The Performance of Time-Preference and Risk-Preference Measures in Surveys

References

• Ahn T (2010) Attitudes toward risk and self-employment of young workers. Labour Econom. 17(2):434–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison G, Lau M, Rutström EE (2006) Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experiment. Econom. 9:383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Glenn W, Harrison MIL, Rutström EE (2008) Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76(3):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson LR, Mellor JM (2008) Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference. J. Health Econom. 27(5):1260–1274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Kuhn MA (2019) Is it safe to measure risk preferences? Assessing the completeness, predictive validity, and measurement error of various techniques. Working paper, University of California, San Diego, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2012) Estimating time preferences from convex budget sets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3333–3356.journalCrossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Kuhn MA, Sprenger C (2015) Measuring time preferences: A comparison of experimental methods. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116:451–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Karlan D, Yin W (2006) Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):635–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augenblick N, Niederle M, Sprenger C (2015) Working over time: Dynamic inconsistency in real effort tasks. Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1067–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsky RB, Juster FT, Kimball MS, Shapiro MD (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):537–579.Google Scholar
• Beauchamp J, Cesarini D, Johannesson M (2017) The psychometric and empirical properties of measures of risk preferences. J. Risk Uncertainty 54:203–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (2005) Risk preference instability across institutions: A dilemma. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 102(11):4209–4214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blais A-R, Weber EU (2006) A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgmental Decision Making 1(1):33–47.Google Scholar
• Blumenstock J, Callen M, Ghani T (2018) Why do defaults affect behavior? Experimental evidence from Afghanistan. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(10):2868–2901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonin H, Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U (2007) Cross-sectional earnings risk and occupational sorting: The role of risk attitudes. Labour Econom. 14(6):926–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borghans L, GolsteynBHH (2006) Time discounting and the body mass index: Evidence from the Netherlands. Econom. Human Biology 4(1):39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradford D, Courtemanche C, Heutel G, McAlvanah P, Ruhm C (2017) Time preferences and consumer behavior. J. Risk Uncertainty 55:119–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burks S, Carpenter J, Götte L, Rustichini A (2012) Which measures of time preference best predict outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(1):308–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burks SV, Carpenter JP, Goette L, Rustichini A (2009) Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment, Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 106(19):7745–7750.Google Scholar
• Chabris CF, Laibson D, Morris CL, Schuldt JP, Taubinsky D (2008) Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. J. Risk Uncertainty 37(2-3):237–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman J, Dean M, Ortoleva P, Snowberg E, Camerer CF (2018) Econographics. NBER Working Paper 24931, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U, Imas A (2013) Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 87:43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chuang Y, Schechter L (2015) Stability of experimental and survey measures of risk, time, and social preferences: A review and some new results. J. Development Econom. 117:151–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Condon DM, Revelle W (2014) The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence 43:52–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courtemanche C, Heutel G, McAlvanah P (2015) Impatience, incentives and obesity. Econom. J. (London) 125(582):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosetto P, Filippin A (2016) A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods. Experiment. Econom. 19(3):613–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daly M, Harmon CP, Delaney L (2009) Psychological and biological foundations of time preference. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):659–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dave C, Eckel CC, Johnson CA, Rojas C (2010) Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? J. Risk Uncertainty 41(3):219–243.Google Scholar
• Dean M, Ortoleva P (2015) Is it all connected? A testing ground for unified theories of behavioral economics phenomena. Preprint, submitted August 14, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2643355.Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U (2010) Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1238–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 68(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhauer JG, Ventura L (2006) The prevalence of hyperbolic discounting: Some European evidence. Appl. Econom. 38:1223–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen T, Enke B, Huffman D, Sunde U (2018) Global evidence on economic preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 133(4):1645–1692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen T, Huffman D, Sunde U (2016) The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9674, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Frey R, Pedroni A, Rui M, Rieskamp J, Hertwig R (2017) Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Sci. Adv. 3(10):e1701381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galizzi MM, Machado SR, Miniaci R (2016) Temporal stability, cross-validity, and external validity of risk preferences measures: Experimental evidence from a UK representative sample. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Gaudecker H-MV (2015) How does household portfolio diversificaiton vary with financial literacy and financial advice. J. Finance 70(2):489–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goda GS, Levy MR, Manchester CF, Sojourner A, Tasoff J (2019) Predicting retirement savings using survey measures of exponential-growth bias and present bias. Econom. Inquiry 57(3):1636–1658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JW (2009) Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annu. Rev. Psych. 60:549–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Stixrud J, Urzua S (2006) The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. J. Labor Econom. 24(3):411–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R, Wulff DU, Mata R (2019) Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference. Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. London B Biological Sci. 374(20180140).Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Google Scholar
• Hung AA, Parker AM, Yoong JK (2009) Defining and measuring financial literacy. RAND Labor and Population Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
• Kamakura WA, Wedel M (2000) Factor analysis and missing data. J. Marketing Res. 37:490–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Kremer M, Mullainathan S (2015) Self-control at work. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1227–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khwaja A, Sloan F, Salm M (2006) Evidence on preferences and subjective beliefs of risk takers: The case of smokers. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 24(4):667–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby KN, Maraković NN (1996) Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 3:100–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 62(2):443–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusardi A, Mitchell O (2007) Financial literacy and retirement planning: New evidence from the Rand American Life Panel. University of Michigan Retirement Research Center Working Paper 2007-157, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Lusardi A, Mitchell OS (2014) The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Literature 52(1):5–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mata R, Frey R, Richter D, Schupp J, Hertwig R (2018) Risk preference: A view from psychology. J. Econom. Perspective 32(2):155–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier S, Sprenger C (2010) Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(1):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon M, Perali F (2009) Eliciting risk and time preferences in field experiments: Are they related to cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes? Are circumstances important? Riv. Internat. Sci. Soc. 117(3/4):593–629.Google Scholar
• Pedroni A, Frey R, Bruhin A, Dutilh G, Ralph HJR (2017) The risk elicitation puzzle. Natl. Human Behav. 1:803–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stango V, Yoong J, Zinman J (2017a) The quest for parsimony in behavioral economics: new methods and evidence on three. NBER Working Paper No. 23057, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Stango V, Yoong J, Zinman J (2017b) Quicksand or bedrock for behavioral economics? Assessing foundational empirical questions. NBER Working Paper 23625, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q (2010) Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):557–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Truxillo C (2005) Maximum likelihood parameter estimation with incomplete data. Proc. 30th Annual SAS (r) Users Group Internat. Conf., 111–130.Google Scholar
• van Rooij M, Lusardi A, Alessie R (2011) Financial literacy and stock market participation. J. Financial Econom. 101(2):449–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Blais A-R, Betz NE (2002) A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J. Behav. Decision Making 15(4):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar