Prior Information and Consumer Search: Evidence from Eye Tracking

References

• Ackerberg DA (2001) Empirically distinguishing informative and prestige effects of advertising. RAND J. Econom. 32(2):316–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerberg DA (2003) Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: An empirical examination. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(3):1007–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman J, Park CW (1980) Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phases of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):234–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large-scale field experiment. Econometrica 83(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branco F, Sun M, Villas-Boas JM (2012) Optimal search for product information. Management Sci. 58(11):2037–2056.Link, Google Scholar
• Branco F, Sun M, Villas-Boas JM (2015) Too much information? Information provision and search costs. Marketing Sci. 35(4):605–618.Link, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B, Kim J, Mela C (2016) Zooming in on choice: How do consumers search for cameras online? Marketing Sci. 35(5):693–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Brucks M (1985) The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. J. Consumer Res. 12(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Johnson EJ (2004) Thinking about attention in games: Backward and forward induction. Brocas I, Carrillo JD, eds. The Psychology of Economic Decisions Volume 2: Reasons and Choices (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom), 111–129.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yao S (2017) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.Link, Google Scholar
• Chick SE, Frazier P (2012) Sequential sampling with economics of selection procedures. Management Sci. 58(3):550–569.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Ishihara M (2010) The effects of detailing on prescribing decisions under quality uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(2):123–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Erdem T, Keane MP (2013) Learning models: An assessment of progress, challenges, and new developments. Marketing Sci. 32(6):913–938.Link, Google Scholar
• Clark CR, Doraszelski U, Draganska M (2009) The effect of advertising on brand awareness and perceived quality: An empirical investigation using panel data. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(2):207–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dang CI, Ursu RM, Chintagunta PK (2023) Why do consumers search products more than once and why should we care? Insights from a website we built and from field data. Working paper, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
• De los Santos B, Koulayev S (2017) Optimizing click-through in online rankings with endogenous search refinement. Marketing Sci. 36(4):542–564.Link, Google Scholar
• De los Santos B, Hortaçsu A, Wildenbeest M (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukes A, Liu L (2015) Online shopping intermediaries: The strategic design of search environments. Management Sci. 62(4):1064–1077.Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP, Öncü TS, Strebel J (2005) Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(3):207–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson DI (2000) A boundedly rational decision algorithm. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):433–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson D, Moloche G, Weinberg S (2006) Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1043–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardete P, Antill M (2020) Guiding consumers through lemons and peaches: A dynamic model of search over multiple characteristics. Working paper, Nova School of Business and Economics, Portugal.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis P, Li B (2019) Modeling consumer footprints on search engines: An interplay with social media. Management Sci. 65(3):1363–1385.Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR (2014) Consideration-set heuristics. J. Bus. Res. 67(8):1688–1699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgson C, Lewis G (2023) You can lead a horse to water: Spatial learning and path dependence in consumer search. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honka E, Chintagunta P (2016) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the US auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.Link, Google Scholar
• Honka E, Hortaçsu A, Vitorino MA (2017) Advertising, consumer awareness, and choice: Evidence from the US banking industry. RAND J. Econom. 48(3):611–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Dang C, Chintagunta PK (2019) Search and learning at a daily deals website. Marketing Sci. 38(4):609–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Kayaba Y, Shum M (2013) Nonparametric learning rules from bandit experiments: The eyes have it! Games Econom. Behav. 81:215–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Ansari A, Gupta S (2007) A model of consumer learning for service quality and usage. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):529–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jerath K, Ren Q (2021) Consumer rational (in)attention to favorable and unfavorable product information, and firm information design. J. Marketing Res. 58(2):343–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jindal P, Aribarg A (2021) The importance of price beliefs in consumer search. J. Marketing Res., 58(2):321–342.Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Russo JE (1984) Product familiarity and learning new information. J. Consumer Res. 11(1):542–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ke TT, Villas-Boas JM (2019) Optimal learning before choice. J. Econom. Theory 180:383–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ke TT, Shen ZJM, Villas-Boas JM (2016) Search for information on multiple products. Management Sci. 62(12):3576–3603.Link, Google Scholar
• Koulayev S (2013) Search with dirichlet priors: Estimation and implications for consumer demand. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 31(2):226–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koulayev S (2014) Search for differentiated products: Identification and estimation. RAND J. Econom. 45(3):553–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu J, Hutchinson J (2020) Information search within a web page: Boundedly rational models of eye movements and clicks. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
• Ma L (2019) Only the interested learn–A model of proactive learning of product reviews. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK (1982) Information load and consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res. 8(4):419–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinovici A, Pieters R, Erdem T (2023) Attention trajectories capture utility accumulation and predict brand choice. J. Marketing Res., 60(4):625–645.Google Scholar
• Meißner M, Musalem A, Huber J (2016) Eye tracking reveals processes that enable conjoint choices to become increasingly efficient with practice. J. Marketing Res. 53(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore WL, Lehmann DR (1980) Individual differences in search behavior for a nondurable. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):296–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy S, Ratchford BT, Talukdar D (1997) Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Consumer Res. 23(4):263–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morozov I, Seiler S, Dong X, Hou L (2021) Estimation of preference heterogeneity in markets with costly search. Marketing Sci. 40(5):871–899.Link, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Manchanda P (2009) Heterogeneous learning and the targeting of marketing communication for new products. Marketing Sci. 28(3):424–441.Link, Google Scholar
• Ning Z, Villas-Boas JM (2022) Browse or experience. Working paper, University of British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
• Orquin JL, Loose SM (2013) Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica 144(1):190–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):366–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Punj GN, Staelin R (1983) A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. J. Consumer Res. 9(4):366–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi SW, Wedel M, Pieters F (2013) Information acquisition during online decision making: A model-based exploration using eye-tracking data. Management Sci. 59(5):1009–1026.Link, Google Scholar
• Shin S, Misra S, Horsky D (2012) Disentangling preferences and learning in brand choice models. Marketing Sci. 31(1):115–137.Link, Google Scholar
• Small KA, Rosen HS (1981) Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica 49(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan N, Agrawal J (1988) The relationship between prior knowledge and external search. Houston MJ, ed. Advances in Consumer Research (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), 27–31.Google Scholar
• Srinivasan N, Ratchford BT (1991) An empirical test of a model of external search for automobiles. J. Consumer Res. 18(2):233–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait J, Adamowicz W (2001) The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching. J. Consumer Res. 28(1):135–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tehrani SS, Ching AT (2023) A heuristic approach to explore: Value of perfect information. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
• Terui N, Ban M, Allenby GM (2011) The effect of media advertising on brand consideration and choice. Marketing Sci. 30(1):74–91.Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, de Jong MG, Stieger D, Füller J (2012) Measuring consumer preferences using conjoint poker. Marketing Sci. 31(1):138–156.Link, Google Scholar
• Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai YL, Honka E (2021) Informational and noninformational advertising content. Marketing Sci. 40(6):1030–1058.Google Scholar
• Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.Link, Google Scholar
• Ursu RM, Wang Q, Chintagunta PK (2020) Search duration. Marketing Sci. 39(5):849–871.Link, Google Scholar
• Ursu RM, Zhang Q, Honka E (2022) Search gaps and consumer fatigue. Marketing Sci. 42(1):110–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Pieters R (2000) Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Sci. 19(4):297–312.Link, Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Pieters R (2008) Eye tracking for visual marketing. Foundations Trends Marketing 1(4):231–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang L, Toubia O, De Jong MG (2015) A bounded rationality model of information search and choice in preference measurement. J. Marketing Res. 52(2):166–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yavorsky D, Honka E, Chen K (2021) Consumer search in the U.S. auto industry: The role of dealership visits. Quant. Marketing Econom. 19(1):1–52.Crossref, Google Scholar