Sampling Bias in Entrepreneurial Experiments

References

• Bennett VM, Chatterji AK (2023) The entrepreneurial process: Evidence from a nationally representative survey. Strategic Management J. 44(1):86–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bojanowski P, Grave E, Joulin A, Mikolov T (2017) Enriching word vectors with subword information. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 5:135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2021) Promoting platform takeoff and self-fulfilling expectations: Field experimental evidence. Management Sci. 67(9):5953–5967.Link, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Messinese D, Novelli E, Paolucci E, Spina C (2021) A scientific approach to innovation management: Evidence from four field experiments. Working paper, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Cao R (2019) Information frictions in new venture finance: Evidence from product hunt rankings. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strateg. Manage. J. 40(3):331–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2019) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1994) Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Sci. 40(2):227–251.Link, Google Scholar
• Cowgill B, Tucker CE (2019) Economics, fairness and algorithmic bias. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Delecourt S, Fitzpatrick A (2021) Childcare matters: Female business owners and the baby-profit gap. Management Sci. 67(7):4455–4474.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T (2021) Why Startups Fail: A New Roadmap for Entrepreneurial Success (Currency, New York).Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Townsend RR (2020) Are early stage investors biased against women? J. Financial Econom. 135(3):653–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng J, Jaravel X (2019) Innovating for people like me: Evidence from female-founded consumer packaged goods startups. Working paper, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Wang SQ (2017) Diversity in innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 23082. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Mollick E (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta H (2022) Do female researchers increase female enrollment in clinical trials? Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk AO (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Li A (2019) Measuring founding strategy. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Ferguson JP, Koning R (2015) The lives and deaths of jobs: Technical interdependence and survival in a job structure. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1665–1681.Link, Google Scholar
• Hayek FA (1948) Individualism and Economic Order (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Hebert C (2019) Gender stereotypes and entrepreneur financing. Preprint, submitted January 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3318245.Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2016) Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell ST (2017) Learning from feedback: Evidence from new ventures. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Howell ST, Nanda R (2019) Networking frictions in venture capital, and the gender gap in entrepreneurship. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 1–56.Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2014) Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(3):25–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S, Sunstein CR (2020) Algorithms as discrimination detectors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(48):30096–30100.Google Scholar
• Koenecke A, Nam A, Lake E, Nudell J, Quartey M, Mengesha Z, Toups C, Rickford JR, Jurafsky D, Goel S (2020) Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(14):7684–7689.Google Scholar
• Koning R, Model J (2013) Experimental study of crowdfunding cascades: When nothing is better than something. Preprint, submitted August 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3155428.Google Scholar
• Koning R, Hasan S, Chatterji A (2022) Experimentation and startup performance: Evidence from A/B testing. Management Sci. 68(9):6434–6453.Link, Google Scholar
• Koning R, Samila S, Ferguson JP (2020) Inventor gender and the direction of invention. AEA Papers and Proceedings, vol. 110, 250–254.Google Scholar
• Koning R, Samila S, Ferguson JP (2021) Who do we invent for? Patents by women focus more on women’s health, but few women get to invent. Science 372(6548):1345–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski AC, Taddy M, Evans JA (2019) The geometry of culture: Analyzing the meanings of class through word embeddings. Am. Sociol. Rev. 84(5):905–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuppuswamy V, Younkin P (2020) Testing the theory of consumer discrimination as an explanation for the lack of minority hiring in Hollywood films. Management Sci. 66(3):1227–1247.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2017) Mendel in the C-Suite: Design and the evolution of strategies. Strategy Sci. 2(4):282–287.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo H, Zhang L (2021) Gender orientation and segregation of ideas: Metoo’s impact in Hollywood. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Michelman V, Msall L (2022) Sex, drugs, and R&D: Missing innovation from regulating female enrollment in clinical trials. Working paper, Brown University, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G (1991) Crossing the Chasm (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Moretti E (2011) Social learning and peer effects in consumption: Evidence from movie sales. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):356–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S (2019) Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366(6464):447–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Roche M, Oettl A, Catalini C (2020) Entrepreneurs (co-) working in close proximity: Impacts on technology adoption and startup performance outcomes.Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott EL, Shu P (2017) Gender gap in high-growth ventures: Evidence from a university venture mentoring program. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):308–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Goldberg A, Manian VG, Potts C (2018) Enculturation trajectories: Language, cultural adaptation, and individual outcomes in organizations. Management Sci. 64(3):1348–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Starr E, Goldfarb B (2020) Binned scatterplots: A simple tool to make research easier and better. Strategic Management J. 41(12):2261–2274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tak E, Correll SJ, Soule SA (2019) Gender inequality in product markets: When and how status beliefs transfer to products. Soc. Forces 98(2):548–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Truffa F, Wong A (2022) Undergraduate gender diversity and direction of scientific research. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Link, Google Scholar