The Persistent Effects of Short-Term Peer Groups on Performance: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Higher Education

References

• Altonji JG, Arcidiacono P, Maurel A (2016) The analysis of field choice in college and graduate school: Determinants and wage effects. Handbook of the Economics of Education, vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 305–396.Google Scholar
• Ammermueller A, Pischke JS (2009) Peer effects in european primary schools: Evidence from the progress in international reading literacy study. J. Labor Econom. 27(3):315–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD (2014) The perils of peer effects. Labour Econom. 30:98–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P, Foster G, Goodpaster N, Kinsler J (2012) Estimating spillovers using panel data, with an application to the classroom. Quant. Econom. 3(3):421–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Bagues M, Cabrales A, Iriberri N (2019) What you don’t know . . . can’t hurt you? A natural field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education. Management Sci. 65(8):3714–3736.Link, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Back MD, Schmukle SC, Egloff B (2008) Becoming friends by chance. Psych. Sci. 19(5):439–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):417–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booij AS, Leuven E, Oosterbeek H (2017) Ability peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(2):547–578.Google Scholar
• Brenøe AA, Zölitz U (2020) Exposure to more female peers widens the gender gap in STEM participation. J. Labor Econom. 38(4):1009–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke MA, Sass TR (2013) Classroom peer effects and student achievement. J. Labor Econom. 31(1):51–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caeyers B, Fafchamps M (2020) Exclusion bias and the estimation of peer effects. Discussion paper 14386, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, West JE (2010) Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. J. Political Econom. 118(3):409–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Fullerton RL, West JE (2009) Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. J. Labor Econom. 27(3):439–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Sacerdote BI, West JE (2013) From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica 81(3):855–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke D, Romano JP, Wolf M (2020) The Romano-Wolf multiple hypothesis correction in Stata. Stata J. 20(4):812–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsner B, Isphording IE (2017) A big fish in a small pond: Ability rank and human capital investment. J. Labor Econom. 35(3):787–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epple D, Romano RE (2011) Peer effects in education: A survey of the theory and evidence. Handbook of Social Economics, vol. 1 (North-Holland), 1053–1163.Google Scholar
• Eugster B, Lalive R, Steinhauer A, Zweimüller J (2011) The demand for social insurance: Does culture matter? Econom. J. 121(556):413–448.Google Scholar
• Feld J, Zölitz U (2017) Understanding peer effects: On the nature, estimation and channels of peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):387–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld J, Zölitz U (2020) The effect of peer gender on major choice in business school. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print March 11, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3860.Google Scholar
• Fischer S (2017) The downside of good peers: How classroom composition differentially affects men’s and women’s stem persistence. Labour Econom. 46:211–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer T, Rode J (2020) Classroom or pub—where are persistent peer relationships between university students formed? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 178:474–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher RA (1935) The Design of Experiments (Oliver and Boyd, London).Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Kissová Z, Lee J, Prowse V (2019) First-place loving and last-place loathing: How rank in the distribution of performance affects effort provision. Management Sci. 65(2):494–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Guryan J, Kroft K, Notowidigdo MJ (2009) Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional golf tournaments. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(4):34–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes RM, Oyer P, Schaefer S (2005) Coworker complementarity and the stability of top-management teams. J. Law Econom. Organ. 22(1):184–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoxby CM, Weingarth G (2005) Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Levy D (2008) Peer effects and alcohol use among college students. J. Econom. Perspect. 22(3):189–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim J, Meer J (2017) The impact of teacher-student gender matches: Random assignment evidence from South Korea. J. Human Resources 52(4):979–997.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyle DS (2007) Estimating and interpreting peer and role model effects from randomly assigned social groups at West Point. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(2):289–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyle DS (2009) The effects of peer group heterogeneity on the production of human capital at west point. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(4):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh HW (1987) The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. J. Ed. Psych. 79(3):280–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy R, Weinhardt F (2020) Top of the class: The importance of ordinal rank. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(6):2777–2826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oosterbeek H, van Ewijk R (2014) Gender peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Econom. Ed. Rev. 38(C):51–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers T, Feller A (2016) Discouraged by peer excellence: Exposure to exemplary peer performance causes quitting. Psych. Sci. 27(3):365–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romano JP, Wolf M (2005) Exact and approximate stepdown methods for multiple hypothesis testing. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100(469):94–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2011) Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? Handbook of the Economics of Education, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 249–277.Google Scholar
• Schulz J, Thiemann P, Thöni C (2018) Nudging generosity: Choice architecture and cognitive factors in charitable giving. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 74:139–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz KL, Schoenherr T, Nembhard D (2010) An example and a proposal concerning the correlation of worker processing times in parallel tasks. Management Sci. 56(1):176–191.Link, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Balasubramanian S, Roth AV (2007) Incentives that induce task-related effort, helping, and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Sci. 53(10):1533–1550.Link, Google Scholar
• Stinebrickner R, Stinebrickner TR (2006) What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds. J. Public Econom. 90(8):1435–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tafreschi D, Thiemann P (2016) Doing it twice, getting it right? The effect of grade retention and course repetition in higher education. Econom. Ed. Rev. 55:198–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan TF, Netessine S (2019) When you work with a superman, will you also fly? An empirical study of the impact of coworkers on performance. Management Sci. 65(8):3495–3517.Link, Google Scholar
• Tincani MM (2017) Heterogeneous peer effects and rank concerns: Theory and evidence. HCEO working paper 2017-006, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2007) Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. J. Econometrics 141(2):1281–1301.Crossref, Google Scholar