Management Practices and Resilience to Shocks: Evidence from COVID-19
References
- (1999) High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica 67(2):251–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Turbulence, firm decentralization, and growth in bad times. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 13(1):133–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Aggregate and firm-level stock returns during pandemics, in real time. NBER Working Paper No. w26950, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2020) Surveying business uncertainty. J. Econometrics 231(1):282–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Family ownership during the Covid-19 pandemic. J. Banking Finance 135:106385.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ. Sci. 20(2):410–421.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Why working from home will stick. NBER Working Paper No. 28731, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2020) The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(30):17656–17666.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Management practices, workforce selection, and productivity. J. Labor Econom. 36(S1):S371–S409.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? J. Econom. Perspect. 24(1):203–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Management as a technology? NBER Working Paper No. 22327, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2022) Management and misallocation in Mexico. NBER Working Paper No. 29717, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2013) Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Business-level expectations and uncertainty. Working Paper No. 28259, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2019) What drives differences in management practices? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(5):1648–1683.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The impact of consulting services on small and medium enterprises: Evidence from a randomized trial in Mexico. J. Political Econom. 126(2):635–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
- . (2013) Complementarity in organizations. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 11–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Sudden stop: When did firms anticipate the potential consequences of COVID-19? German Econom. Rev. 23(1):79–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of West German wage inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 128(3):967–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1449–1492.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Economic adjustment during the great recession: The role of managerial quality. NBER Working Paper No. 27954, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2018) Management in Pakistan: Performance and conflict. International Growth Centre Working Paper, International Growth Centre, London.Google Scholar
- (2022) Performance stability among small and medium-sized enterprises during COVID-19: A test of the efficacy of dynamic capabilities. Internat. Small Bus. J. 40(3):403–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Inflation expectations and firm decisions: New causal evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 135(1):165–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Building a productive workforce: The role of structured management practices. Management Sci. 67(12):7308–7321.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Statistical learning from ranking data: Italian firms’ strategies and preferences during COVID-19 crisis. Mimeo (Bank of Italy, Rome).Google Scholar
- (2023) Nonparametric difference-in-differences in repeated cross-sections with continuous treatments. J. Econometrics 234(2):664–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Dynamic capabilities, value creation and value capture: Evidence from SMEs under COVID-19 lockdown in Poland. PLoS One 16(6):e0252423.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Working remotely? Selection, treatment, and the market for remote work. Staff report no. 1061, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Organization design and firm heterogeneity: Toward an integrated research agenda for strategy. Joseph J, Baumann O, Burton R, Srikanth K, eds. Organization Design. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 40 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 229–254.Google Scholar
- (2020) Management practices and firm performance during the Great Recession. Evidence from Spanish survey data, https://events.bse.eu/live/files/2818-ricardgil66450pdf.Google Scholar
- (2023) Working from home and management controls. J. Bus. Econom. 93:193–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Work from home & productivity: Evidence from personnel & analytics data on IT professionals. Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (2019) The long-term effects of management and technology transfers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(1):121–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Investment and demand uncertainty. Quart. J. Econom. 114(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Dynamic managerial capabilities: A perspective on the relationship between managers, creativity, and innovation. Shalley CE, Hitt MA, Zhou J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press, New York), 421–430.Google Scholar
- (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
- (2021) Management practices and productivity in Japan: Evidence from six industries in JP MOPS. J. Jpn. Internat. Econom. 61:101152.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Personnel economics. Gibbons RS, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 469–519.Google Scholar
- (2020) A quantitative analysis of distortions in managerial forecasts. NBER Working Paper No. 26830, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembaka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
- (2016) Demand or productivity: What determines firm growth? RAND J. Econom. 47(3):608–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Entrepreneurial ecosystems during COVID-19: The survival of small businesses using dynamic capabilities. World J. Entrepreneurship Management Sustainable Development 17(3):457–476.Google Scholar
- (2016) Bankruptcy law and bank financing. J. Financial Econom. 120(2):363–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. J. Econometrics 235(2):2218–2244.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The IT revolution and southern Europe’s two lost decades. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 18(5):2441–2486.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) What determines productivity? J. Econom. Lit. 49(2):326–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar

