The Value of Regulators as Monitors: Evidence from Banking

References

• Agarwal S, Lucca D, Seru A, Trebbi F (2014) Inconsistent regulators: Evidence from banking. Quart. J. Econom. 129:889–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arner DW, Barberis J, Buckey RP (2016) FinTech, RegTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern J. Internat. Law Bus. 37:371.Google Scholar
• Barltrop CJ, Sheng A (1992) Developing off-site surveillance systems for banking. World Bank Technical Papers Series in Finance; No. 1/92, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Barth JR, Lin C, Ma Y, Seade J, Song FM (2013) Do bank regulation, supervision and monitoring enhance or impede bank efficiency? J. Banking Finance 37:2879–2892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty A, Liao S (2014) Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. J. Accounting Econom. 58:339–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty AL, Ke B, Petroni KR (2002) Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. Accounting Rev. 77:547–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Davies SM (1998) The information content of bank examinations. J. Financial Services Res. 14:117–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Davies SM, Flannery MJ (2000) Comparing market and supervisory assessments of bank performance: Who knows what when? J. Money Credit Banking 32:641–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111:1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer A, Cohen DA, Lys TZ, Walther BR (2010) The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. J. Accounting Econom. 50:296–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonfim D, Cerqueiro G, Degryse H, Ongena S (2022) On-site inspecting zombie lending. Management Sci. 69:2547–2567.Link, Google Scholar
• Broeders D, Prenio J (2018) Innovative technology in financial supervision (suptech) – The experience of early users. BIS Financial Stability Institute Insights on Policy Implementation; No. 9/18, Financial Stability Institute/Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo MD, Titiunik R (2014) Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82:2295–2326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell TS, Kracaw WA (1980) Information production, market signalling, and the theory of financial intermediation. J. Finance 35:863–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole RA, Gunther JW (1998) Predicting bank failures: A comparison of on-and off-site monitoring systems. J. Financial Services Res. 13:103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles JL, Lemmon ML, Meschke JF (2012) Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance: The link between managerial ownership and corporate performance. J. Financial Econom. 103:149–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dang TV, Gorton G, Holmström B, Ordonez G (2017) Banks as secret keepers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107:1005–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delis MD, Staikouras PK, Tsoumas C (2016) Formal enforcement actions and bank behavior. Management Sci. 63:959–987.Link, Google Scholar
• Diamond DW (1989) Reputation acquisition in debt markets. J. Political Econom. 97:828–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond DW (1991) Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. J. Political Econom. 99:689–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falato A, Kadyrzhanova D, Lel U (2014) Distracted directors: Does board busyness hurt shareholder value? J. Financial Econom. 113:404–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan J, Gijbels I (1996) Local Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 66 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Ferreira MA, Matos P (2008) The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. J. Financial Econom. 88:499–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FFIEC (2017) Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act (EGRPRA) Joint Report to Congress (Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
• Flannery MJ, Houston JF (1999) The value of a government monitor for US banking firms. J. Money Credit Banking 31:14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flannery MJ, Kwan SH, Nimalendran M (2004) Market evidence on the opaqueness of banking firms’ assets. J. Financial Econom. 71:419–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flannery MJ, Kwan SH, Nimalendran M (2013) The 2007–2009 financial crisis and bank opaqueness. J. Financial Intermed. 22:55–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gale D, Hellwig M (1985) Incentive-compatible debt contracts: The one-period problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 52:647–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert RA, Meyer AP, Vaughan MD (1999) The role of supervisory screens and econometric models in off-site surveillance. Rev. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis 81:31.Google Scholar
• Gilbert RA, Meyer AP, Vaughan MD (2002) Could a CAMELS downgrade model improve off-site surveillance? Rev. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis 84(1):47–63.Google Scholar
• Goetz MR, Laeven L, Levine R (2016) Does the geographic expansion of banks reduce risk? J. Financial Econom. 120:346–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith-Pinkham PS, Hirtle B, Lucca DO (2016) Parsing the Content of Bank Supervision (Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report, New York).Google Scholar
• Gopalan Y, Kalda A, Manela A (2017) Hub-and-spoke regulation and bank leverage. Preprint, submitted July 15, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2849877.Google Scholar
• Granja J, Leuz C (2017) The death of a regulator: Strict supervision, bank lending and business activity. NBER Working Paper No. 24168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Healy PM, Wahlen JM (1999) A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horiz. 13:365–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Himmelberg CP, Hubbard RG, Palia D (1999) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. J. Financial Econom. 53:353–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirtle B, Kovner A, Plosser M (2020) The impact of supervision on bank performance. J. Finance 75:2765–2808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskins SM, Labonte M (2015) An analysis of the regulatory burden on small banks. CRS report, Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T (2010) Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statist. Sci. 25(1):51–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Levine R, Lin C (2016) Competition and bank opacity. Rev. Financial Stud. 29:1911–1942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin L, Myers SC (2006) R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. J. Financial Econom. 79:257–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson S, La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2000) Tunneling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90:22–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn C, Winton A (1998) Ownership structure, speculation, and shareholder intervention. J. Finance 53:99–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanagaretnam K, Lim CY, Lobo GJ (2014) Effects of international institutional factors on earnings quality of banks. J. Banking Finance 39:87–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandrac J, Schlusche B (2021) The effect of bank supervision and examination on risk taking: Evidence from a natural experiment. Rev. Financial Stud. 34:3181–3212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempf E, Manconi A, Spalt O (2016) Distracted shareholders and corporate actions. Rev. Financial Stud. 30:1660–1695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J-B, Zhang L (2014) Financial reporting opacity and expected crash risk: Evidence from implied volatility smirks. Contemp. Accounting Res. 31:851–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiser EK, Prager RA, Scott J (2012) Supervisor Ratings and the Contraction of Bank Lending to Small Businesses (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Warner JB (2007) Econometrics of event studies. Espen Eckbo B, ed. Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance (Elsevier, San Diego), 3–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laeven L, Levine R (2007) Is there a diversification discount in financial conglomerates? J. Financial Econom. 85:331–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Nanda D, Wysocki PD (2003) Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. J. Financial Econom. 69:505–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyon JD, Barber BM, Tsai C-L (1999) Improved methods for tests of long-run abnormal stock returns. J. Finance 54:165–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maug E (1998) Large shareholders as monitors: Is there a trade-off between liquidity and control? J. Finance 53:65–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell JJ, Servaes H (1990) Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. J. Financial Econom. 27:595–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrary J (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. J. Econometrics 142:698–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minton BA, Stulz RM, Taboada AG (2019) Are the largest banks valued more highly? Rev. Financial Stud. 32:4604–4652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mnuchin ST, Philips CS (2017) A financial system that creates economic opportunities. Bank and Credit Unions. Report to President Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of the Treasury.Google Scholar
• Morgan D (2002) Rating banks: Risk and uncertainty in an opaque industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92:874–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Passalacqua A, Angelini P, Lotti F, Soggia G (2021) The real effects of bank supervision: Evidence from on-site bank inspections. Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No. 1349, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
• Peek J, Rosengren E (1995) Bank regulation and the credit crunch. J. Banking Finance 19:679–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pogach J, Unal H (2019) The dark-side of banks’ nonbank business: Internal dividends in bank holding companies. FDIC Center for Financial Research Paper No. 2018-01, FDIC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Quarles RK (2018) Implementation of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. Testimony Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Rezende M, Wu J (2014) The effects of supervision on bank performance: Evidence from discontinuous examination frequencies. Working paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Sahajwala R, Van Den Bergh P (2000) Supervisory risk assessment and early warning system. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Working Papers, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Schmidt C, Fahlenbrach R (2017) Do exogenous changes in passive institutional ownership affect corporate governance and firm value? J. Financial Econom. 124:285–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1986) Large shareholders and corporate control. J. Political Econom. 94:461–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastav A, Vallascas F (2022) Small business lending and regulation for small banks. Management Sci. 68:7742–7760.Link, Google Scholar
• Swindle CS (1995) Using CAMEL ratings to evaluate regulator effectiveness at commercial banks. J. Financial Services Res. 9:123–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tepalagul N, Lin L (2015) Auditor independence and audit quality: A literature review. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 30:101–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend RM (1979) Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J. Econom. Theory 21:265–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Greuning H, Brajovic Bratanovic S (2009) Analyzing Banking Risk: A Framework for Assessing Corporate Governance and Financial Risk (The World Bank, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson K, Veuger S (2017) Information frictions in uncertain regulatory environments: Evidence from us commercial banks. Oxf. Bull. Econom. Statist. 79:205–233.Crossref, Google Scholar