (2018) Behavior in group contests: A review of experimental research. J. Econom. Surveys 32(3):683–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sliwka D (2007) Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):999–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sol J (2011) Incentives and social relations in the workplace. PhD thesis, Tinbergen Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations. (Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Meyer JP (1993) Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psych. 46(2):259–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waber B, Magnolfi J, Lindsay G (2014) Workspaces that move people. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(10):68–77.Google Scholar
• Wendt H, Euwema MC, van Emmerik H (2009) Leadership and team cohesiveness across cultures. Leadership Quart. 20(3):358–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Widmeyer WN, Brawley LR, Carron AV (1985) The Measurement of Cohesion in Sports Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire (Sports Dynamics, London, Ontario, Canada).Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA III (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20(20):77–140.Google Scholar
• Zaccaro SJ, Lowe CA (1988) Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. J. Soc. Psych. 128(4):547–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaccaro SJ, McCoy MC (1988) The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 18(10):837–851.Crossref, Google Scholar