Behavioral Market Design for Online Gaming Platforms

References

• Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson A, Green EA (2018) Personal bests as reference points. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(8):1772–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Pope D (2011) Can losing lead to winning? Management Sci. 57(5):817–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertoni M, Brunello G, Rocco L (2015) Selection and the age–productivity profile. Evidence from chess players. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 110:45–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun PA, Constantinides GM, Ferson WE (1993) Time nonseparability in aggregate consumption: International evidence. Eur. Econom. Rev. 37(5):897–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne M, Bray E, Maclean E, Johnston A (2020) Evidence for win-stay-lose-shift in puppies and adult dogs. Working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
• Cai X, Gong J, Lu Y, Zhong S (2018) Recover overnight? Work interruption and worker productivity. Management Sci. 64(8):3489–3500.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Dahl GB (2011) Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):103–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cerulli-Harms A, Goette L, Sprenger C (2019) Randomizing endowments: An experimental study of rational expectations and reference-dependent preferences. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 11(1):185–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Tang F-F (1998) Learning and incentive-compatible mechanisms for public goods provision: An experimental study. J. Political Econom. 106(3):633–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conrad K (2004) Probability distributions and maximum entropy. Entropy 6(452):10.Google Scholar
• Cotla CR (2015) Learning in repeated public goods games—A meta analysis. Preprint, submitted September 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241779.Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Meng J (2011) New York City cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational-expectations targets for hours and income. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1912–1932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2018) Structural behavioral economics. Bernheim BD, DellaVigna S, Laibson D, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 613–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Sousa J, Hollard G (2023) From micro to macro gender differences: Evidence from field tournaments. Management Sci. 69(6):3358–3399.Link, Google Scholar
• De Sousa J, Niederle M (2022) Trickle-down effects of affirmative action: A case study in France. NBER working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Dragone D, Ziebarth NR (2017) Non-separable time preferences, novelty consumption and body weight: Theory and evidence from the East German transition to capitalism. J. Health Econom. 51:41–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, Gerdes C, Gränsmark P (2013a) Beauty queens and battling knights: Risk taking and attractiveness in chess. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 90:1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, Gerdes C, Gränsmark P, Little AC (2013b) Facial masculinity predicts risk and time preferences in expert chess players. Appl. Econom. Lett. 20(16):1477–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Roth AE (1998) Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):848–881.Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2005) Is tomorrow another day? The labor supply of New York City cabdrivers. J. Political Econom. 113(1):46–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2015) Why you can’t find a taxi in the rain and other labor supply lessons from cab drivers. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1975–2026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frechette GR, Lizzeri A, Salz T (2019) Frictions in a competitive, regulated market: Evidence from taxis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(8):2954–2992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerdes C, Gränsmark P (2010) Strategic behavior across gender: A comparison of female and male expert chess players. Labour Econom. 17(5):766–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gränsmark P (2012) Masters of our time: Impatience and self-control in high-level chess games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 82(1):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haenni S (2019) Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter? On the demotivational effect of losing in repeated competitions. Games Econom. Behav. 115:346–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Stahl DO (2012) Between-game rule learning in dissimilar symmetric normal-form games. Games Econom. Behav. 74(1):208–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotz VJ, Miller RA (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linnemer L, Visser M (2016) Self-selection in tournaments: The case of chess players. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 126:213–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A (2006) Pay, reference points, and police performance. Quart. J. Econom. 121(3):783–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller JB, Sanjurjo A (2018) Surprised by the hot hand fallacy? A truth in the law of small numbers. Econometrica 86(6):2019–2047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgul EF, Ozbay K (2015) Revisiting labor supply of New York City taxi drivers: Empirical evidence from large-scale taxi data. Transportation Res. Board 94th Annual Meeting, vol. 15 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC), 1–19.Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Schweitzer ME (2011) Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):129–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posch M (1999) Win–stay, lose–shift strategies for repeated games—Memory length, aspiration levels and noise. J. Theoret. Biol. 198(2):183–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post T, Van den Assem MJ, Baltussen G, Thaler RH (2008) Deal or no deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):38–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Erev I (1995) Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econom. Behav. 8(1):164–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Masuda N (2015) Win-stay lose-shift strategy in formation changes in football. EPJ Data Sci. 4:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thakral N, Tô LT (2021) Daily labor supply and adaptive reference points. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(8):2417–2443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turnovsky SJ, Monteiro G (2007) Consumption externalities, production externalities, and efficient capital accumulation under time non-separable preferences. Eur. Econom. Rev. 51(2):479–504.Crossref, Google Scholar