Drivers, Riders, and Service Providers: The Impact of the Sharing Economy on Mobility
Published Online:11 Mar 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3909
References
- (2020) Business models in the sharing economy: Manufacturing durable goods in the presence of peer-to-peer rental markets. Preprint, submitted February 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2891908.Google Scholar
- (2012) Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(2):295–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The average speed of traffic in midtown Manhattan is 4.7 mph. New York thinks it’s found a solution. LA Times (January 24), https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-new-york-traffic-manhattan-20180124-story.html.Google Scholar
- (2017) The potential of servicizing as a green business model. Management Sci. 63(5):1545–1562.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 114(3):462–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(3):556–570.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Peer-to-peer carsharing: Exploring public perception and market characteristics in the San Francisco Bay area, California. Transportation Res. Record J. Transportation Res. Board. 2416(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The cost of convenience: Ridesharing and traffic fatalities. Chicago Booth Research Paper 27, IL.Google Scholar
- (2017) The car sharing economy: Interaction of business model choice and product line design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):185–201.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Operations management in the age of the sharing economy: What is old and what is new? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):93–101.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Drivers, riders and service providers: The impact of the sharing economy on mobility. Proc. 12th Workshop on the Economics of Networks, Systems and Computation (ACM, New York), Article 1.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019a) Dynamic inventory repositioning in on-demand rental networks. Preprint, submitted March 30, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2942921.Google Scholar
- (2021) Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2019b) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65(2):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Dimensioining on-demand vehicle sharing systems. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) The surprising reason some millennials may be buying new cars. The Washington Post (February 28), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2017/02/28/the-surprising-reason-some-millennials-may-be-buying-new-cars/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.785c5fd65cc3.Google Scholar
- (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) On the existence of pure-strategy equilibria in large games. J. Econom. Theory 144(3):1300–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Pricing and matching with forward-looking buyers and sellers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(4):717–734.Google Scholar
- (2014) The usage and impacts of emerging carsharing business models: Evidence from the peer-to-peer and business-to-business market segments. Presentation, Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington DC, January 12, 2014 to January 16, 2014, no. 14-1714, January 12–16, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- (2017) Coopetition and profit sharing for ride-sharing platforms. Working paper, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
- (2015) Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper 6.Google Scholar
- (2013) Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 57:28–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Uber might buy me a Mercedes Benz: An empirical investigation of the sharing economy and durable goods purchase. Preprint, submitted May 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2971072.Google Scholar
- (2017) Service region design for urban electric vehicle sharing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):309–327.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Collaborative consumption: Strategic and economic implications of product sharing. Management Sci. 64(3):1171–1188.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Bike-share systems: Accessibility and availability. Chicago Booth Research Paper 15-04, IL.Google Scholar
- (2004) Large robust games. Econometrica 72(6):1631–1665.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Non-cooperative games with many players. Handbook of Game Theory (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1761–1808.Google Scholar
- (2016) Do on-demand ride-sharing services affect traffic congestion? Evidence from Uber entry. Preprint, submitted August 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2838043.Google Scholar
- (2011) Greenhouse gas emission impacts of carsharing in North America. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 12(4):1074–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) On a theorem of Schmeidler. J. Math. Econom. 13(3):201–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
- New York City (2019) Mayor De Blasio puts into effect for-hire vehicle cruising cap and extends license cap. Accessed August 9, https://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/384-19/mayor-de-blasio-puts-effect-for-hire-vehicle-cruising-cap-extends-license-cap.Google Scholar
- (2015) Impact of car sharing on mobility and CO2 emissions. Technical report, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Accessed January 14, 2021, https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/impact-of-car-sharing-on-mobility-and-co2-emissions.Google Scholar
- San Francisco County Transportation Authority (2018) TNCS & congestion. San Francisco County Transportation Authority draft report. Accessed January 14, 2021, https://www.sfcta.org/projects/tncs-and-congestion.Google Scholar
- (2014) Quantifying the benefits of vehicle pooling with shareability networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111(37):13290–13294.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1973) Equilibrium points of nonatomic games. J. Statist. Physics 7(4):295–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Uber and Lyft don’t reduce cars. Transit does. StreetsBlog USA. Accessed January 8, 2021, https://usa.streetsblog.org/2019/01/08/uber-and-lyft-dont-free-people-from-car-ownership-transit-does/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Models for effective deployment and redistribution of bicycles within public bicycle-sharing systems. Oper. Res. 61(6):1346–1359.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) The clockspeed dilemma. Accessed January 14, 2021, https://advisory.kpmg.us/articles/2017/the-clockspeed-dilemma.html.Google Scholar
- (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
- Taxi and Limousine Commission (2019) Mayor De Blasio puts into effect for-hire vehicle cruising cap and extends license cap. Accessed August 8, https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/tlc/downloads/pdf/rule_statement_substantial_need_08_08_19.pdf.Google Scholar

