The Impact of Peer Performance and Relative Rank on Managerial Career Attainment: Evidence from College Students

References

• Becker GS (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. NBER Books, 1st ed. (National Bureau of Economic Research, distributed by Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bertoni M, Nisticò R (2023) Ordinal rank and the structure of ability peer effects. J. Public Econom. 217:104797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beugnot J, Fortin B, Lacroix G, Villeval MC (2019) Gender and peer effects on performance in social networks. Eur. Econom. Rev. 113:207–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond T, Bulman G, Li X, Smith J (2018) Updating human capital decisions: Evidence from SAT score shocks and college applications. J. Labor Econom. 36(3):807–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booij AS, Leuven E, Oosterbeek H (2017) Ability peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(2):547–578.Google Scholar
• Brune L, Chyn E, Kerwin J (2022) Peers and motivation at work. J. Human Resources 57(4):1147–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Jensen R (2015) How does peer pressure affect educational investments? Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1329–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo MD, Titiunik R (2014) Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82(6):2295–2326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Fullerton RL, West JE (2009) Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. J. Labor Econom. 27(3):439–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2008) Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(6):1479–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier A, Gibbons S, Thorpe A, Snell M, Hoskins S (2009) Students’ academic self-perception. Econom. Ed. Rev. 28(6):716–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cicala S, Fryer RG, Spenkuch JL (2017) Self-selection and comparative advantage in social interactions. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 16(4):983–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper KM, Krieg A, Brownell SE (2018) Who perceives they are smarter? Exploring the influence of student characteristics on student academic self-concept in physiology. Adv. Physiol. Ed. 42(2):200–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta U, Mani S, Sharma S, Singhal S (2020) Effects of peers and rank on cognition, preferences, and personality. Rev. Econom. Statist. 104:587–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JA (1966) The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. Amer. J. Sociol. 72(1):17–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denning JT, Murphy R, Weinhardt F (2023) Class rank and long-run outcomes. Rev. Econom. Statist. 105(6):1426–1441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Soule WT (1988) Gender and promotion in segmented job ladder systems. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 53(1):26–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Dupas P, Kremer M (2011) Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1739–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsner B, Isphording IE (2017) A big fish in a small pond: Ability rank and human capital investment. J. Labor Econom. 35(3):787–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsner B, Isphording IE (2018) Rank, sex, drugs, and crime. J. Human Resources 53(2):356–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsner B, Isphording IE, Zölitz U (2021) Achievement rank affects performance and major choices in college. Econom. J. (Lond.) 131(640):3182–3206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabregas R (2023) Trade-offs of attending better schools: Achievement, self-perceptions and educational trajectories. Econom. J. (Lond.) 133(655):2709–2737.Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I (2009) Cumulative gender disadvantage in contract employment. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(4):871–923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiedler FE (1986) The contribution of cognitive resources and leader behavior to organizational performance. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 16(6):532–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons TW, Callan VJ, Paulsen N (2014) Gender disparity in the C-suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top? Leadersh. Quart. 25(2):245–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M (2000) Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (2000) Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations 53(8):1027–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn J, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W (2001) Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69(1):201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn Y, Islam A, Patacchini E, Zenou Y (2019) Friendship and female education: Evidence from a field experiment in Bangladeshi primary schools. Econom. J. (Lond.) 130(627):740–764.Google Scholar
• Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Markman JM, Rivkin SG (2003) Does peer ability affect student achievement? J. Appl. Econometrics 18(5):527–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman M, Tadelis S (2021) People management skills, employee attrition, and manager rewards: An empirical analysis. J. Political Econom. 129(1):243–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hultin M, Szulkin R (1999) Wages and unequal access to organizational power: An empirical test of gender discrimination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):453–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. J. Econometrics 142(2):615–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson JO, Mood C (2008) Choice by contrast in Swedish schools: How peers’ achievement affects educational choice. Soc. Forces 87(2):741–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt MW (2002) Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):765–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Cable DM, Boudreau JW, Bretz RD Jr (1995) An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Person. Psych. 48(3):485–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komives SR (2011) College student leadership identity development. Murphy SE, Reichard R, eds. Early Development and Leadership: Building the Next Generation of Leaders (Routledge, New York), 273–292.Google Scholar
• Li W-D, Arvey RD, Song Z (2011) The influence of general mental ability, self-esteem and family socioeconomic status on leadership role occupancy and leader advancement: The moderating role of gender. Leadersh. Quart. 22(3):520–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindenlaub I, Prummer A (2020) Network structure and performance. Econom. J. (Lond.) 131(634):851–898.Google Scholar
• Marmaros D, Sacerdote B (2002) Peer and social networks in job search. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(4):870–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Parker JW (1984) Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(1):213–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrary J (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. J. Econometrics 142(2):698–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW (1970) High school effects on college intentions. Amer. J. Sociol. 76(1):59–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy R, Weinhardt F (2020) Top of the class: The importance of ordinal rank. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(6):2777–2826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Sørensen JB (2010) Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(7):1116–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson JI (1972) High school context and college plans: The impact of social structure on aspirations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(2):143–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Offermann LR, Thomas KR, Lanzo LA, Smith LN (2020) Achieving leadership and success: A 28-year follow-up of college women leaders. Leadersh. Quart. 31(4):101345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagani L, Comi S, Origo F (2021) The effect of school rank on personality traits. J. Human Resources 56(4):1187–1225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ribas RP, Sampaio B, Trevisan G (2020) Short- and long-term effects of class assignment: Evidence from a flagship university in Brazil. Labour Econom. 64(101835):1–13.Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spilerman S, Lunde T (1991) Features of educational attainment and job promotion prospects. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(3):689–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tartari V, Perkmann M, Salter A (2014) In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Res. Policy 43(7):1189–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tincani MM (2017) Heterogeneous peer effects and rank concerns: Theory and evidence. CESifo Working Paper 6331, CESifo, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Useem M, Karabel J (1986) Pathways to top corporate management. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):184–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wise DA (1975) Personal attributes, job performance, and probability of promotion. Econometrica 43(5/6):913–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Chawla NV, Uzzi B (2019) A network’s gender composition and communication pattern predict women’s leadership success. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(6):2033–2038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zarate RA (2023) Uncovering peer effects in social and academic skills. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 15(3):35–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman DJ (2003) Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(1):9–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman SD (2019) Elite colleges and upward mobility to top jobs and top incomes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar