Honesty in the Digital Age

References

• Abeler J, Becker A, Falk A (2014) Representative evidence on lying costs. J. Public Econom. 113:96–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abeler J, Raymond C, Nosenzo D (2019) Preferences for truth-telling. Econometrica 87(4):1115–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2021) Robots and jobs: Evidence from US local labor markets. J. Political Econom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1997) Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica 65(5):1005–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Petrie R (2004) Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. J. Public Econom. 88(7-8):1605–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Araujo T (2018) Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Comput. Human Behav. 85:183–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econom. Perspect. 29(3):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Lett. 2(3):412–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C, Lev-On A (2007) Computer-mediated communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: An experimental analysis. Political Philos. Econom. 6(2):139–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blinder AS (1973) Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. J. Human Resources 8(4):436–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bock O, Baetge I, Nicklisch A (2014) hroot - Hamburg registration and organization online tool. Eur. Econom. Rev. 71:117–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Frey BS (1999) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):335–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Ellman M, Charness G (2016) Let’s talk: How communication affects contract design. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 14(4):943–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewster S (2016) Do Your Banking with a Chatbot. MIT Tech. Rev. (May 17), https://www.technologyreview.com/2016/05/17/160167/do-your-banking-with-a-chatbot/.Google Scholar
• Brosig J, Ockenfels A, Weinmann J (2003) The effect of communication media on cooperation. German Econom. Rev. 4(2):217–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucciol A, Piovesan M (2011) Luck or cheating? A field experiment on honesty with children. J. Econom. Psych. 32(1):73–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchan N, Johnson E, Croson R (2006) Let’s get personal: An international examination of the influence of communication, culture and social distance on other regarding preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60(3):373–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016) 24 percent of employed people did some or all of their work at home in 2015. U.S. Department of Labor: The Economics Daily (July 8), https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/24-percent-of-employed-people-did-some-or-all-of-their-work-at-home-in-2015.htm.Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Jensen R (2017) Social image and economic behavior in the field: Identifying, understanding and shaping social pressure. Annual Rev. Econom. 9:131–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Ferman B, Fiorin S, Kanz M, Rao G (2017) Status goods: Experimental evidence from platinum credit cards. Quart. J. Econom. 133(3):1561–1595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai W, Huang X, Wu S, Kou Y (2015) Dishonest behavior is not affected by an image of watching eyes. Evolution Human Behav. 36(2):110–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capraro V (2017) Does the truth come naturally? Time pressure increases honesty in one-shot deception games. Econom. Lett. 158:54–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74(6):1579–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U (2008) What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 68(1):29–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Haruvy E, Sonsino D (2007) Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(1):88–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cramton P, List JA, Ockenfels A (2020) Market design, human behavior, and management. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 9, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3659.Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Hendren N, Kline P, Saez E (2014) Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1553–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cingl L, Korbel V (2020) External validity of a laboratory measure of cheating: Evidence from Czech juvenile detention centers. Econom. Lett. 191:109094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Maréchal MA (2018) Laboratory measure of cheating predicts misbehavior at school. Econom. J. 128(65):2743–2754.Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Maréchal MA, Noll T (2015) Bad boys: How criminal identity salience affects rule violation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(4):1289–1308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Maréchal MA, Tannenbaum D, Zünd CL (2019) Civic honesty around the globe. Science 365(6448):70–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conrads J, Lotz S (2015) The effect of communication channels on dishonest behavior. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 58:88–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R, Dejong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):739–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corazzini L, Kube S, Maréchal MA, Nicolò A (2014) Elections and deceptions: An experimental study on the behavioral effects of democracy. Amer. J. Political Sci. 58(421):579–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford V (1998) A survey of experiments on communication via cheap talk. J. Econom. Theory 78(2):286–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Galeotti F, Villeval MC (2018) Cheating in the laboratory predicts fraud in the field. An experiment in public transportations. Management Sci. 64(3):1081–1100.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawkins R (2006) The God Delusion (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York).Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2017) Voting to tell others. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(1):143–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Dufwenberg MA (2018) Lies in disguise - a theoretical analysis of cheating. J. Econom. Theory 175:248–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Muren A (2006) Generosity, anonymity, gender. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 61(1):42–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Stremitzer A (2017) Promises and expectations. Games Econom. Behav. 106:161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2004) Promises, threats and fairness. Econom. J. 114(495):397–420.Google Scholar
