Quantile Connectedness: Modeling Tail Behavior in the Topology of Financial Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.3984

References

  • Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2015) Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):564–608.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acemoglu D, Carvalho VM, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2012) The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 80(5):1977–2016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acharya VV, Drechsler I, Schnabl P (2014) A Pyrrhic victory? Bank bailouts and sovereign credit risk. J. Finance 69(6):2689–2739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adrian T, Brunnermeier MK (2016) CoVaR. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(7):1705–1741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adrian T, Crump RK, Moench E (2013) Pricing the term structure with linear regressions. J. Financial Econom. 110(1):110–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldasoro I, Ehlers T (2018) The credit default swap market: What a difference a decade makes. BIS Quart. Rev. June:1–14.Google Scholar
  • Allen L, Bali TG, Tang Y (2012) Does systemic risk in the financial sector predict future economic downturns? Rev. Financial Stud. 25(10):3000–3036.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alter A, Beyer A (2014) The dynamics of spillover effects during the European sovereign debt Turmoil. J. Bank. Finance 42:134–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ando T, Bai J (2020) Quantile co-movement in financial markets: A panel quantile model with unobserved heterogeneity. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 115(529):266–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang A, Bekaert G (2002) International asset allocation with regime shifts. Rev. Financial Stud. 15(4):1137–1187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang A, Longstaff FA (2013) Systemic sovereign credit risk: Lessons from the U.S. and Europe. J. Monetary Econom. 60(5):493–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bai J, Ng S (2002) Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models. Econometrica 70(1):191–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bai J, Ng S (2013) Principal components estimation and identification of static factors. J. Econometrics 176(1):18–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bai J, Wei S-J (2017) Property rights gaps and CDS spreads: When is there a strong transfer risk from the sovereigns to the corporates? Quart. J. Finance 7(4):1750013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bai J, Li K, Lu L (2016) Estimation and inference of FAVAR models. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 34(4):620–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bali TG, Weinbaum D (2007) A conditional extreme value volatility estimator based on high-frequency returns. J. Econom. Dynamic Control 31(2):361–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baruník J, Kočenda E, Vácha L (2016) Asymmetric connectedness on the U.S. stock market: Bad and good volatility spillovers. J. Financial Markets 27:55–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bekaert G, Hoerova M (2014) The VIX, the variance premium and stock market volatility. J. Econometrics 183(2):181–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Betz F, Hautsch N, Peltonen TA, Schienle M (2016) Systemic risk spillovers in the European banking and sovereign network. J. Financial Stability 25:206–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billio M, Getmansky M, Lo A, Pelizzon L (2012) Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. J. Financial Econom. 104(3):535–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blanchard OJ, Quah D (1989) The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(4):655–673.Google Scholar
  • Blanchard OJ, Watson MW (1986) Are all business cycles alike? Gordon RJ, ed. The American Business Cycle (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 123–160.Google Scholar
  • Blanco R, Brennan S, Marsh IW (2005) An empirical analysis of the dynamic relationship between investment-grade bonds and credit default swaps. J. Finance 60(5):2255–2281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollerslev T, Tauchen G, Zhou H (2009) Expected stock returns and variance risk premia. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(11):4463–4492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bostanci G, Yilmaz K (2020) How connected is the global sovereign credit risk network? J. Banking Finance 113:105761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caporin M, Pelizzon L, Ravazzolo F, Rigobon R (2018) Measuring sovereign contagion in Europe. J. Financial Stability 34:150–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cecchetti SG, Li H (2008) Measuring the impact of asset price booms using quantile vector autoregressions. Working paper, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  • Chavleishvili S, Manganelli S (2017) Quantile impulse response functions. Working paper, Goethe University Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  • Claeys P, Vašíček B (2014) Measuring bilateral spillover and testing contagion on sovereign bond markets in Europe. J. Banking Finance 46:151–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corsi F (2009) A simple approximate long memory model of realized volatility. J. Financial Econom. 7(2):174–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demirer M, Diebold FX, Liu L, Yilmaz K (2018) Estimating global bank network connectedness. J. Appl. Econometrics 33(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dendramis Y, Kapetanios G, Tzavalis E (2015) Shifts in volatility driven by large stock market shocks. J. Econom. Dynamic Control 55:130–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2009) Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. Econom. J. (London) 119(534):158–171.Google Scholar
  • Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2014) On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. J. Econometrics 182(1):119–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dungey M, Harvey J, Volkov V (2019) The changing international network of sovereign debt and financial institutions. J. Internat. Financial Markets Institute Money 60:149–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farhi E, Tirole J (2018) Deadly embrace: Sovereign and financial balance sheets doom loops. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(3):1781–1823.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldhütter P, Nielsen MS (2012) Systematic and idiosyncratic default risk in synthetic credit markets. J. Financial Econom. 10(2):292–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fender I, Hayo B, Neuenkirch M (2012) Daily pricing of emerging market sovereign CDS before and during the global financial crisis. J. Banking Finance 36(10):2786–2794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fruchterman TMJ, Reingold EM (1991) Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software Practice Experience 21(11):1129–1164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X (2016) Power laws in economics: An introduction. J. Econom. Perspective 30(1):185–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garratt A, Lee K, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2006) Global and National Macroeconometric Modelling: A Long-Run Structural Approach (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood-Nimmo MJ, Huang J, Nguyen VH (2019) Financial sector bailouts, sovereign bailouts and the transfer of credit risk. J. Financial Markets 42:121–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood-Nimmo MJ, Nguyen VH, Rafferty B (2016) Risk and return spillovers among the G10 currencies. J. Financial Markets 31:43–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gyntelberg J, Hördahl P, Ters K, Urban J (2013) Intraday dynamics of euro area sovereign CDS and bonds. Working Paper 423, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • Heber G, Lunde A, Shephard N, Sheppard K (2009) Oxford-Man Institute’s Realized Library Data Set, Oxford-Man Institute (University of Oxford, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • International Monetary Fund (2013) Old risks, new challenges. Global Financial Stability Report, IMF, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Jorion P, Zhang G (2007) Good and bad credit contagion: Evidence from credit default swaps. J. Financial Econom. 84(3):860–883.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Juodis A, Reese S (2021) The incidental parameters problem in testing for remaining cross-section correlation. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. https://10.1080/07350015.2021.1906687.Google Scholar
  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koenker R, Hallock KF (2001) Quantile regression. J. Econom. Perspective 15(4):143–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koenker R, Xiao Z (2006) Quantile autoregression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 101(475):980–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linnemann L, Winkler R (2016) Estimating nonlinear effects of fiscal policy using quantile regression methods. Oxford Econom. Papers 68(4):1120–1145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Londono JM (2019) Bad bad contagion. J. Bank. Finance. 108:105652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longstaff FA, Pan J, Pedersen LH, Singleton KJ (2011) How sovereign is sovereign credit risk? Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 3(2):75–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mastromarco C, Serlenga L, Shin Y (2016) Modelling technical efficiency in cross sectionally dependent stochastic frontier panels. J. Appl. Econometrics 31(1):281–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNeil AJ, Frey R (2000) Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroskedastic financial time series: An extreme value approach. J. Empirical Finance 7(3–4):271–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pan J, Singleton KJ (2008) Default and recovery implicit in the term structure of sovereign CDS spreads. J. Finance 63(5):2345–2384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pesaran MH (2021) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empire Econom. 60:13–50.Google Scholar
  • Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Rev. 34(6–10):1089–1117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schüler YS (2014) Asymmetric effects of uncertainty over the business cycle: A quantile structural vector autoregressive approach. Working paper 2014-02, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Sims CA (1986) Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis? Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank Quart. Rev. 10(1):2–16.Google Scholar
  • Zellner A, Ando T (2010) A direct Monte Carlo approach for Bayesian analysis of the seemingly unrelated regression model. J. Econometrics 159(1):33–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu H, Su X, Guo Y, Ren Y (2016) The asymmetric effects of oil price shocks on the Chinese stock market: Evidence from a quantile impulse response perspective. Sustainability 8(8):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.