Product Lines and Price Discrimination in Markets with Information Frictions
Published Online:19 Apr 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3941
References
- (1999) Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond model. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):719–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Ordered consumer search. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(5):989–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Search, design, and market structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):1140–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Information gatekeepers on the Internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):454–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Competition and price dispersion in the U.S. airline industry. J. Political Econom. 102(4):653–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Product-line rivalry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(3):323–334.Google Scholar
- (1983) Equilibrium price dispersion. Econometrica 51(4):955–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Competition and price discrimination in Yellow Pages advertising. RAND J. Econom. 36(2):378–390.Google Scholar
- (1933) The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (1989) Multiproduct duopolists. Econometrica 57(3):533–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) An empirical analysis of algorithmic pricing on Amazon Marketplace. Bourdeau J, Hendler J, Nkambou R, eds. WWW ‘16: Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva), 1339–1349.Google Scholar
- (2007) Monopoly quality degradation in cable television. J. Law Econom. 50(1):181–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1971) A model of price adjustment. J. Econom. Theory 3(2):156–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) A model of add-on pricing. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):585–637.Google Scholar
- (2018) Competing with superstars in the mobile app market. Working paper, NET Institute.Google Scholar
- (2020) A model of search with price discrimination. Eur. Econom. Rev. 129:103571.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) Quality and quantity competition. Bell J. Econom. 14(3):590–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Guided search. Working paper, Humboldt University, Berlin.Google Scholar
- (2019) Competitive screening under heterogeneous information. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(4):1590–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Product line rivalry with brand differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. 41(3):223–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Using price distributions to estimate search costs. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):257–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Consumer search and double marginalization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(6):1683–1710.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Multiproduct quality competition: Fighting brands and product line pruning. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):749–774.Google Scholar
- Johnson JP, Myatt DP (2015) The properties of product line prices. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 43(1):182–188.Google Scholar
- (2019) Relative price dispersion: Evidence and theory. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 11(3):68–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Equilibrium product lines: Competing head-to-head may be less competitive. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(4):740–755.Google Scholar
- (2004) Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. 23(4):490–499.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Price discrimination in Broadway theater. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):520–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Nonlinear pricing in an oligopoly market: The case of specialty coffee. RAND J. Econom. 38(3):513–533.Google Scholar
- (1995) Multiproduct equilibrium price dispersion. J. Econom. Theory 67(1):83–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Miravete J, Röller LH (2004) Estimating price-cost markups under nonlinear pricing competition. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 2(2–3):526–535.Google Scholar
- (1988) Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 7(2):141–168.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Prices and heterogeneous search costs. RAND J. Econom. 48(1):125–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. 61(4):427–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Why do manufacturers issue coupons? An empirical analysis of breakfast cereals? RAND J. Econom. 33(2):319–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Consumer obfuscation by a multiproduct firm. RAND J. Econom. 49(1):206–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Consumer search and retail market structure. Management Sci. 65(6):2607–2623.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Mixed pricing in online marketplaces. Quant. Marketing Econom. 14(2):129–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Multiproduct pricing in oligopoly. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(2):231–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Price discrimination and retail configuration. J. Political Econom. 99(1):30–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Nonlinear pricing and oligopoly. J. Econom. Management Strategy 4(4):529–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (1980) A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(4):651–659.Google Scholar
- (1999) Product line rivalry and market segmentation - with an application to automobile optional engine pricing. J. Indust. Econom. 47(4):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Communication strategies and product line design. Marketing Sci. 23(3):304–316.Link, Google Scholar
- (1986) Product line rivalry: Note. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):842–844.Google Scholar
- (2011) An empirical model of search with vertically differentiated products. RAND J. Econom. 42(4):729–757.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) True monopolistic competition as a result of imperfect information. Quart. J. Econom. 101(3):493–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Multiproduct search and the joint search effect. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(9):2918–2939.Crossref, Google Scholar

