Social Learning in Prosumption: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

References

• Alba JW, Hutchinson JW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):411–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora N, Dreze X, Ghose A, Hess JD, Iyengar R, Jing B, Joshi Y, et al. (2008) Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice. Marketing Lett. 19(3–4):305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atakan SS, Bagozzi RP, Yoon C (2014) Consumer participation in the design and realization stages of production: How self-production shapes consumer evaluations and relationships to products. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 31(4):395–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR (2013) Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(4):60–69.Google Scholar
• Burroughs JE, Moreau CP, Mick DG (2008) Toward a psychology of consumer creativity. Haugtvedt CP, Herr PM, Kardes FR, eds., Handbook of Consumer Psychology (Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Oxfordshire, UK), 1011–1038.Google Scholar
• Burroughs JE, Dahl DW, Moreau CP, Chattopadhyay A, Gorn GJ (2011) Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. J. Marketing 75(4):53–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2017) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandler J, Chen S (2015) Prosumer motivations in service experiences. J. Service Theory Practice 25(2):220–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen PY, Hong Y, Liu Y (2018) The value of multidimensional rating systems: Evidence from a natural experiment and randomized experiments. Management Sci. 64(10):4629–4647.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang Q, Xie J (2011) Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth vs. observational learning. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):238–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl DW, Moreau CP (2007) Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. J. Marketing Res. 44(3):357–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellaert BG, Stremersch S (2005) Marketing mass-customized products: Striking a balance between utility and complexity. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):219–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, Schreier M (2010) Why customers value self-designed products: The importance of process effort and enjoyment. J. Product Innovation Management 27(7):1020–1031.Google Scholar
• Franke N, Keinz P, Steger CJ (2009) Testing the value of customization: When do customers really prefer products tailored to their preferences? J. Marketing 73(5):103–121.Google Scholar
• Godinho de Matos M, Ferreira P, Smith MD, Telang R (2016) Culling the herd: Using real-world randomized experiments to measure social bias with known costly goods. Management Sci. 62(9):2563–2580.Link, Google Scholar
• Heidenreich S, Wittkowski K, Handrich M, Falk T (2015) The dark side of customer co-creation: Exploring the consequences of failed co-created services. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 43(3):279–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K, Sorensen A, Wiseman T (2012) Observational learning and demand for search goods. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 4(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hildebrand C, Häubl G, Herrmann A (2014) Product customization via starting solutions. J. Marketing Res. 51(6):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang T, Liang C, Wang J (2017) The value of “bespoke”: Demand learning, preference learning, and customer behavior. Management Sci. 64(7):2973–3468.Google Scholar
• Johnson CS, Stapel DA (2007) No pain, no gain: The conditions under which upward comparisons lead to better performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(6):1051.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karmarkar US, Roels G (2015) An analytical framework for value co-production in services. Service Sci. 7(3):163–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirmani A, Rao AR (2000) No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J. Marketing 64(2):66–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Telang R (2011) Product customization and customer service costs: An empirical analysis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):347–360.Link, Google Scholar
• Lang B, Dolan R, Kemper J, Northey G (2021) Prosumers in times of crisis: Definition, archetypes and implications. J. Service Management 32(2):176–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YJ, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Levy A (2015) The anti-Amazon that’s making money: Zazzle. CNBC (July 29), https://www.cnbc.com/2015/07/29/the-anti-amazon-thats-making-money-zazzle.html.Google Scholar
• Li X, Wu L (2018) Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon. MIS Quart. 42(4):1331–1351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mochon D, Norton MI, Ariely D (2012) Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 29(4):363–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreau CP (2011) Inviting the amateurs into the studio: Understanding how consumer engagement in product design creates value. J. Production Innovation Management 28(3):409–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreau CP, Dahl DW (2005) Designing the solution: The impact of constraints on consumers’ creativity. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreau CP, Herd KB (2010) To each his own? How comparisons with others influence consumers’ evaluations of their self-designed products. J. Consumer Res. 36(5):806–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T (2003) Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psych. Rev. 110(3):472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Rüter K, Epstude K (2004) The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(6):832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinkus RT, Lockwood P, Schimmack U, Fournier MA (2008) For better and for worse: Everyday social comparisons between romantic partners. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(5):1180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randall T, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2007) Research note—User design of customized products. Marketing Sci. 26(2):268–280.Link, Google Scholar
• Retana GF, Forman C, Wu DJ (2015) Proactive customer education, customer retention, and demand for technology support: Evidence from a field experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(1):34–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Ritzer G, Jurgenson N (2010) Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer.’ J. Consumer Culture 10(1):13–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roels G (2014) Optimal design of coproductive services: Interaction and work allocation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(4):578–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Karmarkar US, Carr S (2010) Contracting for collaborative services. Management Sci. 56(5):849–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Ed. Psych. 25(1):54–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin D, He S, Lee GM, Whinston AB, Cetintas S, Lee KC (2020) Enhancing social media analysis with visual data analytics: A deep learning approach. MIS Quart. 44(4):1459–1492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun T, Viswanathan S, Zheleva E (2021) Creating social contagion through firm-mediated message design: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 67(2):661–1328.Google Scholar
• Sun T, Jung J, Bapna R, Golden J (2018) The impact of social learning in prosumption. Proc. ICIS (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar
• Sweeney JC, Soutar GN, Johnson LW (1999) The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. J. Retailing 75(1):77–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troye SV, Supphellen M (2012) Consumer participation in coproduction: “I made it myself” effects on consumers’ sensory perceptions and evaluations of outcome and input product. J. Marketing 76(2):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (2001) Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 42(4):82.Google Scholar
• Wigfield A, Eccles JS (2000) Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contempory Ed. Psych. 25(1):68–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xue M, Field JM (2008) Service coproduction with information stickiness and incomplete contracts: Implications for consulting services design. Production Oper. Management 17(3):357–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xue M, Hitt LM, Chen PY (2011) Determinants and outcomes of Internet banking adoption. Management Sci. 57(2):291–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Yadav MS, Pavlou PA (2014) Marketing in computer-mediated environments: Research synthesis and new directions. J. Marketing 78(1):20–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the US kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Chen GH, Ferreira P, Smith MD (2021) Consumer behavior in the online classroom: Using video analytics and machine learning to understand the consumption of video courseware. J. Marketing Res. 58(6):1079–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar