Climate Regulation and Emissions Abatement: Theory and Evidence from Firms’ Disclosures
References
- (2016) Transition to clean technology. J. Political Econom. 124(1):52–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Barbalau A, Zeni F (2023) The optimal design of green securities. Preprint, submitted October 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4155721.Google Scholar
- (2020) Pricing uncertainty induced by climate change. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(3):1024–1066.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Bias B, Landier A (2022) Emissions caps and investment in green technologies. Preprint, submitted May 10, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4100087.Google Scholar
- (2021a) Do investors care about carbon risk? J. Financial Econom. 142(2):517–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021b) Firm commitments. Columbia Business School research paper, Columbia Business School, New York.Google Scholar
- (2021) Updating the United States government’s social cost of carbon. Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2021-04, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (2015) Breaking the tragedy of the horizon—Climate change and financial stability. Speech given at Lloyd’s of London, London, September 29, 2015, https://www.bis.org/review/r151009a.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2022) Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. Accounting Rev. 97(1):147–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. Financial Econom. 131(3):693–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Corporate green bonds. J. Financial Econom. 142(2):499–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Cheap talk and cooperation in Stackelberg games. CEJOR Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. 25(2):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. J. Finance 74(6):2789–2837.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Corporate political connections and favorable environmental regulatory enforcement. Management Sci. 69(12):7838–7859.Link, Google Scholar
- Hoepner AGF, Oikonomou I, Sautner Z, Starks LT, Zhou X (2018) ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. Preprint, submitted November 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2874252.Google Scholar
- (2021) Welfare consequences of sustainable finance. NBER Working Paper No. 28595, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2002) The timing of new technology adoption: Theoretical models and empirical evidence. Manchester School 70(1):56–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Measuring innovation in energy technologies: Green patents as captured by WIPO’s IPC green inventory. World Intellectual Property Organization Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 44, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
- (2009) Investment-based expected stock returns. J. Political Econom. 117(6):1105–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: Evidence from the CDP global 500 report. J. Internat. Financial Management Accounting 23(2):93–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. J. Financial Econom. 27(2):595–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Using a free permit rule to forecast the marginal abatement cost of proposed climate policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(3):748–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Estimates of the social cost of carbon: Concepts and results from the dice-2013r model and alternative approaches. J. Assoc. Environ. Resource Econom. 1(1/2):273–312.Google Scholar
- (2020) Political activism and firm innovation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 55(3):989–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Sustainable investing in equilibrium. J. Financial Econom. 142(2):550–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Dynamic risk management. J. Financial Econom. 111(2):271–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Climate-change pledges, actions and outcomes. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 19(6):2958–2991.Google Scholar
- (2011) The social cost of carbon. Annual Rev. Resour. Econom. 3(1):419–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. J. Banking Finance 98(2019):39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Impact of political connections on corporate environmental performance: From a green development perspective. Sustainability 11(5):1317.Crossref, Google Scholar

