Multiple Beliefs, Dominance and Dynamic Consistency

References

• Al-Najjar NI, Weinstein J (2009) Rejoinder: The ambiguity aversion literature: A critical assessment. Econom. Philos. 25:357–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aumann RJ (1962) Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 30(3):445–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker E, Bosetti V, Salo A (2020) Robust portfolio decision analysis: An application to the energy research and development portfolio problem. European J. Oper. Res. 284(3):1107–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P, Catonini E, Lanzani G, Marinacci M (2019) Ambiguity attitudes and self-confirming equilibrium in sequential games. Games Econom. Behav. 115:1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30:961–981.Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Haim Y (2004) Uncertainty, probability and information-gaps. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 85:249–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, den Hertog D, De Waegenaere A, Melenberg B, Rennen G (2013) Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities. Management Sci. 59:341–357.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Sim M, Zhang M (2019) Adaptive distributionally robust optimization. Management Sci. 65:604–618.Link, Google Scholar
• Bewley TF (2002) Knightian decision theory. Part I. Decisions Econom. Finance 25:79–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown C, Ghile Y, Laverty M, Li K (2012) Decision scaling: Linking bottom-up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector. Water Resources Res. 48(9):W09537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier MK, Papakonstantinou F, Parker JA (2017) Optimal time-inconsistent beliefs: Misplanning, procrastination, and commitment. Management Sci. 63:1318–1340.Link, Google Scholar
• Caldentey R, Liu Y, Lobel I (2017) Intertemporal pricing under minimax regret. Oper. Res. 65:104–129.Link, Google Scholar
• Cox LA (2012) Confronting deep uncertainties in risk analysis. Risk Anal. 32:1607–1629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danan E, Gajdos T, Hill B, Tallon J-M (2016) Robust social decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106:2407–2425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diaz D, Moore F (2017) Quantifying the economic risks of climate change. Nature Climate Change 7:774–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekholm T (2018) Climatic cost-benefit analysis under uncertainty and learning on climate sensitivity and damages. Ecological Econom. 154:99–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein LG, Schneider M (2003) Recursive multiple-priors. J. Econom. Theory 113:1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etner J, Jeleva M, Tallon JM (2012) Decision theory under ambiguity. J. Econom. Surveys 26:234–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geoffrion AM (1968) Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 22:618–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2004) Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory 118:133–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2008) Revealed ambiguity and its consequences: Updating. Abdellaoui M, Hey JD, eds. Advances in Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 3–18.Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18:141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Marinacci M (2016) Ambiguity and the Bayesian paradigm. Arló-Costa H, Hendricks VF, van Benthem J, eds. Readings in Formal Epistemology (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland), 385–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Schmeidler D (2010) Objective and subjective rationality in a multiple prior model. Econometrica 78:755–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y, De Reyck B, Degraeve Z (2008) An integrated decision-making approach for improving European air traffic management. Management Sci. 54:1395–1409.Link, Google Scholar
• Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2001) Temptation and self-control. Econometrica 69:1403–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayashi T (2005) Intertemporal substitution, risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Econom. Theory 25:933–956.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill B (2020) Dynamic consistency and ambiguity: A reappraisal. Games Econom. Behav. 120:289–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Høyland K, Wallace SW (2001) Generating scenario trees for multistage decision problems. Management Sci. 47:295–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson MP, Hurter AP (2000) Decision support for a housing mobility program using a multiobjective optimization model. Management Sci. 46:1569–1584.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1:11–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasprzyk JR, Nataraj S, Reed PM, Lempert RJ (2013) Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change. Environ. Model. Software 42:55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73:1849–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2009) Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences. J. Econom. Theory 144:930–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight F (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Risk (Augustus M. Kelley, New York).Google Scholar
• Knutti R, Hegerl GC (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth’s temperature to radiation changes. Nature Geoscience 1:735–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemoine D, Rudik I (2017) Managing climate change under uncertainty: Recursive integrated assessment at an inflection point. Annu. Rev. Resources Econom. 9:117–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lempert R, Collins M (2007) Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: Comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Anal. 27(4):1009–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lempert RJ, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2003) Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative long-term strategy analysis (RAND, Santa Monica, CA).Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. (London) 92:805–824.Google Scholar
• Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A (2006) Dynamic variational preferences. J. Econom. Theory 128:4–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ (1989) Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econom. Lit. 27:1622–1668.Google Scholar
• Marinacci M (2015) Model uncertainty. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13:1022–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Millner A, Dietz S, Heal G (2013) Scientific ambiguity and climate policy. Environ. Resources Econom. 55:21–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morton A (2014) Aversion to health inequalities in healthcare prioritisation: A multicriteria optimisation perspective. J. Health Econom. 36:164–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordhaus WD (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258:1315–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordhaus WD (2017) Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114:1518–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pindyck RS (2013) Climate change policy: What do the models tell us? J. Econom. Lit. 51:860–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn JD, Reed PM, Keller K (2017) Direct policy search for robust multi-objective management of deeply uncertain socio-ecological tipping points. Environ. Model. Software 92:125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenhead J, Elton M, Gupta SK (1972) Robustness and optimality as criteria for strategic decisions. Oper. Res. Quart. 23(4):413–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (Dover Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Siniscalchi M (2009) Two out of three ain't bad: A comment on the ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment. Econom. & Philos. 25(3):335–356.Google Scholar
• Siniscalchi M (2011) Dynamic choice under ambiguity. Theoret. Econom. 6(3):379–421.Google Scholar
• Stoye J (2012a) New perspectives on statistical decisions under ambiguity. Annu. Rev. Econom. 4:257–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoye J (2012b) Dominance and admissibility without priors. Econom. Lett. 116:118–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strotz RH (1955) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23:165–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Shefrin HM (1981) An economic theory of self-control. J. Political Econom. 89:392–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Pol TD, Gabbert S, Weikard HP, van Ierland EC, Hendrix EMT (2017) A minimax regret analysis of flood risk management strategies under climate change uncertainty and emerging information. Environ. Resources Econom. 68:1087–1109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A (1949) Statistical decision functions. Ann. Math. Statist. 20:165–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang T (2003) Conditional preferences and updating. J. Econom. Theory 108:286–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Sim M (2014) Distributionally robust convex optimization. Oper. Res. 62:1358–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Xidonas P, Mavrotas G, Hassapis C, Zopounidis C (2017) Robust multiobjective portfolio optimization: A minimax regret approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262:299–305.Crossref, Google Scholar