Conflicted Analysts and Initial Coin Offerings
References
- (2018) Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings. J. Econom. Bus. 100:64–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The role of ‘expert reviewers’ in private capital markets. ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, Working Paper No. 739/2021, Brussels.Google Scholar
- (2008) Do analyst conflicts matter? Evidence from stock recommendations. J. Law Econom. 51(3):503–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Are blockchain crowdsales the new ‘gold rush’? Success determinants of initial coin offerings. Working paper, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
- (2023) Biased auctioneers. J. Finance 78(2):795–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts and credit rating. J. Financial Econom. 91(1):83–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Ratings quality and borrowing choice. J. Finance 74(5):2619–2665.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Do local analysts know more? A cross-country study of the performance of local analysts and foreign analysts. J. Financial Econom. 88(3):581–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Non-rating revenue and conflicts of interest. J. Financial Econom. 127(1):94–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Assessing credit rating agencies by bond issuers and institutional investors. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 29(9–10):1367–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Overcoming the coordination problem in new marketplaces via cryptographic tokens. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1368–1385.Google Scholar
- (2013) Ratings quality over the business cycle. J. Financial Econom. 108(1):62–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Digital tulips? Returns to investors in initial coin offerings. J. Corporate Finance 66:101786.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The blockchain folk theorem. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):1662–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Capital market effects of media synthesis and dissemination: Evidence from robo-journalism. Rev. Accounting Stud. 23(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Hyperbole or reality? Investor response to extreme language in earnings conference calls. Accounting Rev. 95(2):31–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The credit ratings game. J. Finance 67(1):85–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) New blockchain intermediaries: Do ICO rating websites do their job well? J. Alternative Investments 21(4):67–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The role of disclosure and information intermediaries in an unregulated capital market: Evidence from initial coin offerings. J. Accounting Res. 60(1):129–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Before an analyst becomes an analyst: Does industry experience matter? J. Finance 72(2):751–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Financial analysts and their contribution to well-functioning capital markets. Foundations Trends Accounting 11(3):119–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Skin in the game: Personal stock holdings and investors’ response to stock analysis on social media. Rev. Accounting Stud. 24(C):731–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Machine intelligence vs. human judgement in new venture finance. Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2019) ICO success drivers: A textual and statistical analysis. J. Alternative Investments 21(4):13–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Signaling to the crowd: Private quality information and rewards-based crowdfunding. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(1):155–169.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Analysts’ conflicts of interest and biases in earnings forecasts. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 42(4):893–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Wisdom of crowds: The value of stock opinions transmitted through social media. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(5):1367–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) A theory of ICOs: Diversification, agency, and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 67(10):5969–5989.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Product market competition with crypto tokens and smart contracts. J. Financial Econom. 149(1):73–91.Google Scholar
- (2022) Platform tokenization: Financing, governance, and moral hazard. Management Sci. 68(9):6411–6433.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Competition and strategic incentives in the market for credit ratings: Empirics of the financial crisis of 2007. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3514–3555.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Casting conference calls. Management Sci. 66(11):5015–5039.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):1754–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Tokenomics: Dynamic adoption and valuation. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(3):1105–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Token-based platform finance. J. Financial Econom. 144(3):972–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Blockchain and the economics of crypto-tokens and initial coin offerings. Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers No. 17-00008, Nashville.Google Scholar
- (2012) Analyst initiations of coverage and stock return synchronicity. Accounting Rev. 87(5):1527–1553.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Harnessing the wisdom of crowds. Management Sci. 66(5):1847–1867.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) De-crypto-ing signals in initial coin offerings: Evidence of rational token retention. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print January 6, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4631.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) The first analyst coverage of neglected stocks. Financial Management 39(2):555–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Decrypting coin winners: Disclosure quality, governance mechanism and team networks. Working paper, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
- (2002) Differences of opinion and the cross section of stock returns. J. Finance 57(5):2113–2141.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Initial coin offerings hyped and dehyped: An empirical examination. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
