Evaluating the Effect of Soda Taxes Using a Dynamic Model of Rational Addiction

References

• Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D (2019a) Regressive sin taxes, with an application to the optimal soda tax. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1557–1626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D (2019b) Should we tax sugar-sweetened beverages? An overview of theory and evidence. J. Econom. Perspect. 33(3):202–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avena NM, Rada P, Hoebel BG (2008) Evidence for sugar addiction: Behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Rev. 32(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badenes-Plá N, Jones AM (2003) Addictive goods and taxes: A survey from an economic perspective. Hacienda Pública Española 167(4):123–153.Google Scholar
• Baltagi BH (2007) On the use of panel data methods to estimate rational addiction models. Scottish J. Political Econom. 54(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltagi BH, Griffin JM (2001) The econometrics of rational addiction: The case of cigarettes. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 19(4):449–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltagi BH, Griffin JM (2002) Rational addiction to alcohol: Panel data analysis of liquor consumption. Health Econom. 11(6):485–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Grossman M, Murphy KM (1994) An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(3):396–418.Google Scholar
• Bernstein GA, Carroll ME, Thuras PD, Cosgrove KP, Roth ME (2002) Caffeine dependence in teenagers. Drug Alcohol Dependence 66(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Sexton SE (2023) Local excise taxes, sticky prices, and spillovers: Evidence from Berkeley’s soda tax. Quant. Marketing Econom. 21(2):281–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Kruger MW, Mela CF (2008) Database paper—The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. 27(4):745–748.Link, Google Scholar
• Brownell KD, Frieden TR (2009) Ounces of prevention—The public policy case for taxes on sugared beverages. New England J. Medicine 360(18):1805–1808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brownell KD, Farley T, Willett WC, Popkin BM, Chaloupka FJ, Thompson JW, Ludwig DS (2009) The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. New England J. Medicine 361(16):1599–1605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Frisvold DE (2017) The pass-through of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to retail prices: The case of Berkeley, California. J. Policy Anal. Management 36(2):303–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C (2012) The medical care costs of obesity: An instrumental variables approach. J. Health Econom. 31(1):219–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaloupka F (1991) Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. J. Political Econom. 99(4):722–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Rao VR (2020) A dynamic model of rational addiction with stockpiling and learning: An empirical examination of e-cigarettes. Management Sci. 66(12):5886–5905.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Goetz D (2024) Consumption responses to an unpopular policy: Evidence from a short-lived soda tax. Marketing Sci. 43(6):1204–1225.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Osborne M (2020) Identification and estimation of forward-looking behavior: The case of consumer stockpiling. Marketing Sci. 39(4):707–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Imai S, Ishihara M, Jain N (2012) A practitioner’s guide to Bayesian estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(2):151–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMeglio DP, Mattes RD (2000) Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: Effects on food intake and body weight. Internat. J. Obesity 24(6):794–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dragone D, Raggi D (2021) Resolving the milk addiction paradox. J. Health Econom. 77:102452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P (2004) Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. 23(1):66–81.Link, Google Scholar
• Elster J (1979) Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Imai S, Keane MP (2003) Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(1):5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falbe J, Rojas N, Grummon AH, Madsen KA (2015) Higher retail prices of sugar-sweetened beverages 3 months after implementation of an excise tax in Berkeley, California. Amer. J. Public Health 105(11):2194–2201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, McCulloch CE, Madsen KA (2016) Impact of the Berkeley excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Amer. J. Public Health 106(10):1865–1871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein EA, Brown DS (2006) Why does the private sector underinvest in obesity prevention and treatment? North Carolina Medical J. 67(4):310–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gearhardt AN, Corbin WR, Brownell KD (2009) Food addiction: An examination of the diagnostic criteria for dependence. J. Addiction Medicine 3(1):1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Sun B (2015) A dynamic model of rational addiction: Evaluating cigarette taxes. Marketing Sci. 34(3):452–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman M, Chaloupka FJ (1998) The demand for cocaine by young adults: A rational addiction approach. J. Health Econom. 17(4):427–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman M, Chaloupka FJ, Sirtalan I (1998) An empirical analysis of alcohol addiction: Results from the Monitoring the Future panels. Econom. Inquiry 36(1):39–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruber J, Köszegi B (2001) Is addiction “rational”? Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1261–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Nair HS (2010) Retail competition and the dynamics of demand for tied goods. Marketing Sci. 29(2):366–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2003) The post-promotion dip puzzle: What do the data have to say? Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(4):409–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2006a) Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica 74(6):1637–1673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2006b) Sales and consumer inventory. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):543–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu FB, Malik VS (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: Epidemiologic evidence. Physiology Behav. 100(1):47–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hussam RN, Rabbani A, Reggiani G, Rigol N (2017) Habit formation and rational addiction: A field experiment in handwashing. Harvard Business School Working Paper Series No. 18-030, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Ifland JR, Preuss HG, Marcus MT, Rourke KM, Taylor WC, Burau K, Jacobs WS, Kadish W, Manso G (2009) Refined food addiction: A classic substance use disorder. Medical Hypotheses 72(5):518–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai S, Jain N, Ching AT (2009) Bayesian estimation of dynamic discrete choice models. Econometrica 77(6):1865–1899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishihara M, Ching AT (2016) Bayesian estimation of finite-horizon discrete choice dynamic programming models. