Scandal, Social Movement, and Change: Evidence from #MeToo in Hollywood

References

• Abraham M (2020) Gender-role incongruity and audience-based gender bias: An examination of networking among entrepreneurs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):151–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adut A (2005) A theory of scandal: Victorians, homosexuality, and the fall of Oscar Wilde. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):213–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amenta E (2006) When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amenta E, Caren N, Chiarello E, Su Y (2010) The political consequences of social movements. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:287–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, King AA (2008) Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1150–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchflower DG, Levine PB, Zimmerman DJ (2003) Discrimination in the small-business credit market. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):930–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botelho T, Abraham M (2017) Pursuing quality: How search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double standards in a multistage evaluation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):698–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Chin M, Hambrick D (2014) CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1786–1809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Greenwood B (2018) Managers’ political ideology and gender inequality among subordinates: Does his ideology matter more than hers? Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):287–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Ridgeway CL, Zuckerman EW, Jank S, Jordan-Bloch S, Nakagawa S (2017) It’s the conventional thought that counts: How third-order inference produces status advantage. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devers CE, Dewett T, Mishina Y, Belsito CA (2009) A general theory of organizational stigma. Organ. Sci. 20(1):154–171.Link, Google Scholar
• Devine PG, Monteith MJ, Zuwerink JR, Elliot AJ (1991) Prejudice with and without compunction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 60(6):817–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickert S, Slovic P (2009) Attentional mechanisms in the generation of sympathy. Judgment Decision Making 4(4):297–306.Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Kalev A (2017) Training programs and reporting systems won’t end sexual harassment. Promoting more women will. Harvard Bus. Rev. (November 15), https://hbr.org/2017/11/training-programs-and-reporting-systems-wont-end-sexual-harassment-promoting-more-women-will.Google Scholar
• Doosje B, Branscombe NR, Spears R, Manstead ASR (1998) Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(4):872–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg N (2000) Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Rev. Psych. 51:665–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ (1994) The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):203–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Kaplan S (2018) Gender and organization science: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1229–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2012) Corporate social responsibility and shareholderreaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Management J. 56(3):758–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Luo H (2020) Risk-mitigating technologies: The case of radiation diagnostic devices. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 5, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3634.Link, Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Wang SQ (2017a) And the children shall lead: Gender diversity and performance in venture capital. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 17-103, Boston.Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Wang SQ (2017b) Diversity in innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 23082, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Goodwin J, Jasper JM, Polletta F (2001) Why emotions matter. Goodwin J, Jasper JM, Polletta F, eds. Politics: Emotions and Social Movements (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk A (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48:1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haidt J (2003) The moral emotions. Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH, eds. Handbook of Affective Sciences, Series in Affective Science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom), 852–870.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1983) Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Res. Organ. Behav. 5:269–298.Google Scholar
• Howell ST, Nanda R (2019) Networking frictions in venture capital, and the gender gap in entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Working Paper No. 19–105.Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):56–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Yue LQ, Rao H (2010) Trouble in store: Probes, protests, and store openings by Wal-Mart, 1998-2007. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(1):53–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaspers K (1947) The Question of German Guilt (Fordham University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Jennings J, Brush C (2013) Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):663–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(1):97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Greve HR, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):195–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Conley MA, Okimoto TG, Phillips DJ, Merluzzi J (2020) Evidence that investors penalize female founders for lack of industry fit. Science 6(48):eabd7664.Google Scholar
• King BG (2008) A political mediation model ofcorporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy R, Mattsson M (2019) The effects of social movements: Evidence from #MeToo. Working paper, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).Google Scholar
• Lins KV, Roth L, Servaes H, Tamay A (2019) Does corporate culture add value? Evidence from the Harvey Weinstein scandal and the #MeToo movement. Working paper, University of Utah.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Small DA (2007) The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Rev. General Psych. 11(2):112–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo H (2014) When to sell your idea: Theory and evidence from the movie industry. Management Sci. 60(12):3067–3086.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo H, Macher J, Wahlen M (2021) Judgment aggregation in creative production: Evidence from the movie industry. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print February 9, https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3815.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyons E, Zhang L (2017) The impact of entrepreneurship programs on minorities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):303–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons E, Zhang L (2018) Who does (not) benefit from entrepreneurship programs? Strategic Management J. 39(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn M, Davis G (2006) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdam D (1996) Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. McCarthy JD, McAdam D, Zald MN, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom), 23–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(6):1212–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, Cobb JA (2020) Take a stand or keep your seat: Board turnover after social movement boycotts. Acad. Management J. 63(4):1028–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, Werner T (2016) Blacklisted businesses: Shifts in social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):584–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, King BG, Soule SA (2015) A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(3):654–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, Odziemkowska K, Pontikes E (2021) Bad company: Shifts in social activists’ tactics and resources after industry scandals. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print January 26, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1410.Link, Google Scholar
• McGinn K, Milkman K (2013) Looking up and looking out: Career mobility effects of demographic similarity among professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1041–1060.Link, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2018) How social media users have discussed sexual harassment since MeToo went viral. Accessed March 21, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/11/.Google Scholar
• Pontikes E, Negro G, Rao H (2010) Stained red: A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the “red scare” in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharkey A (2014) Categories and organizational status: The role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(5):1380–1433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SL, Choueiti M, Pieper K, Yao K, Case A, Choi A (2020) Inequality in 1,200 popular films: Examining portrayals of gender, race/ethnicity, LGBTQ & disability from 2007 to 2018. Technical report, USC Annenberg InclusionInitiative, University of Southern California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
• Tangney J, Dearing R (2002) Gender differences in morality. Bornstein RF, Masling JM, eds. The Psychodynamics of Gender and Gender Role, Empirical Studies in Psychoanalytic Theories, vol. 10. (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 251–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarrow S (1998) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne J-P (2012) Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed-methods study of the global arms industry, 1996-2007. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1027–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yue L, Rao H, Ingram P (2013) Informational spillovers from protests against corporations: A tale of Walmart and Target. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(4):669–701.Crossref, Google Scholar