- (2017) The internet as an information intermediary. Rev. Accounting Stud. 22(2):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees. J. Financial Econom. 134(1):91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Different sides of the same story: Investors? And issuers? Views of rating agencies. J. Fixed Income 7(4):35–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Ernst & Young (2018) Initial coin offerings (ICOs): The class of 2017—One year later. EY study, London.Google Scholar
- (2021) ICO investors. Financial Markets Portfolio Management 35:1–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The cross-section of non-professional analyst skill. Working paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
- (2019) Initial coin offerings, blockchain technology, and white paper disclosures. Working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
- (2019) Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 34(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Institutional investors and post-ICO performance: An empirical analysis of investor returns in initial coin offerings (ICOs). J. Corporate Finance 64:101679.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Motives and profiles of ICO investors. J. Bus. Res. 125:564–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Experts or charlatans? ICO analysts and white paper informativeness. J. Banking Finance 139:106476.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Initial coin offerings, speculation, and asset tokenization. Management Sci. 67(2):914–931.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) The impact of governance signals on ICO fundraising success. J. Indust. Bus. Econom. 46(2):283–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Utility tokens as a commitment to competition. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- (2021) Optimal financing with tokens. J. Financial Econom. 142(3):1038–1067.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1952) The Technique of Clear Writing (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- (2022) Bitcoin’s limited adoption problem. J. Financial Econom. 144(2):347–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Credit rating dynamics and competition. J. Bank. Finance 49:100–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Initial coin offerings: Financing growth with cryptocurrency token sales. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(9):3925–3974.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Cryptocurrencies: Stylized facts on a new investible instrument. Financial Management 48(4):1049–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Evidence on the information content of text in analyst reports. Accounting Rev. 89(6):2151–2180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The value of crowdsourced earnings forecasts. J. Accounting Res. 54(4):1077–1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Conflicts of interest and stock recommendations: The effects of the global settlement and related regulations. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(10):4189–4217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The job rating game: Revolving doors and analyst incentives. J. Financial Econom. 135(1):41–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Is there a quid pro quo between hedge funds and sell-side equity analysts? J. Portfolio Management 45(6):117–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Financial gatekeepers and investor protection: Evidence from criminal background checks. J. Accounting Res. 57(2):491–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Consumers as financiers: Consumer surplus, crowdfunding, and initial coin offerings. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(3):1105–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The wisdom of crowds in fintech: Evidence from initial coin offerings. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 11(1):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Initial coin offerings and platform building. Working paper, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.Google Scholar
- (2021) Initial coin offering: Current research and future directions. Rau R, Wardrop R, Zingales L, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Technological Finance (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 369–393.Google Scholar
- (1998) Underwriting relationships, analysts’ earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. 25(1):101–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Moody’s and S&P ratings: Are they equivalent? Conservative ratings and split rated bond yields. J. Money Credit Banking 42(7):1267–1293.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) When is a liability not a liability? J. Finance 66(1):35–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Textual analysis in finance. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 12:357–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The revolving door of sell-side analysts. Accounting Rev. 94(1):249–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Initial coin offering (ICO) success and post-ICO performance. Management Sci. 68(12):8658–8679.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Tokenomics: When tokens beat equity. Working paper, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
- (2007) Are small investors naive about incentives? J. Financial Econom. 85(2):457–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Does the scope of the sell-side analyst industry matter? An examination of bias, accuracy, and information content of analyst reports. J. Finance 72(3):1285–1334.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Rev. Financial Stud. 12(4):653–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Is there life after the complete loss of analyst coverage? Accounting Rev. 88(2):667–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Analyst impartiality and investment banking relationships. J. Accounting Res. 43(4):623–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
- PwC (2019) 5th ICO/STO report. PwC study.Google Scholar
- (2020) What determines success in initial coin offerings? Venture Capital 22(2):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Read me if you can! An analysis of ICO white papers. Finance Res. Lett. 38:101427.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The real effects of debt certification: Evidence from the introduction of bank loan ratings. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(4):1659–1691.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Herding among security analysts. J. Financial Econom. 58(3):369–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The ICO gold rush: It’s a scam, it’s a bubble, it’s a super challenge for regulators. Harvard Internat. Law J. 60(2):267–315.Google Scholar
- (2019) Readability of token white paper and ICO first-day return. Econom. Lett. 180:58–61.Crossref, Google Scholar

