Moral Support and Performance
Published Online:14 Sep 2023https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.02906
References
- AFA—FIFA - Informe Clubes Fútbol (2019). Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
- (2014) The brain correlates of the effects of monetary and verbal rewards on intrinsic motivation. Front. Neurosci. 8:1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Psychological pressure in competitive environments: Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(5):2548–2564.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Walking the walk: Portraits in leadership for family engagement in urban schools. School Community J. 19(1):9–32.Google Scholar
- (1986) The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 4(3):359–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 9(3):75–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(1):87.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) How do shocks to non-cognitive skills affect test scores? Ann. Econ. Stat. 107/108:155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English Premiership football. J. Sports Sci. 25(11):1185–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) The returns to scarce talent: Footedness and player remuneration in European soccer. J. Sports Econom. 14(6):606–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Causal effects of an absent crowd on performances and refereeing decisions during COVID-19. Econom. Lett. 198:109664.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J. Hum. Resour. 50(2):317–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron’s (1992) conceptual framework a decade later. J. Sports Sci. 23(4):395–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Do fans impact sports outcomes? A COVID-19 natural experiment. J. Sports Econom. 24(1):3–27.Google Scholar
- (2020) Animal spirits in the beautiful game. Testing social pressure in professional football during the COVID-19 lockdown. Unpublished manuscript. Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. https://osf.io/hczkj/.Google Scholar
- (2011) The economics of parenting, self-esteem and academic performance: Theory and a test. Economica 78(310):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Pledging, praising and shaming: Experimental labour markets in Ghana. IZA Discussion Paper, Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 18(1):105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) No home bias in ghost games. Discussion Paper, Institute for Organisational Economics, Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2016) Referee bias. J. Econom. Surv. 30(4):679–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Home-bias in referee decisions: Evidence from “ghost matches” during the COVID-19 pandemic. Econom. Lett. 197(2):109621.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Is there psychological pressure in competitive environments? J. Econom. Psychol. 39:249–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Team performance and audience: Experimental evidence from the football sector. Technical report, European Commission Joint Research Centre and Ispra, Ispra Italy.Google Scholar
- (2021) Does crowd support drive the home advantage in professional football? Evidence from German ghost games during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Sports Econom. 22(8):982–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Talent and/or popularity: What does it take to be a superstar? Econom. Inquiry 50(1):202–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surv. 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Crisis? What crisis? Football in Germany. J. Sports Econom. 7(1):60–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Favoritism under social pressure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 87(2):208–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4):191–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Reduced home advantage for basketball teams from capital cities in Europe. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 11(2):143–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Google Scholar
- (2005) Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk for school failure? Child Dev. 76(5):949–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44:223–270.Google Scholar
- (2021) Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments–evidence from a natural field experiment. Games Econom. Behav. 126:278–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Coaching for Commitment: Interpersonal Strategies for Obtaining Superior Performance from Individuals and Teams, 2nd ed. (Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco), 158.Google Scholar
- (2012) Psychological pressure in competitive environments: New evidence from randomized natural experiments. Management Sci. 58(8):1585–1591.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Home advantage in professional tennis. J. Sports Sci. 29(1):19–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The formation of prosociality: Causal evidence on the role of social environment. J. Political Econom. 128(2):434–467.Google Scholar
- (2018) Midweek effect on soccer performance: Evidence from the German Bundesliga. Econom. Inquiry 56(1):193–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) An analysis of National Hockey League face-offs: Implications for the home advantage. Internat. J. Sport Exercise Psychol. 9(2):102–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Student coaching: How far can technology go? J. Hum. Resour. 53(2):299–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Beautiful Game Theory: How Soccer Can Help Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2018) Testing the wisdom of crowds in the field: Transfermarkt valuations and international soccer results. Internat. J. Forecast. 34(1):17–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Seasonal home advantage in English professional football; 1974–2018. Economist 169(1):107–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Behavior under social pressure: Empty Italian stadiums and referee bias. Econom. Lett. 108(2):212–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Home advantage in soccer: Variations in its magnitude and a literature review of the inter-related factors associated with its existence. J. Sport Behav. 29(2):169.Google Scholar
- (2013) Singin’in the rain: A study of social pressure on the soccer field. CESifo Working Paper, No. 4481, Munich.Google Scholar
- (2022) Eliminating supportive crowds reduces referee bias. Econom. Inquiry 60(3):1416–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Social pressure in the stadiums: Do agents change behavior without crowd support? J. Econom. Psychol. 82:102344.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Emotional support from parents early in life, aging, and health. Psychol. Aging 19(1):4.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The sound of silence in association football: Home advantage and referee bias decrease in matches played without spectators. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 21(12):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 124(2):240.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Favoritism of agents-the case of referees’ home bias’. J. Econom. Psychol. 25(4):461–469.Crossref, Google Scholar