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Jacobson MF, Brownell KD (2000) Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health. Amer. J. Public Health 90(6):854–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson PM, Kenny PJ (2010) Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. Nature Neuroscience 13(5):635–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan R, Misra K, Singh V (2016) Will a fat tax work? Marketing Sci. 35(1):10–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim DD, Basu A (2016) Estimating the medical care costs of obesity in the United States: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and empirical analysis. Value Health 19(5):602–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Lee C, Gupta S (2020) Bayesian synthetic control methods. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):831–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Erdem T, Ishihara M (2023) Counter-cyclical price promotion: Capturing seasonal changes in stockpiling and endogenous consumption. Quant. Marketing Econom. 21(4):437–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon HE, So H, Han SP, Oh W (2016) Excessive dependence on mobile social apps: A rational addiction perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):919–939.Link, Google Scholar
• Lachenmeier DW, Wegert K, Kuballa T, Schneider R, Ruge W, Reusch H, Alexy U, Kersting M, Winkler G (2013) Caffeine intake from beverages in German children, adolescents, and adults. J. Caffeine Res. 3(1):47–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laporte A, Dass AR, Ferguson BS (2017) Is the rational addiction model inherently impossible to estimate? J. Health Econom. 54:161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine J (2023) Are menthol cigarettes more addictive? A cross-category comparison of habit formation. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
• Liu X, Lopez R (2012) Evidence of rational addiction to carbonated soft drinks? China Agricultural Econom. Rev. 4(3):300–317.Google Scholar
• Liu X, Derdenger T, Sun B (2018) An empirical analysis of consumer purchase behavior of base products and add-ons given compatibility constraints. Marketing Sci. 37(4):569–591.Link, Google Scholar
• Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB (2006) Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: A systematic review. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition 84(2):274–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després J-P, Willett WC, Hu FB (2010) Sugar sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 33(11):2477–2483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures (2019) Sugary drink taxes. Natl. Conf. State Legislatures (Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Nguyen M, Jarvis SE, Tinajero MG, Yu J, Chiavaroli L, Mejia SB, Khan TA, et al. (2023) Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and weight gain in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition 117(1):160–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NHANES (2023) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2021–2023 Data Documentation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/.Google Scholar
• Olekalns N, Bardsley P (1996) Rational addiction to caffeine: An analysis of coffee consumption. J. Political Econom. 104(5):1100–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborne M (2018) Frequency versus depth: How changing the temporal process of promotions impacts demand for a storable good. Japanese Econom. Rev. 69(3):258–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riddell LJ, Sayompark D, Oliver P, Keast RSJ (2012) Caffeine as an ingredient in sugar sweetened beverages. Preedy VR, ed. Caffeine: Chemistry, Analysis, Function and Effects (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK), 22–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rojas C, Wang E (2021) Do taxes on soda and sugary drinks work? Scanner data evidence from Berkeley and Washington State. Econom. Inquiry 59(1):95–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RJ, Morton J, Brethauer S, Mattar S, De Maria E, Benz JK, Titus J, Sterrett D (2017) Obesity in America. Surgery Obesity Related Diseases 13(10):1643–1650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• San Francisco Office of the Treasurer and Tax Collector (2018) Sugar-sweetened beverage tax ordinance implementation guidelines. City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. https://sftreasurer.org/business/taxes-fees/sugary-drinks-tax#collapse-accordion-2124-1.Google Scholar
• Seiler S, Tuchman A, Yao S (2021) The impact of soda taxes: Pass-through, tax avoidance, and nutritional effects. J. Marketing Res. 58(1):22–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver LD, Ng SW, Ryan-Ibarra S, Smith Taillie L, Induni M, Miles DR, Poti JM, Popkin BM (2017) Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. PLoS Medicine 14(4):e1002283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ, Becker GS (1977) De gustibus non est disputandum. Amer. Econom. Rev. 67(2):76–90.Google Scholar
• Strain EC, Mumford GK, Silverman K, Griffiths RR (1994) Caffeine dependence syndrome: Evidence from case histories and experimental evaluations. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 272(13):1043–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun B (2005) Promotion effect on endogenous consumption. Marketing Sci. 24(3):430–443.Link, Google Scholar
• U.S. Tax Policy Center (2024) How do state and local soda taxes work? Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Washington, DC. https://taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-do-state-and-local-soda-taxes-work.Google Scholar
• Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD (2007) Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Amer. J. Public Health 97(4):667–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang EY (2015) The impact of soda taxes on consumer welfare: Implications of storability and taste heterogeneity. RAND J. Econom. 46(2):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang YC, Pamplin J, Long MW, Ward ZJ, Gortmaker SL, Andreyeva T (2015) Severe obesity in adults cost state Medicaid programs nearly $8 billion in 2013. Health Affairs 34(11):1923–1931.Google Scholar
• Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Long MW, Gortmaker SL (2021) Association of body mass index with health care expenditures in the United States by age and sex. PLoS One 16(3):e0247307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization) (1992) Expert Committee on Drug Dependence: Nineteenth Report. WHO Technical Report Series No. 836, Geneva.Google Scholar
• Winston GC (1980) Addiction and backsliding: A theory of compulsive consumption. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(4):295–324.Crossref, Google Scholar