An Empirical Bargaining Model with Left-Digit Bias: A Study on Auto Loan Monthly Payments
Published Online:29 Apr 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3923
References
- (2016) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners. Management Sci. 63(6):1657–1672.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: Evidence from field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(1):93–110.Google Scholar
- (2020a) Monthly payment targeting and the demand for maturity. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(11):5416–5462.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020b) Real effects of search frictions in consumer credit markets. Working paper, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
- (2008) Credit constraints in the market for consumer durables: Evidence from micro data on car loans. Internat. Econom. Rev. 49(2):401–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) On the empirical content of cheap-talk signaling: An application to bargaining. J. Political Econom. 127(4):1599–1628.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Sequential bargaining in the field: Evidence from millions of online bargaining interactions. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1319–1361.Google Scholar
- (2006) Consumer cognition and pricing in the nines in oligopolistic markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy 15(1):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Psychological principles in negotiating civil settlements. Harvard Negotiation Law Rev. 4:1.Google Scholar
- (2008) A simultaneous model of consumer brand choice and negotiated price. Management Sci. 54(3):538–549.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Imperfect competition in auto lending: Subjective markup, racial disparity, and class action litigation. Rev. Law Econom. 8(1):21–58.Google Scholar
- (1996) Why bounded rationality? J. Econom. Lit. 34(2):669–700.Google Scholar
- (2005) Do behavioral biases affect prices? J. Finance 60(1):1–34.Google Scholar
- (2010) A larger slice or a larger pie? An empirical investigation of bargaining power in the distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 29(1):57–74.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) The response of drug expenditure to nonlinear contract design: Evidence from Medicare Part D. Quart. J. Econom. 130(2):841–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
- . (2012) Behavioral models of managerial decision-making. Marketing Lett. 23(2):405–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Bargaining ability and competitive advantage: Empirical evidence from medical devices. Management Sci. 60(12):3011–3025.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Update on indirect auto finance dealer compensation litigation and other pertinent litigation. Bus. Lawyer 56(3):1113–1126.Google Scholar
- (2014) Show me the numbers: Precision as a cue to others’ confidence. Psych. Sci. 25(2):633–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Designing dealer compensation in the auto loan market: Implications from a policy experiment. Preprint, submitted October 19, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3702092.Google Scholar
- (2008) Credit elasticities in less-developed economies: Implications for microfinance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1040–1068.Google Scholar
- (2001) Quantile regression. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(4):143–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2206–2236.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Bid takers or market makers? The effect of auctioneers on auction outcome. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 8(4):195–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Debiasing. Koehler DJ, Harvey N, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 316–338.Google Scholar
- (2020) The efficiency of real-world bargaining: Evidence from wholesale used-auto auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2008) “Psychological influence in negotiation: An introduction long overdue. J. Management 34(3):509–531.Google Scholar
- (1973) Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. J. Marketing Res. 10(1):70–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) What matters in a price negotiation: Evidence from the US auto retailing industry. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(4):365–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Comparative judgments of multidigit numbers. J. Experiment. Psychol. 10(1):32.Google Scholar
- (2015) Focal points and bargaining in housing markets. Games Econom. Behav. 93:89–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Do taxpayers bunch at kink points? Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 2(3):180–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Increased consumer sales response though use of 99-ending prices. J. Retailing 72(2):187–199.Google Scholar
- (1997) An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. J. Consumer Res. 24(1):57–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) More than a penny’s worth: Left-digit bias and firm pricing. Preprint, submitted July 2, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3413019.Google Scholar
- (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: the left-digit effect in price cognition. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):54–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The price precision effect: Evidence from laboratory and market data. Marketing Sci. 29(1):175–190.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Bias in strategic initiative continuance decisions: Framing interactions and HRD practices. Management Decisions 50(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Round off the bargaining: The effects of offer roundness on willingness to accept. J. Consum. Res. 44(2):381–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Price bargaining and competition in online platforms: An empirical analysis of the daily deal market. Marketing Sci. 39(4):687–706.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) ‘Meet me halfway’: The value of bargaining. Preprint, submitted June 19, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2988631.Google Scholar

