Frustration-Based Promotions: Field Experiments in Ride-Sharing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.3991

References

  • Aaker J, Fournier S, Brasel SA (2004) When good brands do bad. J. Consumer Res. 31(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abeler J, Calaki J, Andree K, Basek C (2010) The power of apology. Econom. Lett. 107(2):233–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson SW, Baggett LS, Widener SK (2009) The impact of service operations failures on customer satisfaction: Evidence on how failures and their source affect what matters to customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(1):52–69.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson EW, Fornell C, Lehmann DR (1994) Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. J. Marketing 58(3):53–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreyeva T, Long MW, Brownell KD (2010) The impact of food prices on consumption: A systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Amer. J. Public Health 100(2):216–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry LL, Parasuraman A (2004) Marketing Services: Competing Through Quality (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bitner MJ (1990) Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. J. Marketing 54(2):69–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitner MJ, Booms BH, Tetreault MS (1990) The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. J. Marketing 54(1):71–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton RN, Grewal D, Levy M (2007) Six strategies for competing through service: An agenda for future research. J. Retailing 83(1):1–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buell RW, Kim T, Tsay CJ (2016) Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Sci. 63(6):1673–1695.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen SFS, Monroe KB, Lou YC (1998) The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intentions. J. Retailing 74(3):353–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen P, Hahn R, Hall J, Levitt S, Metcalfe R (2016) Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MC, Leung NHZ, Panchamgam K, Perakis G, Smith A (2017) The impact of linear optimization on promotion planning. Oper. Res. 65(2):446–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Craighead CW, Karwan KR, Miller JL (2004) The effects of severity of failure and customer loyalty on service recovery strategies. Production Oper. Management 13(4):307–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cui R, Zhang DJ, Bassamboo A (2019) Learning from inventory availability information: Evidence from field experiments on Amazon. Management Sci. 65(3):1216–1235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis S, Inman JJ, McAlister L (1992) Promotion has a negative effect on brand evaluations—Or does it? Additional disconfirming evidence. J. Marketing Res. 29(1):143–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Cremer D, Pillutla MM, Folmer CR (2011) How important is an apology to you? Forecasting errors in evaluating the value of apologies. Psych. Sci. 22(1):45–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M, Gallino S, Li J (2018) Competition-based dynamic pricing in online retailing: A methodology validated with field experiments. Management Sci. 64(6):2496–2514.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallino S, Moreno A (2018) The value of fit information in online retail: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):767–787.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal D, Levy M (2009) Emerging issues in retailing research. J. Retailing 85(4):522–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal D, Roggeveen AL, Tsiros M (2008) The effect of compensation on repurchase intentions in service recovery. J. Retailing 84(4):424–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halperin B, Ho B, List JA, Muir I (2019) Toward an understanding of the economics of apologies: Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. w25676, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho B (2012) Apologies as signals: With evidence from a trust game. Management Sci. 58(1):141–158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch SJ, Kim BD, Montgomery AL, Rossi PE (1995) Determinants of store-level price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):17–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman KD, Kelley SW, Chung BC (2003) A CIT investigation of servicescape failures and associated recovery strategies. J. Services Marketing 17(4):322–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalwani MU, Yim CK (1992) Consumer price and promotion expectations: An experimental study. J. Marketing Res. 29(1):90–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley SW, Hoffman KD, Davis MA (1993) A typology of retail failures and recoveries. J. Retailing 69(4):429–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohavi R, Deng A, Frasca B, Walker T, Xu Y, Pohlmann N (2013) Online controlled experiments at large scale. Proc. 19th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM), 1168–1176.Google Scholar
  • Lehtimäki AV, Monroe KB, Somervuori O (2019) The influence of regular price level (low, medium, or high) and framing of discount (monetary or percentage) on perceived attractiveness of discount amount. J. Revenue Pricing Management 18(1):76–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maxwell SE, Delaney HD, Kelley K (2017) Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, vol. 1. (Routledge, England, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKechnie S, Devlin J, Ennew C, Smith A (2012) Effects of discount framing in comparative price advertising. Eur. J. Marketing 46(11):1501–1522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mittal V, Kamakura WA (2001) Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior: Investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. J. Marketing Res. 38(1):131–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nevo A, Wolfram C (2002) Why do manufacturers issue coupons? An empirical analysis of breakfast cereals. RAND J. Econom. 33(2):319–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohtsubo Y, Matsunaga M, Himichi T, Suzuki K, Shibata E, Hori R, Umemura T, Ohira H (2020) Costly group apology communicates a group’s sincere “intention”. Soc. Neurosci. 15(2):244–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohtsubo Y, Watanabe E, Kim J, Kulas JT, Muluk H, Nazar G, Wang F, Zhang J (2012) Are costly apologies universally perceived as being sincere? A test of the costly apology-perceived sincerity relationship in seven countries. J. Evolutionary Psych. 10(4):187–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parasuraman A, Berry LL, Zeithaml VA (1991) Understanding customer expectations of service. Sloan Management Rev. 32(3):39–48.Google Scholar
  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing 49(4):41–50.Google Scholar
  • Reimers I, Xie C (2019) Do coupons expand or cannibalize revenue? Evidence from an e-market. Management Sci. 65(1):286–300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roggeveen AL, Tsiros M, Grewal D (2012) Understanding the co-creation effect: When does collaborating with customers provide a lift to service recovery? J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(6):771–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schweitzer ME, Hershey JC, Bradlow ET (2006) Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Serpa JC, Krishnan H (2018) The impact of supply chains on firm-level productivity. Management Sci. 64(2):511–532.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J, Teng N, Netessine S (2019) Philanthropic campaigns and customer behavior: Field experiments on an online taxi booking platform. Management Sci. 65(2):913–932.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Skarlicki DP, Folger R, Gee J (2004) When social accounts backfire: The exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 34(2):322–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith AK, Bolton RN (1998) An experimental investigation of customer reactions to service failure and recovery encounters: Paradox or peril? J. Service Res. 1(1):65–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith AK, Bolton RN, Wagner J (1999) A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. J. Marketing Res. 36(3):356–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S (1994) Waiting for service: The relationship between delays and evaluations of service. J. Marketing 58(2):56–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsiros M, Mittal V, Ross WT Jr (2004) The role of attributions in customer satisfaction: A reexamination. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):476–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walster E, Berscheid E, Walster GW (1973) New directions in equity research. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 25(2):151–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner B (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psych. Rev. 92(4):548–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winer RS (1986) A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. 13(2):250–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu M, Teunter RH, Zhu SX (2019) Online marketing: When to offer a refund for advanced sales. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 36(3):471–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahorik AJ, Rust RT (1992) Modeling the impact of service quality on profitability: A review. Adv. Services Marketing Management 1(1):247–276.Google Scholar
  • Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. J. Marketing 60(2):31–46.Google Scholar
  • Zhang DJ, Dai H, Dong L, Qi F, Zhang N, Liu X, Liu Z (2017) How does dynamic pricing affect customer behavior on retailing platforms? Evidence from a large randomized experiment on Alibaba. Working paper, Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.