Asymmetric Naïveté: Beliefs About Self-Control

References

• Acland D, Levy MR (2015) Naiveté, projection bias, and habit formation in gym attendance. Management Sci. 61(1):146–160.Link, Google Scholar
• Ambuehl S, Bernheim BD, Ockenfels A (2021) What motivates paternalism? An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):787–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutstrom EE (2008) Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76(3):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Callen M, Khan MY, Jaffar K, Sprenger C (2023) Using preference estimates to customize incentives: An application to polio vaccination drives in Pakistan. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 21(4):1428–1477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Wertenbroch K (2002) Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psych. Sci. 13(3):219–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N (2009) Spousal control and intra-household decision making: An experimental study in the Philippines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1245–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augenblick N, Rabin M (2019) An experiment on time preference and misprediction in unpleasant tasks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(3):941–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augenblick N, Niederle M, Sprenger C (2015) Working over time: Dynamic inconsistency in real effort tasks. Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1067–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A (2017) Bayesian markets to elicit private information. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(30):7958–7962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigenho J, Martinez S (2023) Social comparisons in peer effects. Working paper, University of California San Diego, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Bisin A, Hyndman K (2020) Present-bias, procrastination and deadlines in a field experiment. Games Econom. Behav. 119:339–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breig Z, Gibson M, Shrader J (2020) Why do we procrastinate? Present bias and optimism. Working paper, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
• Buehler R, Griffin D, Ross M (1994) Exploring the ‘planning fallacy’: Why people underestimate their task completion times. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(3):366–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Coffman LC (2012) The schooling decision: Family preferences, intergenerational conflict, and moral hazard in the Brazilian favelas. J. Polit. Econom. 120(3):359–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadena X, Cristea A, Delgado-Medrano H, Schoar A (2011) Fighting procrastination in the workplace: An experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 16944, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Chen R, Chen Y, Liu Y, Mei Q (2017) Does team competition increase pro-social lending? Evidence from online microfinance. Games Econom. Behav. 101:311–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian B (2011) $100 bills on the sidewalk: Suboptimal investment in 401(k) plans. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(3):748–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danz D, Madarász K, Wang SW (2018) The biases of others: Projection equilibrium in an agency setting. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2004) Contract design and self-control: Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):353–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2006) Paying not to go to the gym. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):694–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Paserman MD (2005) Job search and impatience. J. Labor Econom. 23(3):527–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Oliveira ACM, Jacobson S (2021) (Im)patience by proxy: Making intertemporal decisions for others. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 182:83–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger J, Gilovich T, Ross L (2005) Peering into the bias blind spot: People’s assessments of bias in themselves and others. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 31(5):680–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahn M, Hakenes H (2019) Teamwork as a self-disciplining device. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 11(4):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fedyk A (2015) Overcoming overconfidence: Teamwork and self-control. Working paper, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Landry P (2016) Procrastination in teams. NBER Working Paper No. 21891, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2003) The W effect of incentives. Working paper, University of California San Diego, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Gottlieb D (2008) Competition over time-inconsistent consumers. J. Public Econom. Theory 10(4):673–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green J, Stokey N (1983) A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Polit. Econom. 91(3):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidhues P, Kőszegi B (2010) Exploiting naïveté about self-control in the credit market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(5):2279–2303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidhues P, Kőszegi B, Strack P (2018) Unrealistic expectations and misguided learning. Econometrica 86(4):1159–1214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herweg F, Müller D (2011) Performance of procrastinators: On the value of deadlines. Theory Decision 70(3):329–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai T, Rutter TA, Camerer CF (2021) Meta-analysis of present-bias estimation using convex time budgets. Econom. J. 131(636):1788–1814.Google Scholar
• Imas A, Sadoff S, Samek A (2017) Do people anticipate loss aversion? Management Sci. 63(5):1271–1284.Link, Google Scholar
• Iriberri N, Rey-Biel P (2013) Elicited beliefs and social information in modified dictator games: What do dictators believe other dictators do? Quant. Econom. 4(3):515–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaufmann M (2022) Projection bias in effort choices. Games Econom. Behav. 135:368–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Hyperbolic discounting and golden eggs. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (2018) Private paternalism, the commitment puzzle, and model-free equilibrium. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108:1–21.Google Scholar
• Laibson D, Repetto A, Tobacman J (1998) Self-control and saving for retirement. Brookings Pap. Econom. Activity 1:91–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E, Rosen S (1981) Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Moore D, Weber R (2006) Misperceiving the value of information in predicting the performance of others. Experiment. Econom. 9(3):281–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2003) Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1209–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ludwig S, Nafziger J (2011) Beliefs about overconfidence. Theory Decision 70(4):475–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madarász K (2012) Information projection: Model and applications. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(3):961–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClure SM, Laibson D, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306(5695):503–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 104–142.Google Scholar
• Meier S, Sprenger C (2010) Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(1):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller N, Resnick P, Zeckhauser R (2005) Eliciting informative feedback: The peer-prediction method. Management Sci. 51(9):1359–1373.Link, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999a) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999b) Incentives for procrastinators. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):769–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2006) Optimal sin taxes. J. Public Econom. 90(10–11):1825–1849.Google Scholar
• Pronin E, Lin DY, Ross L (2002) The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28(3):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, van Leeuwen B (1998) Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(2):189–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scopelliti I, Morewedge CK, McCormick E, Min HL, Lebrecht S, Kassam KS (2015) Bias blind spot: Structure, measurement, and consequences. Management Sci. 61(10):2468–2486.Link, Google Scholar
• Skiba P, Tobacman J (2009) Payday loans, uncertainty and discounting: Explaining patterns of borrowing, repayment, and default. NBER Working Paper No. 14659, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Strack P, Taubinsky D (2021) Dynamic preference ‘reversals’ and time inconsistency. NBER Working Paper No. w28961, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Svenson O (1981) Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psych. 47(2):143–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q (2010) Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):557–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Loewenstein G (2003) Social projection of transient drive states. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(9):1159–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Dunning D, Loewenstein G (2000) Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(1):66–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West RF, Meserve RJ, Stanovich KE (2012) Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 103(3):506–519.Crossref, Google Scholar