Cloud Pricing: The Spot Market Strikes Back
Published Online:25 Feb 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3907
References
- (2012) Fixed and market pricing for cloud services. 2012 Proc. IEEE INFOCOM Workshops (IEEE, New York), 157–162.Google Scholar
- (2017) Fixed and market pricing for cloud services. Preprint, submitted January 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.5621.Google Scholar
- (2013) Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic delay. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):423–443.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Deconstructing Amazon EC2 spot instance pricing. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 1(3):16:1–16:20.Google Scholar
- (2015) Truthful online scheduling with commitments. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput., (ACM, New York, NY), 715–732.Google Scholar
- (2017) Era: A framework for economic resource allocation for the cloud. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web Companion, (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee Republic and Canton of Geneva), 635–642.Google Scholar
- (2015) Pricing in ride-share platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 639.Google Scholar
- (2018) The Datacenter as a Computer: Designing Warehouse-Scale Machines (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA).Google Scholar
- (2019) Online revenue maximization for server pricing. Preprint, submitted June 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09880.Google Scholar
- (2019) Overcommitment in cloud services: Bin packing with chance constraints. Management Sci. 65(7):3255–3271.Link, Google Scholar
- (1981) Introduction to Queueing Theory (North Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
- (2017) Resource central: Understanding and predicting workloads for improved resource management in large cloud platforms. Proc. 26th Sympos. Operating Systems Principles, (ACM, New York, NY), 153–167.Google Scholar
- (2001) Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. 20(3):265–283.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Cloud pricing: The spot market strikes back [extended abstract]. Proc. 20th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput., (ACM, New York, NY), 593.Google Scholar
- (2020) The competitive effects of variance-based pricing. Proc. 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Yokohama, Japan, 362–370.Google Scholar
- (2019) On the cluster admission problem for cloud computing. Proc. 14th Workshop Econom. Networks, Systems Comput. (ACM, New York), Article 8.Google Scholar
- (2019) When fixed price meets priority auctions: Competing firms with different pricing and service rules. Stochastic Systems 9(1):47–80.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Rational Queueing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) On-demand or spot? Selling the cloud to risk-averse customers. Internat. Conf. Web an Internet Econom. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), 73–86.Google Scholar
- (2018) A spot capacity market to increase power infrastructure utilization in multi-tenant data centers. 2018 IEEE Internat. Sympos. High Performance Computer Architecture, 776–788.Google Scholar
- . (2016) Morpheus: Toward automated SLOs for enterprise clusters. Proc. 12th USENIX Conf. Operating Systems Design Implementation, 117–134.Google Scholar
- (2016) Pricing the cloud. IEEE Internet Comput. 20(1):36–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Simple pricing schemes for the cloud. Internat. Conf. Web Internet Econom., 311–324.Google Scholar
- (2013) Dependable demand response management in the smart grid: A Stackelberg game approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4(1):120–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):171–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci. 3(4):288–307.Link, Google Scholar
- (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
- (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) An online auction framework for dynamic resource provisioning in cloud computing. The 2014 ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (ACM, New York), 71–83.Google Scholar
- (2016) Cloud spot markets are not sustainable: The case for transient guarantees. 8th USENIX Workshop Hot Topics Cloud Comput., 13–18.Google Scholar
- (1989) Price discrimination. Handbook of Industrial Organization (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 597–654.Google Scholar
- (1982) Poisson arrivals see time averages. Oper. Res. 30(2):223–231.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Tr-spark: Transient computing for big data analytics. Proc. 7th ACM Sympos. Cloud Comput. (ACM, New York), 484–496.Google Scholar
- (2010) Delay scheduling: A simple technique for achieving locality and fairness in cluster scheduling. Proc. 5th Eur. Conf. Comput. Systems, 265–278.Google Scholar
- (2014) Dynamic resource provisioning in cloud computing: A randomized auction approach. 2014 IEEE Conf. Comput. Comm., 433–441.Google Scholar
- (2016) A framework for truthful online auctions in cloud computing with heterogeneous user demands. IEEE Trans. Comput. 65(3):805–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) On the viability of a cloud virtual service provider. Performance Evaluation Rev. 44(1):235–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) An efficient cloud market mechanism for computing jobs with soft deadlines. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networks 25(2):793–805.Crossref, Google Scholar