• Ernest-Jones M, Nettle D, Bateson M (2011) Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: A field experiment. Evolution Human Behav. 32(3):172–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen T, Enke B, Huffman D, Sunde U (2018) Global evidence on economic preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 133(4):1645–1692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schneider F (2010) Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: Are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity? Proc. Royal. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277(1686):1315–1323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Föllmi-Heusi F (2013) Lies in disguise-an experimental study on cheating. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):525–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Schulz JF (2016) Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies. Nature 531(7595):496–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Laibson D, Scheinkmann J, Soutter C (2000) Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):811–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Kajackaite A, Sobel J (2018) Lying aversion and the size of the lie. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(2):419–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree BJK, Mcconnell MA, Mitchell T, Tromp T, Yariv L (2010) The 1/d law of giving. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 2(1):183–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gürerk Ö, Irlenbusch B, Rockenbach B (2006) The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312(5770):108–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haley KJ, Fessler DMT (2005) Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity an anonymous economic game. Evolution Human Behav. 26(3):245–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall S (2017) How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing The Insurance Industry. CIPR Newsletter 22, National Association of Insurance Commissioners & The Center for Insurance Policy and Research, Kansas City, MO. https://www.naic.org/cipr_newsletter_archive/vol22_ai.pdf.Google Scholar
• Hancock JT, Guillory J (2015) Deception with technology. Sunder SS, ed. The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (Wiley & Sons, New York), 270–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hancock J, Thom-Santelli J, Ritchie T (2004) Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior. In Dykstra-Erickson E, Tscheligi M, eds. Proc. 2004 Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 129–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanna R, Wang S-Y (2017) Dishonesty and selection into public service. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 9(3):262–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermann D, Ostermaier A (2018) Be Close to Me and I Will Be Honest. How Social Distance Influences Honesty. CEGE Discussion Paper No. 340. Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research, Góttingen, Germany. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/175269/1/1014833183.pdf.Google Scholar
• Heymann DC, Rey Biel P (2018) Social Distance in Deceptive Behavior: Experimental Evidence from Malawi. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
• Hoffman BE, Mccabe K, Smith VL (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):653–660.Google Scholar
• Hoffman G, Forlizzi J, Ayal S, Steinfeld A, Antanitis J, Hochman G, Hochendoner E, Finkenaur J (2015) Robot presence and human honesty: Experimental evidence. 10th ACM/IEEE Internat. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’15) (ACM), 181–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hortaçsu A, Syverson C (2015) The ongoing evolution of US retail: A format tug-of-war. J. Econom. Perspect. 29(4):89–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houdek P (2017) A perspective on research on dishonesty: Limited external validity due to the lack of possibility of self-selection in experimental designs. Frontiers Psych. 8(1566):1–6.Google Scholar
• Houser D, Vetter S, Winter J (2012) Fairness and cheating. Eur. Econom. Rev. 56(8):1645–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irlenbusch B, Villeval MC (2015) Behavioral ethics: How psychology influenced economics and how economics might inform psychology? Current Opinion Psych. 6:87–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac RM, Walker JM (1988) Communication and free-riding behavior: The voluntary contribution mechanism. Econom. Inquiry 26(4):585–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khalmetski K, Sliwka D (2019) Disguising lies—image concerns and partial lying in cheating games. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 11(4):79–10.Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) More work for nothing? Getting symbolic awards and worker. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 3(3):86–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kröll M, Rustagi D (2017) Reputation, honesty, and cheating in informal milk markets in India. SAFE working paper no. 134, SAFE Center, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Laudenbach C, Pirschel J, Siegel S (2018) Personal Communication in a Fintech World: Evidence from Loan Payments. Working paper, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Lohse T, Simon SA, Konrad KA (2018) Deception under time pressure: Conscious decision or a problem of awareness? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 146:31–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masterov DV, Mayer UF, Tadelis S (2015) Canary in the e-commerce coal mine: Detecting and predicting poor experiences using buyer-to-seller messages. EC 2015 – Proc. 2015 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 81–94.Google Scholar
• Mateyka BPJ, Rapino MA, Landivar LC (2012) Home-Based Workers in the United States: 2010. U.S. Department of Commerce - Current Population Reports.Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Marketing Res. 45(6):633–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Tadelis S (2019) How artificial intelligence and machine learning can impact market design. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, eds. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 567–586.Google Scholar
• Northover SB, Pedersen WC, Cohen AB, Andrews PW (2017) Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: Two meta-analyses. Evolution Human Behav. 38(1):144–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oaxaca R (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Internat. Econom. Rev. 14(3):693–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1995) Bargaining experiments. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 253–348.Google Scholar
• Shalvi S, Eldar O, Bereby-Meyer Y (2012) Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psych. Sci. 23(10):1264–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalvi S, Gino F, Barkan R, Ayal S (2015) Self-serving justifications. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 24(2):125–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siebenaler S, Szymkowiak A, Robertson P, Johnson GI, Law J, Fee K (2019) Honesty, social presence and self-service in retail. Interacting Comput. 31(2):154–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toma C, Bonus J, Van Swol L (2019) Lying online: Examining the production, detection, and popular beliefs surrounding interpersonal deception in technologically-mediated environments. Docan-Morgan T, ed. The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland), 583–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trivers R (2006) Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later. Kappeler PM, van Schaik CP, eds. Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution (Springer, New York), 67–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turkle S (2012) The flight from conversation. New York Times (April 21).Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce (2017) Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales - 2nd Quarter 2017. U.S. Census Bureau News (August 17), https://www2.census.gov/retail/releases/historical/ecomm/17q2.pdf.Google Scholar
• Valley K, Thompson L, Gibbons R, Bazerman MH (2002) How communication improves efficiency in bargaining games. Games Econom. Behav. 38(1):127–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanberg C (2008) Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76(6):1467–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar