Sequential Procurement with Contractual and Experimental Learning

References

• Acharya A, Ortner J (2017) Progressive learning. Econometrica 85(6):1965–1990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Rochet J-C (1999) Multi-dimensional screening: A user’s guide. Eur. Econom. Rev. 43(4-6):959–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Valimaki J (1996) Learning and strategic pricing. Econometrica 64(5):1125–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry DA, Fristedt B (1985) Bandit Problems: Sequential Allocation of Experiments (Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability) (Chapman and Hall, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Muharremoglu A (2013) On implications of demand censoring in the newsvendor problem. Management Sci. 59(6):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Chaneton J, Moallemi CC (2017) The exploration-exploitation trade-off in the newsvendor problem. Columbia Business School Research Paper, 14-61.Google Scholar
• Bondareva M, Pinker E (2019) Dynamic relational contracts for quality enforcement in supply chains. Management Sci. 65(3):1305–1321.Link, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Gallien J (2007) Dynamic Assortment with Demand Learning for Seasonal Consumer Goods. Management Sci. 53(2):276–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A, Martínez-de Albéniz V (2011) Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):227–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Che Y-K (1993) Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. 24(4):668–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• den Boer AV, Zwart B (2014) Simultaneously Learning and Optimizing Using Controlled Variance Pricing. Management Sci. 60(3):770–783.Link, Google Scholar
• Devanur NR, Peres Y, Sivan B (2019) Perfect bayesian equilibria in repeated sales. Games Econom. Behav. 118:570–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman Intelligence (2017) Freelancing in America: 2017. Technical report. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/upwork/freelancing-in-america-2017.Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Haruvy E, Katok E (2007) A comparison of buyer-determined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms. Marketing Sci. 26(5):629–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Harrison JM, Keskin NB, Zeevi A (2012) Bayesian dynamic pricing policies: Learning and earning under a binary prior distribution. Management Sci. 58(3):570–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Hart OD, Tirole J (1988) Contract Renegotiation and Coasian Dynamics. Rev. Econom. Stud. 55(4):509–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kakade S, Lobel I, Nazerzadeh H (2013) Optimal Dynamic Mechanism Design and the Virtual-Pivot Mechanism. Oper. Res. 61(4):837–854.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms: restricting agent actions. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Kessler A (1998) The value of ignorance. RAND J. Econom. 29(2):339–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1990) Adverse selection and renegotiation in procurement. Rev. Econom. Stud. 57(4):597–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Lattimore T (2016) Regret analysis of the finite-horizon gittins index strategy for multi-armed bandits. Conf. on Learn. Theory, 1214–1245.Google Scholar
• Levin J (2003) Relational incentive contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):835–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lobel I, Paes Leme R (2019) Dynamic contracting under positive commitment. Proc. Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2101–2108.Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Ortner J (2017) Durable goods monopoly with stochastic costs. Theor. Econom. 12(2):817–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2010) Information disclosure and unraveling in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2:34–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y (2020) Newsvendor decisions with two-sided learning. Management Sci. 66(11):5408–5426.Link, Google Scholar
• Parkes DC, Kalagnanam J (2005) Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Sci. 51(3):435–451.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavan A, Segal I, Toikka J (2014) Dynamic Mechanism Design: A Myersonian Approach. Econometrica 82(2):601–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roesler AK, Szentes B (2017) Buyer-optimal learning and monopoly pricing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(7):2072–2080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauré D, Zeevi A (2013) Optimal dynamic assortment planning with demand learning. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):387–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmidt KM (1993) Commitment through incomplete information in a simple repeated bargaining game. J. Econom. Theory. 60(1):114–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Plambeck EL (2007a) Simple relational contracts to motivate capacity investment: Price only vs. price and quantity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(1):94–113.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Plambeck EL (2007b) Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1577–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B (2009) Impact of supply learning when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(2):192–209.Link, Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Beil DR (2009) RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. 57(4):934–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang ZB, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR (2012) Using a dual-sourcing option in the presence of asymmetric information about supplier reliability: competition vs. diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):202–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Nagarajan M, Sošić G (2010) Dynamic supplier contracts under asymmetric inventory information. Oper. Res. 58(5):1380–1397.Link, Google Scholar