Human Decision Making in Dynamic Resource Allocation

References

• Ballinger TP, Hudson E, Karkoviata L, Wilcox NT (2011) Saving behavior and cognitive abilities. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):349–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastani H, Bastani O, Sinchaisri WP (2025) Improving human sequential decision-making with reinforcement learning. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Murphy RO, Rapoport A (2008) Decision biases in revenue management: Some behavioral evidence. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):625–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker-Peth M, Hoberg K, Protopappa-Sieke M (2019) Multiperiod inventory management with budget cycles: Rational and behavioral decision-making. Production Oper. Management 29(3):643–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Qi A (2024) To communicate or not? Interfirm communication in collaborative projects. Management Sci. 70(5):3225–3244.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Qi A, Ríos I (2025) Behavioral externalities of process automation. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Bendoly E (2011) Linking task conditions to physiology and judgment errors in RM systems. Production Oper. Management 20(6):860–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E (2013) Real-time feedback and booking behavior in the hospitality industry: Moderating the balance between imperfect judgment and imperfect prescription. J. Oper. Management 31(1–2):62–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benhabib J, Bisin A (2005) Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-savings decisions. Games Econom. Behav. 52(2):460–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Thonemann UW (2012) Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Sci. 58(12):2225–2233.Link, Google Scholar
• Bostian AA, Holt CA, Smith AM (2008) Newsvendor “pull-to-center” effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):590–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Chua ZE, Camerer CF (2009) Learning and visceral temptation in dynamic saving experiments. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):197–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carbone E (2006) Understanding intertemporal choices. Appl. Econom. 38(8):889–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carbone E, Duffy J (2014) Lifecycle consumption plans, social learning and external habits: Experimental evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 106(1):413–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Graham M, Wolf J (2013) Cognitive ability and strategic sophistication. Games Econom. Behav. 80(1):115–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.Link, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P, Fréchette G (2019) Strategy choice in the infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(11):3929–3952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehl E, Sterman JD (1995) Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 62(2):198–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donohue K, Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2020) Behavioral operations: Past, present, and future. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):191–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Duffy J (2016) Macroeconomics: A survey of laboratory research. John KH, Alvin RE, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 1–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enke B, Gneezy U, Hall BJ, Martin D, Nelidov V, Offerman T, de Ven J (2023) Cognitive biases: Mistakes or missing stakes? Rev. Econom. Statist. 105(4):818–832.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspectives 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Rand DG, Dreber A (2012) Slow to anger and fast to forgive: Cooperation in an uncertain world. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):720–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Technical report, University Library of Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y, Erat S, Wooten J, Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S (2018) New product development and project management decisions. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey JD (1982) Search for rules for search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):65–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey JD, Dardanoni V (1988) Optimal consumption under uncertainty: An experimental investigation. Econom. J. 98(390):105–116.Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagan E, Leider S, Şahin O (2025) Sequential decision making: From decision elicitation to strategy identification. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Leider S, Şahin O (2014) Contracts, biases, and consumption of access services. Management Sci. 60(9):2198–2222.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Leider S, Beil DR, Duenyas I (2021) Running online experiments using web-conferencing software. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 7(2):167–183. Google Scholar
• Long X, Nasiry J, Wu Y (2020) A behavioral study on abandonment decisions in multistage projects. Management Sci. 66(5):1999–2016.Link, Google Scholar
• Meissner T (2016) Intertemporal consumption and debt aversion: An experimental study. Experiment. Econom. 19(2):281–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papastavrou JD, Rajagopalan S, Kleywegt AJ (1996) The dynamic and stochastic knapsack problem with deadlines. Management Sci. 42(12):1706–1718.Link, Google Scholar
• Romero J, Rosokha Y (2018) Constructing strategies in the indefinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma game. Eur. Econom. Rev. 104(1):185–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt JB, Calantone RJ (2002) Escalation of commitment during new product development. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 30(2):103–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schunk D, Winter J (2009) The relationship between risk attitudes and heuristics in search tasks: A laboratory experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 71(2):347–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale DA, Rapoport A (1997) Sequential decision making with relative ranks: An experimental investigation of the “secretary problem”. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 69(3):221–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale DA, Rapoport A (2000) Optimal stopping behavior with relative ranks: The secretary problem with unknown population size. J. Behav. Decision Making 13(4):391–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD, Yang MC (2020) Product Design and Development, 7th ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Vespa E (2020) An experimental investigation of cooperation in the dynamic common pool game. Internat. Econom. Rev. 61(1):417–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson AJ, Vespa E (2020) Information transmission under the shadow of the future: An experiment. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 12(4):75–98.Crossref, Google Scholar