Stars in Their Constellations: Great Person or Great Team?

References

• Abowd JM , Kramarz F , Margolis DN (1999) High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica 67(2):251–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abowd JM , McKinney KL , Schmutte JM (2019) Modeling endogenous mobility in earnings determination. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(3):405–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams JD , Black GC , Clemmons JR , Stephan PE (2005) Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Res. Policy 34(3):259–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal AK , McHale J , Oettl A (2017) How stars matter: Recruiting and peer effects in evolutionary biology. Res. Policy 47:853–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadpoor M , Jones B (2019) Decoding team and individual impact in science and invention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(28):13885–13890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD , Stewart JA (1974) Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 39(August):596–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P , Kinsler J , Price J (2017) Productivity spillovers in team production: Evidence from professional basketball. J. Labor Econom. 35(1):191–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P , Stuart T , Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P , Zivin JSG , Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1973) A theory of marriage: Part I. J. Political Econom. 81(4):813–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J , Feldman M (2011) The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography. Res. Policy 40(1):81–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J , Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskarabhatla A , Cabral L , Hegde D , Peeters T (2021) Are inventors or firms the engines of innovation? Management Sci. 67(6):3899–3920.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M , Murray F , Gans JS (2015) Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Sci. 61(7):1473–1495.Link, Google Scholar
• Black I (2019) Better Together? CEO Identity and Firm Productivity (Duke University).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borjas GJ , Duran KB (2015) Which peers matter? The relative impacts of collaborators, colleagues, and competitors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(5):1104–1117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger A , Stuart G (1996) Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 5:5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C , Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):306–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell B , Di Lorenzo F , Tartari V (2021) Employer-employee matching and complementary assets: The role of cross-organization collaborations. Acad. Management J. 64(3):799–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatain O (2011) Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Strategic Management J. 32(1):76–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatain O , Mindruta D (2017) Estimating value creation from revealed preferences: Application to value-based strategies. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1964–1985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM , Sauermann H , Stephan P (2020) Not in the job description: The commercial activities of academic scientist and engineers. Management Sci. 66(9):4108–4117.Link, Google Scholar
• Cole JR , Cole S (1973) Social Stratification in Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti A , Liu CC (2015) Bringing the laboratory back in: Personnel composition and scientific output at the MIT Department of Biology. Res. Policy 44(9):1633–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN , Kiesler S (2005) Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35(5):703–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P , David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Vany A , Walls D (1999) Uncertainty in the movies: Can star power reduce the terror of the box office? J. Cultural Econom. 23:285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberse A (2007) The power of stars: Do star actors drive the success of movies? J. Marketing 71(4):102–120.Google Scholar
• Elfenbein D , Zenger T (2017) Creating and capturing value in repeated exchange relationships: The second paradox of embeddedness. Organ. Sci. 28(5):894–914.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L , Mingo S , Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox JT (2018) Estimating matching games with transfers. Quant. Econom. 9(1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox JT (2010) Identification in matching games. Quant. Econom. 1(2):203–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS , Ryall MD (2017) Value capture theory: A strategic management review. Strategic Management J. 38:17–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B , Lee LE (2008) The effect of colleague quality on top performance: The case of security analysts. J. Organ. Behav. 29:1123–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B , Lee LE , Nanda A (2008) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Sci. 54(7):1213–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Guimera R , Uzzi B , Spiro J , Amaral L , Nunes A (2005) Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308(5722):697–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeussler C , Sauermann H (2013) Credit where credit is due? The impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship. Res. Policy 42(3):688–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MJ , Stephan PE , Thursby JG (2011) Conveying quality and value in emerging industries: Star scientists and the role of signals in biotechnology. Res. Policy 40(4):605–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huckman R , Pisano G (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52(4):473–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Jarosiewicz VE , Ross DG (2023) Revisiting managerial “style”: The replicability and falsifiability of manager fixed effects for firm policies. Strategic Management J. 44(3):858–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen R , Thursby JG , Thursby MC (2003) The disclosure and licensing of university inventions: Doing the best we can with the S**t we get to work with. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 21(9):1271–1300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ , Jones B , Feng Lu S , Uzzi B (2019) The reverse Matthew effect: Consequences of retraction in scientific teams. Rev. Econom. Statist. 101(3):492–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the death of the renaissance man: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2011) As science evolves, how can science policy? Lerner J , Stern S , eds. NBER Innovation Policy and the Economy 11 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 103–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF , Wutchy S , Uzzi B (2008) Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science 322(5905):1259–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz R (1982) The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27:81–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer M (1993) The O-ring theory of economic development. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):551–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E , Shaw K , Stanton C (2015) The value of bosses. J. Labor Econom. 33(4):823–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerchenmuller M , Sorenson O (2018) The gender gap in early career transitions in the life sciences. Res. Policy 47(6):1007–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin SG , Stephan PE (1991) Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(1):114–132.Google Scholar
• MacDonald G , Ryall MD (2004) How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. 50(10):1319–1333.Link, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew Effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mindruta D , Moeen M , Agarwal R (2016) A two-sided matching approach for partner selection and assessing complementarities in partners’ attributes in inter-firm alliances. Strategic Management J. 37(1):206–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2012) People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1001–1015.Google Scholar
• Montez J , Ruiz-Aliseda F , Ryall M (2018) Competitive intensity and its two-sided effect on the boundaries of firm performance. Management Sci. 64(6):2716–2733.Link, Google Scholar
• Obloj T , Capron L (2011) Role of resource gap and value appropriation: Effect of reputation gap on price premium in online auctions. Strategic Management J. 32(4):447–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J , Phillips D (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Industrial Corporate Change 5(2):453–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF , Wade JB , Fischer HM , Brown J , Kanfer A , Bowker G (2004) Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams. Res. Policy 33(4):661–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R , Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12:502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R , Argote L , Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Roach M , Sauermann H (2010) A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Res. Policy 39(3):422–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross DG (2018) Using cooperative game theory to contribute to strategy research. Strategic Management J. 39(11):2859–2876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F , Hess A (2007) Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effect. Organ. Sci. 18(6):898–921.Link, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H , Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapley LS , Shubik M (1971) The assignment game I: The core. Internat. J. Game Theory 1(1):111–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS , Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonin BL (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 20(7):595–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J , Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Stern I , Dukerich JM , Zajac E (2014) Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 35(4):512–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A , Greve HR (2006) Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. 49(4):723–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tervio M (2008) The difference that CEOs make: An assignment model approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):642–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tijssen RJW (2010) Discarding the ‘basic science/applied science’ dichotomy: A knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 61(9):1842–1852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldinger F (2012) Peer effects in science: Evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(2):838–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S , Jones BF , Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in the production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR , Lawrence BS (1989) Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Acad. Management J. 32(2):353–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L , Darby M (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(23):12709–12716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L , Darby M , Armstrong J (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG , Darby MR , Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar