Following the Customers: Dynamic Competitive Repositioning

References

• Armstrong G, Kotler P (2009) Marketing: An Introduction (Pearson).Google Scholar
• Anderson EW, Shugan SM (1991) Repositioning for changing preferences: The case of beef versus poultry. J. Consumer Res. 18(2):219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari A, Economides N, Steckel J (1998) The max-min-min principle of product differentiation. J. Regulatory Sci. 38(2):207–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avery J, Gupta S (2014) Marketing reading: Brand positioning. Gupta S, ed. Core Curriculum Readings Series (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Berry ST, Waldfogel J (2001) Do mergers increase product variety? Evidence from radio broadcasting. Quart. J. Econom. 116(3):1009–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonatti A, Cisternas G, Toikka J (2017) Dynamic oligopoly with incomplete information. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84:503–546.Google Scholar
• Budd C, Harris C, Vickers J (1993) A model of the evolution of duopoly: Does the asymmetry between firms tend to increase or decrease? Rev. Econom. Stud. 60:543–573.Google Scholar
• Cabral LMB, Riordan M (1994) The learning curve, market dominance, and predatory pricing. Econometrica 62(5):1115–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• d’Aspremont C, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse JF (1979) On Hotelling’s stability in competition. Econometrica 47(5):1145–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit A (1993) The Art of Smooth Pasting (Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Erickson R, Pakes A (1995) Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62:53–82.Google Scholar
• Gardete P (2016) Competing with asymmetric information: The case of DRAM manufacturing. Management Sci. 62(11):3291–3309.Link, Google Scholar
• George L (2007) What’s fit to print: The effect of ownership concentration on product variety in daily newspaper markets. Inform. Econom. Policy 19(3-4):285–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Zhang J (2012) Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Sci. 31(6):995–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Harris C, Vickers J (1987) Racing with uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54:1–21.Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1973) Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points. Internat. J. Game Theory 2:1–23.Google Scholar
• Hauser JR (1988) Competitive price and positioning strategies. Marketing Sci. 7:76 –91.Google Scholar
• Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econom. J. (London) 39(153):41–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irmen A, Thisse JF (1998) Competition in multi-characteristics space: Hotelling was almost right. J. Econom. Theory 78:76–102.Google Scholar
• Jeziorski P (2014) Estimation of cost synergies from mergers: Application to the U.S. radio. RAND J. Econom. 45:816–846.Google Scholar
• Ke TT, Shin J, Yu J (2020) A theory of brand positioning: product-portfolio view. Working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong and Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Kuksov D (2004) Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. 23(4):490–499.Link, Google Scholar
• Lauga DO, Ofek E (2011) Product positioning in a two-dimensional vertical differentiation model: The role of quality costs. Marketing Sci. 30:903–923.Google Scholar
• Magill MJP, Constantinides GM (1976) Portfolio selection with transaction costs. J. Econom. Theory 13:245–263.Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1988) Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 7:141–168.Google Scholar
• Ofek E, Sarvary M (2003) R&D, marketing, and the success of next-generation products. Marketing Sci. 22:355–370.Google Scholar
• Sayman S, Hoch SJ, Raju JS (2002) Positioning of store brands. Marketing Sci. 21:378–397.Google Scholar
• Scarf H (1959) The optimality of (S,s) policies in the dynamic inventory problem. Arrow K, Karlin S, Suppes P, eds. Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences (Stanford University Press, Standford, CA), 196–202.Google Scholar
• Selove M (2014) How do firms become different? A dynamic model. Management Sci. 60(4):980–989.Link, Google Scholar
• Shen Q (2014) A dynamic model of entry and exit in a growing industry. Marketing Sci. 33(5):712–724.Link, Google Scholar
• Sheshinski E, Weiss Y (1983) Optimum pricing policy under stochastic inflation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 50(3):513–529.Google Scholar
• Sweeting A (2010) The effects of mergers on product positioning: Evidence from the music radio industry. RAND J. Econom. 41(2):372–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeting A (2013) Dynamic product positioning in differentiated product markets: The effect of fees for musical performance rights on the commercial radio industry. Econometrica 81:1763–1803.Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch M, Weinberg C (1995) Product and price competition in a two dimensional vertical differentiation model. Marketing Sci. 14(2):224–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (1992) Dynamic duopolies with non-convex adjustment costs. Econom. Lett. 39:391–394.Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (2018) A dynamic model of repositioning. Marketing Sci. 37(2):279–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1989) From critical resources to corporate strategy. J. General Management 14:4–12.Google Scholar
• Wischhover C (2017), Axe leaves behind its legacy of sexism by tackling toxic masculinity. Racked.com. Accessed August 23, 2020, https://www.racked.com/2017/6/28/15874802/axe-rebranding-toxic-masculinity.Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2016) Deadlines in product development. Management Sci. 62(11):3310–3326.Link, Google Scholar